Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 10:12:45 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History
| | |-+  Alternative History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | | |-+  1965-1969 without Vietnam
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1965-1969 without Vietnam  (Read 418 times)
Sr. Member
Posts: 442
United States

Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: 0.02

View Profile
« on: January 06, 2013, 05:31:09 am »

Let's say either one of the following happens:

Vietnam falls to Communism.
LBJ does a quiet withdrawal from Vietnam in 1965.
LBJ continues the Eisenhower-Kennedy policies in Vietnam and does not escalate the conflict.

Basically, let's say the US doesn't get bogged down in Vietnam in any way that effects the nation in any real way. How do the '60s, from 1965 onward, go? Does the Great Society become even bigger? Does LBJ run for a third (second elected) term in 1968? What does his Presidency look like without Vietnam?

Long term, how does the US look politically? Does a drastic shift to the right still occur as it did in the '80s? Does the cultural revolution of the 1960s still happen?
YaBB God
Posts: 15228
United States

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2013, 10:23:13 am »

Even without Vietnam, Johnson still has to deal with race riots, controversy over open housing, etc. Still, Johnson's life does get a bit easier, as Johnson himself agonized over Vietnam. Despite a Dixiecrat uprising, Johnson may be able to secure a third term, though narrowly. Nixon's long march towards the presidency may be slowed if not stopped altogether. '72 should be interesting, especially given the economic problems Nixon faced in those years.

True Federalist
YaBB God
Posts: 28445
United States

View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2013, 01:49:22 pm »

A lot of the economic problems Nixon inherited from Johnson came from the government trying to buy both guns and butter.  If the US doesn't get bogged down in Vietnam then it is only having to worry about the butter.  However, if the US isn't distracted in Vietnam, it's likely to get involved elsewhere to a greater degree than it did, say for example intervening against the coup that deposed King Idris of Libya in 1969.

My November ballot:
Ervin(I) Gov.
Sellers(D) Lt. Gov.
Hammond(R) Sec. of State
Diggs(D) Att. Gen.
Herbert(D) Comptroller Gen.
Spearman(R) Supt. of Education
DeFelice(American) Commissioner of Agriculture
Hutto(D) US Sen (full)
Scott(R) US Sen (special)
Geddings(Labor) US House SC-2
Quinn(R) SC House District 69
Yes: Amendment 1 (Gen. Assembly may allow and regulate charity raffles)
No: Amendment 2 (end election of the Adjutant General)
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Login with username, password and session length


Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines