MA Senate - Special Election Results thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:40:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA Senate - Special Election Results thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA Senate - Special Election Results thread  (Read 83150 times)
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« on: January 19, 2010, 07:36:12 PM »
LOL. Chris Matthews just forgot Scott Brown's name.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2010, 07:43:55 PM »
Quote from: Lunar on January 19, 2010, 07:40:54 PM
CNN just said all of the people at Coakley HQ are downcast and looking disappointed

That's not surprising. The media has been pretty sold on the polls the past couple of weeks, not a whole of things to be happy about on their side.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2010, 07:59:05 PM »
Last minute calls?

Brown (R) 51.1%
Coakley (D) 47.2%
Kennedy (I) 1.7%
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2010, 08:08:54 PM »
Even Olbermann is talking like it's curtains. The media seems to have completely written Coakley off, bad sign for her.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2010, 08:11:57 PM »
Quote from: muon2 on January 19, 2010, 08:10:25 PM
First precincts are up on boston.com.



AP too. Brown up by 733 (11%).
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2010, 08:14:54 PM »

12/2168
Brown up by 1165 (9%)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2010, 08:17:43 PM »

36/2168
Brown up by 4187 (10%)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2010, 08:20:46 PM »

79/2168
Brown up by 3028 (5%)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2010, 08:23:09 PM »

116/2168
Brown up by 5163 (5%)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2010, 08:28:36 PM »
Brown up 10,514 (5%)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2010, 08:32:52 PM »
Brown up 17,913 (53-46)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2010, 08:35:04 PM »

13% Reporting: Brown up 24,021 (53-46)
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2010, 08:45:09 PM »
It's really early, but Coakleys numbers in Boston are a very bad sign for her. If this pattern continues, the race will be called for Brown with 40% in.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2010, 08:52:47 PM »

and 41% in Worcester. Time to let the curtains fall on Martha Coakley.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.