Caltech creates solar panel with 86% efficiency
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:47:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Caltech creates solar panel with 86% efficiency
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Caltech creates solar panel with 86% efficiency  (Read 728 times)
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 01, 2010, 11:59:53 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Link

This is a pretty major step. The only thing that's really prevented the mass adoption of solar panels hitherto is their relative inefficiency; previous generations of solar panels generally maxed out at half-rate. I look forward to future developments in this area.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2010, 04:59:51 PM »
« Edited: March 02, 2010, 05:01:56 PM by opebo »

That's great.  But we already had coal, so I'm not so excited.
Logged
ARescan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 271
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2010, 05:22:23 PM »

Get it to 100% and I'm all for it.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2010, 07:20:58 PM »

Until they actually do, I'll be skeptical that they can make them for a reasonable cost on a mass production basis.

Fuel cells have had the same problem as well for decades.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2010, 01:10:32 AM »

Until they actually do, I'll be skeptical that they can make them for a reasonable cost on a mass production basis.

Fuel cells have had the same problem as well for decades.

Not so fast!  Check out this article from the February 24th, 2010 LA Times:

Link

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2010, 02:16:16 AM »

I was aware of the recent fuel cell development.  But there are fuel cells and then there are fuel cells.  Solid oxide fuel cells such as mentioned in the article will never be practical for anything other than the large fixed installations mentioned due to their operating characteristics, especially their lengthy start up time and high operating temperatures.  Basically these cells substitute for gas turbines used to generate electricity, but this class of fuel cell will never substitute for the internal combustion engine.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2010, 02:18:29 AM »

Good news. We need to ween ourselves off of foreign oil as quickly as possible.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.