AR-Mason Dixon: Lincoln in tight battle with 6 Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:52:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  AR-Mason Dixon: Lincoln in tight battle with 6 Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AR-Mason Dixon: Lincoln in tight battle with 6 Republicans  (Read 919 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 22, 2010, 01:38:19 AM »

Conducted for Arkansas News Bureau/Stephens Media:



DEM Primary:

Lincoln came out on top in the hypothetical primary match-ups. Asked who they would vote for in the Democratic primary if the candidates were Lincoln and Halter, 52 percent of likely primary voters said they would vote for Lincoln and 34 percent said they would vote for Halter.

If the candidates were Lincoln and Johnson, 63 percent said they would vote for Lincoln and 22 percent said they would vote for Johnson.

.....



Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., conducted phone interviews with 625 Arkansans Monday through Wednesday. Only people who said they vote regularly in state elections were included. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

For questions about the Democratic primary, a sub-sample of 303 likely Democratic primary voters was surveyed. The margin of error on the Democratic primary results is plus or minus 6 percent.

http://arkansasnews.com/2010/01/21/poll-shows-lincoln-neck-and-neck-with-gop-challengers/
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2010, 01:46:53 AM »

They could have at least tested Halter vs. Baker to see the difference to Lincoln ... Tongue
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2010, 03:14:33 AM »

The only positive thing Lincoln can take away from this is that her opponents are still virtual unknowns.  So right now she's essentially losing to "generic Republican."  All she can hope for at this point is a tough GOP primary that results in the airing of some serious attacks and/or dirty laundry.  Without that Lincoln is toast.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2010, 07:57:06 AM »

Obama at 37/50? That seems a little... favorable.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2010, 10:34:32 AM »

It's worth noting that Jim Holt, by far the most well known out of the candidates (he ran against Lincoln in 04 and for Lt. Gov. in 06), is the one performing the worst.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,402
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2010, 10:47:45 AM »

Considerably not that bad for Lincoln...
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2010, 07:03:56 PM »

Remember, folks, that M-D doesn't push the undecideds (or in this case, those who don't like Obama but are unwilling to say so) like RAS, SUSA, PPP, etc.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 15 queries.