MA Senate - Special Election Results thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:40:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA Senate - Special Election Results thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 24
Author Topic: MA Senate - Special Election Results thread  (Read 82810 times)
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,021


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: January 19, 2010, 08:06:03 PM »

I won't believe it till I see it. But I'm hopeful Brown has pulled this one out.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: January 19, 2010, 08:07:05 PM »

Coakley's pollster (Lake, according to Fox) blaming the White House; White House blaming Coakley.

Just love circular firing squad before the result is announced.

I don't know what Coakley's people think Obama was supposed to do differently. She's the one that squandered a 15 point lead in a week. Obama and the national party's numbers stayed pretty constant throughout the same period, so it's clear that it's largely her fault.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: January 19, 2010, 08:07:19 PM »

When will the first numbers trickle out?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: January 19, 2010, 08:07:27 PM »

I won't believe it till I see it. But I'm hopeful Brown has pulled this one out.

Ditto.  I'm still skeptical.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: January 19, 2010, 08:07:38 PM »

How long until the first Massachusetts precincts typically report?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: January 19, 2010, 08:08:39 PM »

Coakley's pollster (Lake, according to Fox) blaming the White House; White House blaming Coakley.

Just love circular firing squad before the result is announced.

I don't know what Coakley's people think Obama was supposed to do differently. She's the one that squandered a 15 point lead in a week. Obama and the national party's numbers stayed pretty constant throughout the same period, so it's clear that it's largely her fault.

Too soft on Wall Street; not enough attention to Main Street.  I'm just reporting, not commenting.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: January 19, 2010, 08:08:54 PM »

Even Olbermann is talking like it's curtains. The media seems to have completely written Coakley off, bad sign for her.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: January 19, 2010, 08:09:41 PM »

Even though I feel that Brown will win, I am skeptical that he can win. I WANT COAKLEY to win, make no mistake. But this thread should be dedicated to results ONLY.

Any news yet?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: January 19, 2010, 08:10:25 PM »

Even Olbermann is talking like it's curtains for Coakley. The media seems to have completely written Coakley off, bad sign for her.

Actually, Fox is a bit more reserved.  I'm surprised; I generally don't watch FNC.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,788


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: January 19, 2010, 08:10:25 PM »

First precincts are up on boston.com.

Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: January 19, 2010, 08:11:19 PM »

0-1% reporting

55-44

Brown lead
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,862
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: January 19, 2010, 08:11:38 PM »

Pollster says 22% of dems went for Brown
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: January 19, 2010, 08:11:57 PM »

First precincts are up on boston.com.



AP too. Brown up by 733 (11%).
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,805


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: January 19, 2010, 08:12:14 PM »

I still have hope that Coakley can pull it out. There were no polls for Monday. All she needs to do is make up 5 points in a race that is rapidly changing.... the narrative has certainly changed very quickly over the past couple days even.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: January 19, 2010, 08:12:59 PM »

Rasmussen did exit polls!!!
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #90 on: January 19, 2010, 08:13:03 PM »

Coakley's pollster (Lake, according to Fox) blaming the White House; White House blaming Coakley.

Just love circular firing squad before the result is announced.

I don't know what Coakley's people think Obama was supposed to do differently. She's the one that squandered a 15 point lead in a week. Obama and the national party's numbers stayed pretty constant throughout the same period, so it's clear that it's largely her fault.

Too soft on Wall Street; not enough attention to Main Street.  I'm just reporting, not commenting.

Even if that's so, the national situation has not changed in the past two weeks or so, while her poll numbers have. She was winning by a healthy margin even when Obama was "too soft on Wall Street; not enough attention to Main Street."
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #91 on: January 19, 2010, 08:13:24 PM »


Just saw that on Fox. Amazing, right?
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #92 on: January 19, 2010, 08:13:46 PM »

Rasmussen did exit polling saying late-breaking voters backed Coakley by 6% and 22% of Democrats voted Brown.

So we know we're looking at the Democrats losing about 1/5th of Democrats
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #93 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:10 PM »

Bolton, the first town of any notable size in, is a 28.8% swing to the GOP

Gosnold (tiny) 55.9% GOPward
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #94 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:18 PM »

Coakley's pollster (Lake, according to Fox) blaming the White House; White House blaming Coakley.

Just love circular firing squad before the result is announced.

I don't know what Coakley's people think Obama was supposed to do differently. She's the one that squandered a 15 point lead in a week. Obama and the national party's numbers stayed pretty constant throughout the same period, so it's clear that it's largely her fault.

Too soft on Wall Street; not enough attention to Main Street.  I'm just reporting, not commenting.

Even if that's so, the national situation has not changed in the past two weeks or so, while her poll numbers have. She was winning by a healthy margin even when Obama was "too soft on Wall Street; not enough attention to Main Street."

People have been saying that about Obama since October 2008.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #95 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:22 PM »

1% of votes in

54%  Brown
45% Coakley
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,805


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #96 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:33 PM »

Yeah, J.J. is always commenting.

Rasmussen has hyperactivity, much like much of the Right these days... too bad you can't trust them. Rasmussen is fine with horse race polls but when they're crafting questions on other topics it's total BS.
Logged
Kushahontas
floating_to_sea
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,627
Kenya


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #97 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:37 PM »

omg Coakley gains 1 ~JOEMENTUM
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #98 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:54 PM »


12/2168
Brown up by 1165 (9%)
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #99 on: January 19, 2010, 08:15:20 PM »

From rass:

"Among those who decided how they would vote in the past few days, Coakley has a slight edge, 47% to 41%."

Suprising considering how the narrative has gone lately.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 24  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 11 queries.