Useage of "Poors" spreads throughout the internet
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:08:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Useage of "Poors" spreads throughout the internet
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Useage of "Poors" spreads throughout the internet  (Read 1815 times)
tik 🪀✨
ComradeCarter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,496
Australia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2010, 08:16:20 PM »

Now that you mention it we used to call our Oldsmobile "the olds" as well.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2010, 10:02:30 PM »
« Edited: February 05, 2010, 10:04:16 PM by Supersoulty »

Poor, pour, and pore are for me homophones, with lure rhyming with pure not poor.

"Poor", "pour", and "pore" are homophonous, but "lure" doesn't rhyme with "pure"; it rhymes with "fewer".  "Pure" rhymes with "cure".  Silly South Carolinian.

I suppose "tourist" sounds like "turrist" for you, doesn't it?  Boo.

I agree that pure rhymes with cure, but Pedro agrees with me that tourist rhymes with sucker. Wink


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

P.S.  I find it very unfortunate that someone else didn't get that before me.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.