Fight and Fight Again
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 01:17:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Fight and Fight Again
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fight and Fight Again  (Read 1370 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 28, 2010, 05:34:47 PM »

Fight and Fight Again

There are some of us, Mr Chairman, who will fight and fight and fight again to save the party we love – Hugh Gaitskell, Labour Party Conference, October 1960

I – The Contest: 1955-1956

There are some who say it was all over when Attlee stepped down after losing to Eden in May 1955. But, to most now, the day the Labour Party died was the day the leadership election of that same year was held. With the power vacuum left by the resignation of Clement Attlee, practically an idol to many Labour supporters, the stage opened to two actors of tremendous prestige.

Aneurin Bevan was the father of the NHS and one of the most left wing members of Labour. Born in the coalfields of South Wales, he was devoted to socialism in its purest form and resigned as Minister of Labour when prescription charges for spectacles and dental care were introduced in 1951 to pay for Britain’s involvement in the Korean War. Hostile to the right, he once described the Conservative Party as ‘lower than vermin’

His opponent, described as a ‘desiccated calculating machine’ by Bevan himself, was Hugh Gaitskell. Representing the right of the party, he also had a wide following within the party. Many of his views were controversial within the party: his support for an end to Clause 4 (The section of the Constitution of the Labour Party supporting nationalisation of the means of production). He was also vocal in his hostility towards nuclear disarmament and the European Economic Community.

A third candidate was also running: Herbert Morrison; a Labour minister during the war and another member of the Labour right. Many of his followers felt he was too old by 1955 however and instead intended to switch their vote to Gaitskell.

The ballot was to be held on December 14th 1955, but a day before, Morrison withdrew, much to the surprise of the party. Gaitskell’s rhetoric, blaming the left wing of the party for the defeat in May also proved to be a turn-off for many Labour MPs. The split was deep within Labour, and the result of the ballot surprised many. Gaitskell won 140; Bevan 123.

This in itself might not have been the end of the party, but Gaitskell chose to move to have Clause IV repealed and called a special conference for such means. This coming at such a weak time for the party, chaos ensued. Bevan could not believe Gaitskell would support the repealing of an element he believed so fundamental to Labour and to socialism. When it passed, bitter words were exchanged in Parliament and the party was clearly falling apart at the seams. The final shock came when Bevan chose to leave the party altogether and become an ‘Independent Labour’ MP on December 29th 1955. On January 1st 1956, however, he announced the formation of the Socialist Labour Party, and 21 other MPs crossed the floor to this party also. By the end of the year, this party would comprise 40 loyal Bevanites.

However, the split was not as catastrophic as it could have been. Labour itself remained intact for now, and though there were still some Bevan sympathisers in the party, they were now marginalised. Gaitskell’s pragmatic approach would be the new strategy of the party.
With the split in the party, the composition of the House of Commons on June 1st 1956 was:

Conservative – 348
Labour – 228
Socialist Labour – 40
Liberal – 12
Sinn Fein – 2

The rise in Liberal power should also be noted, as some Labour members crossed the floor to the Liberal Party in disillusion at the state of the party.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2010, 06:06:11 PM »
« Edited: January 28, 2010, 06:08:43 PM by Le cœur à gaz »

II – Fall of Eden and the Ascendancy of Butler: 1956

Meanwhile, Anthony Eden, British Prime Minister and leader of the Conservative Party had little time to rejoice the fall of his enemies. Events in Egypt had caught his concern as Gamal Abdel Nasser, the Egyptian President and nationalist, sought control of the Suez Canal by Egypt. This was met with hostility by Britain and France, who held large shares in the canal. But, Nasser went ahead anyway and on July 26th 1956, the Egyptian government nationalised the Suez Canal.

Eden immediately considered the use of military force to make Nasser back down over the decision, but the French were indecisive over the crisis. Meanwhile, both Bevan and Gaitskell were united in a rare joint condemnation of any use of military force to bring the Canal back under British control. When the US made clear its opposition to UK military intervention, Eden backed down.

Many Conservatives were angry at the humiliation of Britain by a third world country in such a manner, and immediately turned on Eden: Butler arose as a new leader for the Conservative Party among many. For the first time, the Conservative Party decided to hold a leadership election to determine the new leader of their party. R.A.B. Butler stood against the Prime Minister as a moderate conservative. Macmillan and Lord Woolton also stood as candidates. The results of the first ballot were as such:

Butler – 177
Eden – 79
Macmillan – 76
Woolton – 16

With Eden having been crushed, he promptly tendered his resignation; had he not stood, it is widely believed Macmillan would have triumphed and become the new prime minister. Macmillan and Woolton also both conceded the election minutes later.
The Conservative Party now had a new leader and the country a new prime minister. How well the new government fared remained to be seen.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2010, 11:40:00 PM »

Good TL
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 04:29:01 AM »

III – The Butler Cabinet: 1956

Butler felt the need to appoint a cabinet which would combine many elements of the Conservative Party and help unite them around him. He was still in a fragile position due to the large opposition against him within the party. His first choice was to pick Macmillan, a figure of the opposition in the party, as Chancellor of the Exchequer. This had been the role he had served under Eden and there was little surprise at his choice.

For a foreign secretary, Edward Heath was picked. This was his first ministerial position and Butler had much trust in him as was proven by assigning him such a post when Britain’s prestige was at its nadir: Suez had humiliated the nation and the retreat from empire was about to begin.

The home secretary was an even more controversial choice. Enoch Powell was appointed to this office, and though he agreed with many policies of Butler socially, he remained hostile to immigration from the Commonwealth, and there was little doubt that he would push for restrictions to be enacted by the government.

The Earl of Home was moved from Commonwealth Relations to defence. The Marquess of Salisbury was appointed President of the Board of Trade. Viscount Hailsham became the new minister for health and Peter Thorneycroft took over agriculture.

With this team, it was hoped that a new innovative government could be formed and new reforms taken to improve the state of the nation.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2010, 09:22:44 PM »

Vosem like.
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2010, 09:23:26 PM »

Good Work Winston, but If possible, I'd try and move this to the Election What-If's board, it'll get a lot more views + compliments from there.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2010, 05:36:02 AM »

Good Work Winston, but If possible, I'd try and move this to the Election What-If's board, it'll get a lot more views + compliments from there.

Alright.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.