Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2013, 04:18:53 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderators: Emsworth, True Federalist)
| | |-+  The Perry v. Schwarzenegger discussion thread
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Perry v. Schwarzenegger discussion thread  (Read 1255 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14057


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -1.22

View Profile
« on: February 01, 2010, 06:56:18 pm »
Ignore

David Boies is a genius, and I'm loving Judge Walker.  He seems to be literally aggravated by the defense and their arguments.

Of course, my read (or the read of the Twitter feeds I'm following) could be way off.  What does everyone take away from this?

I hope we do get the YouTube clips at some point.  This sounds like the best thing since the Monkey Trial.  The trashing of Tam on the witness stand was unbelievable.  He was just destroyed!
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21559
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2010, 10:38:40 pm »

If Walker hands down a decision ruling that the U.S. Constitution requires gay marriage to be recognized by all fifty States it won't survive an appeal to the current Supreme Court.  It also could trigger a Constitutional Convention so that a Defense of Marriage Amendment can be considered that would leave the issue of Marriage to each State.  [I can't see Congress passing such an amendment, and it might not be able to pass 3/4 [38] of the states, but with the assistance of states that want a convention, the lower threshold of 2/3 [34] of the states might be passed to call a convention.]

Also keep in mind that as far as the legal case went, the side of evolution lost the Monkey Trial as the Butler Act (which barred the teaching of evolution in Tennessee public schools) was upheld by the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14057


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2010, 12:03:04 am »
Ignore

If Walker hands down a decision ruling that the U.S. Constitution requires gay marriage to be recognized by all fifty States it won't survive an appeal to the current Supreme Court. 

Of course it wouldn't.  That doesn't mean the trial isn't fun.
Logged

Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6520
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2010, 10:27:37 am »
Ignore

http://prop8trialtracker.com/

That's the site I used to follow the trial. Granted, since the testimony is over now, the site isn't as relevant anymore. Anyway, is it normal for the plaintiffs to have two and a half weeks of witnesses, and the defendants have two days, with both of their witnesses agreeing with the plaintiffs, all while annoying the judge at the same time? If it is, then the prop 8 side performed very well.
Logged

Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8112
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2010, 11:31:41 pm »
Ignore

It also could trigger a Constitutional Convention so that a Defense of Marriage Amendment can be considered that would leave the issue of Marriage to each State.

Most likely this would only enrage those who are opposed to same-sex marriage, leading to a huge movement to ban same-sex marriage with a Constitutional amendment.  Most Americans do not believe in federalism, anymore.  It's either same-sex marriage should be banned on a federal level, or should be legalized on a federal level.  Ask anybody on the street what the Tenth Amendment is and they probably wouldn't know.

Such an amendment clarifying that same-sex marriage should be left to the states would be great.  It will never happen, though.  Not with all the hacks in Washington who think that their views are 100% the best for Murica, and should therefor be shoved down everyone's throats.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2010, 11:34:41 pm by Morgan Brykein »Logged

Free Bradley Manning
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21559
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2010, 12:02:49 am »

It also could trigger a Constitutional Convention so that a Defense of Marriage Amendment can be considered that would leave the issue of Marriage to each State.

Most likely this would only enrage those who are opposed to same-sex marriage, leading to a huge movement to ban same-sex marriage with a Constitutional amendment.  Most Americans do not believe in federalism, anymore.  It's either same-sex marriage should be banned on a federal level, or should be legalized on a federal level.  Ask anybody on the street what the Tenth Amendment is and they probably wouldn't know.

Such an amendment clarifying that same-sex marriage should be left to the states would be great.  It will never happen, though.  Not with all the hacks in Washington who think that their views are 100% the best for Murica, and should therefor be shoved down everyone's throats.

It's not that I think those opposed to same-sex marriage are proponents of federalism, but that I think they'll realize that they can't hope to get thirty-eight States to approve an amendment for an outright ban, but by reframing it as an issue to be left to the States, it might be able to pass.  Even then it's doubtful it would pass unless it was sent to State Conventions, which the GOP might do if they are in charge of Congress at the time.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1956
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2010, 11:49:28 am »
Ignore

People make a big deal about the tenth but what about the 9th and 14th? The tenth amendment is not the only amendment in the constitution.
Logged

metaphysical principles relied on deductive logic, just like isolationism,non-intervention, and the common good do today. More importantly however is that various individuals make the mistake of using them for a golden axiom, despite the fact they have no inherent quality.-John Hoffman

people who claim to be critical thinkers without imposing a simple form of inquiry tend to be pseudoskeptics.-John hoffman

to kill an argument...focus on its structure, and assumptions.- john Hoffman.
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8112
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2010, 12:11:15 pm »
Ignore

People make a big deal about the tenth but what about the 9th and 14th? The tenth amendment is not the only amendment in the constitution.

The Tenth Amendment is still there, though.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2010, 12:15:18 pm by Morgan Brykein »Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory