Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2014, 12:57:19 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results
| | |-+  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | | |-+  Why did Gore not let Clinton campagin for him Arkansas?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Why did Gore not let Clinton campagin for him Arkansas?  (Read 684 times)
Siloch
Full Member
***
Posts: 150
United Kingdom


View Profile
« on: January 04, 2013, 03:14:35 pm »
Ignore

Arkansas had 6 electoral votes in 2000 which would have won Gore the election without Florida. I'm new to this site so I hope this hasn't been asked before and I have put it in the right location, like the site though!
Logged

Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them - Ronald Reagan.
Reaganfan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12184
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2013, 11:57:23 am »
Ignore

Bill Clinton was a major political liability in the 2000 election. While his "job" approval rating was high, his personal ratings were meager at best by the time Gore and Bush were running against each other.

George W. Bush ran as the candidate of "change". Gore's campaign saw focus groups that said that Bill Clinton hurt Gore's chances with swing voters.

Logged

sg0508
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.91

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2013, 01:22:11 pm »
Ignore

You have to give Gore credit. It became pretty evident from the start that he wanted to distance himself from Clinton (following the Lewinsky scandal) and he did.  That being said, many Americans still liked Clinton and I believe it would have been a big boost to Gore.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26714
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2013, 09:53:06 am »

You have to give Gore credit. It became pretty evident from the start that he wanted to distance himself from Clinton (following the Lewinsky scandal) and he did.  That being said, many Americans still liked Clinton and I believe it would have been a big boost to Gore.

That may have been what he wanted to do politically, but he failed.  I remember all too well his obsequious description of Clinton as one of our best presidents the day the impeachment trial failed.  Granted, Clinton was hardly one of our worst presidents, but his actions brought disrepute to the office and the United States. The impeachment failed because his failings were not high crimes and misdemeanors, not because Clinton was a great man.   It is why I supported Bradley over Gore and why in 2000 my decision over who to vote for in the general election was between Bush and Nader.  I ended up voting for Nader, but if I had lived in a state like Florida, I would have voted for Bush.
Logged

Daily Reflections on the Revised Common Lectionary

Bible thumping kept to a minimum unless you go to sleep!
The below comic stars me!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines