Will Hillary Clinton Ever Run for President Again?

[Derek]

YES! Be prepared. Don't talk to her, don't look at her. She will be running in the 2012 primaries. If you think I'm kidding just wait until she's president and it happens. We must stop her campaign now! Hurry before it's too late!

[Derek]

YES! Be prepared. Don't talk to her, don't look at her. She will be running in the 2012 primaries. If you think I'm kidding just wait until she's president and it happens. We must stop her campaign now! Hurry before it's too late!

If she's going to be President, it certainly won't be in 2012.

I love how much trust the democrats put into her. If she can get the presidency by back stabbing Obama she will.

[Derek]

YES! Be prepared. Don't talk to her, don't look at her. She will be running in the 2012 primaries. If you think I'm kidding just wait until she's president and it happens. We must stop her campaign now! Hurry before it's too late!

If she's going to be President, it certainly won't be in 2012.

I love how much trust the democrats put into her. If she can get the presidency by back stabbing Obama she will.

Yeah, but she can't get the Presidency that way.

Remember how slick her husband was? She's the same way. They will do whatever it takes. So yes causing a scandal for Obama would help her.

[Derek]

She will most likely quit her job at State in late 2010/early 2011, then write a book or something, like all "retired" pols do.

After getting filthy rich(er), she will campaign for Dems in 2012 and '14, and maybe run for Governor or New York. I still think is a possibility because the Clintons and the Cuomos exhibit absolute hatred for eachother.

In 2016, she will be 69 (Reagan's age), but will still be younger than McCain (72), and Bob Dole (73). She may very well run that year, especially if the Liberal Messiah proves to be an effective and popular puppet Soros puppet (lol).

Short answer? Yes, because the Clintons' political ambition is like a cockroach, in that it cannot be killed.

I'm telling you she won't stop ever. Never under estimate how dangerous she is.

[Derek]

She will most likely quit her job at State in late 2010/early 2011, then write a book or something, like all "retired" pols do.

After getting filthy rich(er), she will campaign for Dems in 2012 and '14, and maybe run for Governor or New York. I still think is a possibility because the Clintons and the Cuomos exhibit absolute hatred for eachother.

In 2016, she will be 69 (Reagan's age), but will still be younger than McCain (72), and Bob Dole (73). She may very well run that year, especially if the Liberal Messiah proves to be an effective and popular puppet Soros puppet (lol).

Short answer? Yes, because the Clintons' political ambition is like a cockroach, in that it cannot be killed.

I'm telling you she won't stop ever. Never under estimate how dangerous she is.

I'm not underestimating how dangerous she is. I have nightmares about Hillary being President of the United States!

lol. Hillary isn't a scary thought.

If you don't think 10 years in prison for hiring your own doctor to evade a universal health care prison is scary, go ahead and vote for her.

[Derek]

She's only 62, and will be about 70 in 2016.  If McCain, Reagan, and Dole can win a primary at that age, so can she.

McCain and Dole lost the general elections in landslides and the same would have occured to Reagan had Carter not been a miserable failure and massive screwup.

So?  The question was whether she'd run again, not whether she'd win.  Back in 2002, lots of people thought McCain would never run again, as he'd be too old in 2008, but he did, at age 72.  Clinton will be "only" 69 in 2016, and women live longer and have fewer health problems at that age.  No reason why she couldn't run again.

Yes and besides, McCain and Reagan really didn't appear to be in their 70's. Watch a Reagan speech from his presidency and tell me with a straight face that you'd guess he was great grandfather age based on his charisma and speaking style. McCain even appeared to be in his 60's. Women would have a harder time with this as they are already at a disadvantage. Yes she will run again and that will be in 2012.

[Derek]

She will most likely quit her job at State in late 2010/early 2011, then write a book or something, like all "retired" pols do.

After getting filthy rich(er), she will campaign for Dems in 2012 and '14, and maybe run for Governor or New York. I still think is a possibility because the Clintons and the Cuomos exhibit absolute hatred for eachother.

In 2016, she will be 69 (Reagan's age), but will still be younger than McCain (72), and Bob Dole (73). She may very well run that year, especially if the Liberal Messiah proves to be an effective and popular puppet Soros puppet (lol).

Short answer? Yes, because the Clintons' political ambition is like a cockroach, in that it cannot be killed.

I'm telling you she won't stop ever. Never under estimate how dangerous she is.

I'm not underestimating how dangerous she is. I have nightmares about Hillary being President of the United States!

lol. Hillary isn't a scary thought.

If you don't think 10 years in prison for hiring your own doctor to evade a universal health care prison is scary, go ahead and vote for her.

She doesn't support that. I want sources, please.

That was part of Hillary Care in 1993 which cost the democrats the house last time and will have contributed to the same thing again.

[Derek]

And her bill would've cut medicare so that teeny boppers could abort babies and screw around all they want. That's how she'd get the youth vote.

[Derek]

And her bill would've cut medicare so that teeny boppers could abort babies and screw around all they want. That's how she'd get the youth vote.

No sources? Again, I don't believe you without reliable sources.

You need sources to understand teenagers and the lack of responsibility in our nation? I use something most scholars and elitists don't have and that's common sense.

[Derek]

And her bill would've cut medicare so that teeny boppers could abort babies and screw around all they want. That's how she'd get the youth vote.

No sources? Again, I don't believe you without reliable sources.

You need sources to understand teenagers and the lack of responsibility in our nation? I use something most scholars and elitists don't have and that's common sense.

No, I need sources to verify your claim that her bill would've cut Medicare.

There is no bill to cite. It's hard to tell what she'd do. One part of the month she'd work with the GOP and another part of the same month, she'd be on everyone's bad side.

[Derek]

And her bill would've cut medicare so that teeny boppers could abort babies and screw around all they want. That's how she'd get the youth vote.

No sources? Again, I don't believe you without reliable sources.

You need sources to understand teenagers and the lack of responsibility in our nation? I use something most scholars and elitists don't have and that's common sense.

No, I need sources to verify your claim that her bill would've cut Medicare.

There is no bill to cite. It's hard to tell what she'd do. One part of the month she'd work with the GOP and another part of the same month, she'd be on everyone's bad side.

Then I don't believe you. All of what you say is your opinion. Nothing more.

It's not opinion. Haven't you realized the difference between opinions and common sense. Common sense would suggest that Hillary's bill would've been a duplicate of the one in 1993 because not only could Bill not control the country, he couldn't control his own household.

[Derek]

And her bill would've cut medicare so that teeny boppers could abort babies and screw around all they want. That's how she'd get the youth vote.

No sources? Again, I don't believe you without reliable sources.

You need sources to understand teenagers and the lack of responsibility in our nation? I use something most scholars and elitists don't have and that's common sense.

No, I need sources to verify your claim that her bill would've cut Medicare.

There is no bill to cite. It's hard to tell what she'd do. One part of the month she'd work with the GOP and another part of the same month, she'd be on everyone's bad side.

Then I don't believe you. All of what you say is your opinion. Nothing more.

It's not opinion. Haven't you realized the difference between opinions and common sense. Common sense would suggest that Hillary's bill would've been a duplicate of the one in 1993 because not only could Bill not control the country, he couldn't control his own household.

lol. Common sense would suggest that Hillary would try to pass a different bill because her 1993 bill failed. And I still haven't seen any sources from you about her 1993 bill, and thus I think what you're saying is all conservative lies.

I'm talking about in 1993 and you also know that. Stop trying to make it sound like I'm saying something that you want to debate with. All conservative lies, right that sounds very educated and intelligent.