What is the highest amount of posts per day someone can have...

[they don't love you like i love you]

and still be a good poster?

I say around 35. Xahar is slightly below that. Everyone above him sucks.

[phk]

20

[Хahar 🤔]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

[Shilly]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

Kalwejt

[© tweed]

age variable

[they don't love you like i love you]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

[Associate Justice PiT]

     35-40 sounds reasonable to me. I myself never managed to get above ~32.

[King]

21.754

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

[Хahar 🤔]

Why.

[Bo]

About 500.

[Deldem]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

Because having more information makes you look bad?

[Franzl]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

Do you understand what an average is? Do you understand that they're talking about your average within a specific time frame?

[Smash255]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

Anyone who is averaging 50 posts per day over a 7 week period  has some issues, hell other than perhaps if someone has the flu someone posting an average of 50 posts a day for 7 days has some issues...

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

Anyone who is averaging 50 posts per day over a 7 week period  has some issues, hell other than perhaps if someone has the flu someone posting an average of 50 posts a day for 7 days has some issues...

I'm averaging 18 posts per day.

Choosing a particular interval of time in an attempt to distort reality and make it look higher is ridiculous.

That BRTD apparently is keeping track of my posts is creepy, especially coming from a poster who has nearly 50,000 posts himself.

[Franzl]

I'm averaging 18 posts per day.

Choosing a particular interval of time in an attempt to distort reality and make it look higher is ridiculous.

That BRTD apparently is keeping track of my posts is creepy, especially coming from a poster who has nearly 50,000 posts himself.

Are you really this dense? It is a fact! Your average post count this year was cited. You may feel that that number is not representative of your posting habits (I disagree...but alright), but it's not distorting any reailty

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

I'm averaging 18 posts per day.

Choosing a particular interval of time in an attempt to distort reality and make it look higher is ridiculous.

That BRTD apparently is keeping track of my posts is creepy, especially coming from a poster who has nearly 50,000 posts himself.

Are you really this dense? It is a fact! Your average post count this year was cited. You may feel that that number is not representative of your posting habits (I disagree...but alright), but it's not distorting any reailty

This point was addressed. My average post count is lower than many here. Choosing a particular interval as representative of one's post count is dishonest.

Why don't you stop following me around now, your grudge is getting old.

[Sbane]

I'm averaging 18 posts per day.

Choosing a particular interval of time in an attempt to distort reality and make it look higher is ridiculous.

That BRTD apparently is keeping track of my posts is creepy, especially coming from a poster who has nearly 50,000 posts himself.

Are you really this dense? It is a fact! Your average post count this year was cited. You may feel that that number is not representative of your posting habits (I disagree...but alright), but it's not distorting any reailty

This point was addressed. My average post count is lower than many here. Choosing a particular interval as representative of one's post count is dishonest.
 

 You will not deny the fact that you have been posting at a rate of about 50 ppd for this year, will you?

[they don't love you like i love you]

Is anyone but Rochambeau higher than me?

I certainly wasn't a good poster when I was above 35.

Also Libertas is only lower because he started posting long after he registered. He's at almost 50 ppd for the year.

No.

Your first post of the year is on page 170 of your history. You've posted 2549 times this year. Do the math.

That's not relevant. The number listed in my profile is all that counts.

Anyone who is averaging 50 posts per day over a 7 week period  has some issues, hell other than perhaps if someone has the flu someone posting an average of 50 posts a day for 7 days has some issues...

I'm averaging 18 posts per day.

Choosing a particular interval of time in an attempt to distort reality and make it look higher is ridiculous.

That BRTD apparently is keeping track of my posts is creepy, especially coming from a poster who has nearly 50,000 posts himself.

I am not keeping track. I calculated it, and it wasn't all that difficult.

[Хahar 🤔]

About 500.

It's not really possible to have more than about 150 for a sustained period.

[Bo]

About 500.

It's not really possible to have more than about 150 for a sustained period.

I defied that rule for a time. I could have defied it indefinitely, but I have a life.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

About 500.

It's not really possible to have more than about 150 for a sustained period.

I defied that rule for a time. I could have defied it indefinitely, but I have a life.

Lol