Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 20, 2014, 06:33:33 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  Should zoosexuality be legal?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Print
Poll
Question: .
Yes   -32 (23.4%)
No   -105 (76.6%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 136

Author Topic: Should zoosexuality be legal?  (Read 13835 times)
kobidobidog
Rookie
*
Posts: 43
View Profile
« Reply #50 on: June 02, 2011, 12:45:56 am »
Ignore

The cruelty is being done to the zoo, and unwittingly to the soul of the condemner. do unto others will apply to the one condemning. Don't want to have your body, and soul turned to ashes when God judges the living,and the dead, and you will legalize zoo, and hug instead of hate wishing ill will to your neighbor.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14585


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: June 02, 2011, 01:17:37 am »
Ignore

You registered for this site to defend zoophilia.  You have no posts in any thread except this one.  You have the word "dog" in your name.
Logged

Snowstalker   mikado is content with only questions
23:03   Snowstalker   questions never helped anyone
23:03   Snowstalker   only answers
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34870


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: June 02, 2011, 01:22:27 pm »
Ignore

Surely the animal is giving consent if it is a male animal entering a female (or male if you want to do that) human. In which case that should be fine, yes?

Really our laws regarding treatment of animals are contradictory, arbitrarily decided and don't really make any sense.
Logged

Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34959
India
View Profile
« Reply #53 on: June 02, 2011, 01:59:15 pm »
Ignore

You registered for this site to defend zoophilia.  You have no posts in any thread except this one.  You have the word "dog" in your name.

What's interesting, Mikado, is his email pops up a real FB page.......so he's probably not a sock.  Go figure.
Logged

Grumpy Santa's helpers.   Cheesy

Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31079
United States


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: June 02, 2011, 03:04:48 pm »
Ignore

What's interesting, Mikado, is his email pops up a real FB page.

Does it show him wearing a furry costume?
Logged



Real Americans (and Big Sky Bob) demand to know.


I just slept for 11 hours, so I should need a nap today, but we'll see.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23784
Iceland


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.48

View Profile
« Reply #55 on: June 02, 2011, 03:11:44 pm »
Ignore

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Kobidobidog

It appears we have an internet star amongst us.
Logged


I'm a teenaged male. Everything is wrong with me.
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34959
India
View Profile
« Reply #56 on: June 02, 2011, 03:17:22 pm »
Ignore

What's interesting, Mikado, is his email pops up a real FB page.

Does it show him wearing a furry costume?

I don't know......the profile pic is a dog.
Logged

Grumpy Santa's helpers.   Cheesy

I Can't Believe It's Not Murder!
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12917


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: June 02, 2011, 03:42:58 pm »
Ignore

(Trying really hard to hijack this abortion of a discussion)

Uhh....is sex with an Alien or humainoid alien bestiality?

(/Trying really hard to hijack this abortion of a discussion)
Logged


Effective policing requires to know when backing down is in the best interest of public safety.  By all accounts, the culture of the Ferguson Police was ignorant of that fact, and instead treated Cartman of South Park as a role model for how to be a police officer.
CitizenX
Full Member
***
Posts: 189
United States


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: June 02, 2011, 10:05:32 pm »
Ignore

No, you can't have sex with a living thing you can't get consent from.

     Correct me if I am wrong, but I suspect that you eat animal meat as part of your diet. Clearly that would indicate that you do not think they are subject to the non-aggression axiom. If aggression against animals is not wrong & killing them for food is permissible, then why would sexual activity with animals be wrong?

Would you rather be killed then eaten or ph-cked in the @$$ then killed and eaten.  Obviously the being ph-cked in the @$$ thing adds a whole other dimension to the scenario.
Logged

I can't stand tattletales on internet forums
IDS Judicial Overlord PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22617
United States


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: June 02, 2011, 11:54:43 pm »
Ignore

No, you can't have sex with a living thing you can't get consent from.

     Correct me if I am wrong, but I suspect that you eat animal meat as part of your diet. Clearly that would indicate that you do not think they are subject to the non-aggression axiom. If aggression against animals is not wrong & killing them for food is permissible, then why would sexual activity with animals be wrong?

Would you rather be killed then eaten or ph-cked in the @$$ then killed and eaten.  Obviously the being ph-cked in the @$$ thing adds a whole other dimension to the scenario.

     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.
Logged

The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14585


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: June 03, 2011, 01:18:44 am »
Ignore

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Kobidobidog

It appears we have an internet star amongst us.

I don't approve of their redesign.
Logged

Snowstalker   mikado is content with only questions
23:03   Snowstalker   questions never helped anyone
23:03   Snowstalker   only answers
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34959
India
View Profile
« Reply #61 on: June 03, 2011, 08:05:50 am »
Ignore


Ugh, I wish I hadn't clicked on that.
Logged

Grumpy Santa's helpers.   Cheesy

CitizenX
Full Member
***
Posts: 189
United States


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: June 03, 2011, 03:42:08 pm »
Ignore


     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.

Yes but its still a concern.

It is difficult for most omnivirous Americans to get all the nutrients they need as is.  People's knowledge of nutrition is appauling.  Do you really think the average American can properly implement a vegetarian diet?  From a public health point of view an omnivorous lifestyle is essential.  I don't think the same can be said for the alternative lifestyle you are advocating.
Logged

I can't stand tattletales on internet forums
IDS Judicial Overlord PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22617
United States


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: June 03, 2011, 04:55:31 pm »
Ignore


     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.

Yes but its still a concern.

It is difficult for most omnivirous Americans to get all the nutrients they need as is.  People's knowledge of nutrition is appauling.  Do you really think the average American can properly implement a vegetarian diet?  From a public health point of view an omnivorous lifestyle is essential.  I don't think the same can be said for the alternative lifestyle you are advocating.


     It is a concern in regards to myself & other humans. To anthropomorphize does not extend my concern beyond those bounds. Earlier in this topic I made the argument against extending legal protections to animals.

     I am not advocating any alternative lifestyle, & I would prefer to not be mischaracterized in such a fashion. Rather, I am arguing against its illegality. Besides, lack of necessity is always the weakest argument against legalization, because many things are non-necessary & still legal. I suppose there is a point to make that proscription becomes an entertainable hypothesis in the case of non-necessity, but the idea that proscription being entertainable means that it should be entertained is a rather large leap. Movies are non-essential to our health, yet hardly anyone would advocate banning them.

     Even if we were to assume that it was ethically sound for the government to concern itself with any random aspect of people's lives, it is hardly worth the resources to punish all perpetrators of all things that are dictated crimes. In the grand scheme of things, I regard dog-****ing as being a rather minor issue, at least when compared to crimes perpetrated against humans.
Logged

CitizenX
Full Member
***
Posts: 189
United States


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: June 03, 2011, 05:08:21 pm »
Ignore


     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.

Yes but its still a concern.

It is difficult for most omnivirous Americans to get all the nutrients they need as is.  People's knowledge of nutrition is appauling.  Do you really think the average American can properly implement a vegetarian diet?  From a public health point of view an omnivorous lifestyle is essential.  I don't think the same can be said for the alternative lifestyle you are advocating.


     It is a concern in regards to myself & other humans. To anthropomorphize does not extend my concern beyond those bounds. Earlier in this topic I made the argument against extending legal protections to animals.

     I am not advocating any alternative lifestyle, & I would prefer to not be mischaracterized in such a fashion. Rather, I am arguing against its illegality. Besides, lack of necessity is always the weakest argument against legalization, because many things are non-necessary & still legal. I suppose there is a point to make that proscription becomes an entertainable hypothesis in the case of non-necessity, but the idea that proscription being entertainable means that it should be entertained is a rather large leap. Movies are non-essential to our health, yet hardly anyone would advocate banning them.

     Even if we were to assume that it was ethically sound for the government to concern itself with any random aspect of people's lives, it is hardly worth the resources to punish all perpetrators of all things that are dictated crimes. In the grand scheme of things, I regard dog-****ing as being a rather minor issue, at least when compared to crimes perpetrated against humans.

Well you've called this lifestyle an "issue" and a "concern."  Movies are indeed for the most part nonessential.   But they are not an "issue" or "concern" and therefor not in the same category as this lifestyle.

Just because something is illegal doesn't mean you should get a life sentence for doing it.  A fine, probation, or brief incarceration at a minimum security facility might be enough to do the job common sense clearly didn't do for these people.  And you can escalate it.  Maybe a fine and the issue is permanently dropped from their record if they don't re-offend during the next 3yrs.  If they repeat maybe a fine and probation.  Something like that.

The other thing is the law can me enforced if the police stumble across it or you report your neighbor, but there shouldn't be millions of dollars in police resources spent chasing people all over the place.
Logged

I can't stand tattletales on internet forums
IDS Judicial Overlord PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22617
United States


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: June 03, 2011, 05:24:18 pm »
Ignore


     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.

Yes but its still a concern.

It is difficult for most omnivirous Americans to get all the nutrients they need as is.  People's knowledge of nutrition is appauling.  Do you really think the average American can properly implement a vegetarian diet?  From a public health point of view an omnivorous lifestyle is essential.  I don't think the same can be said for the alternative lifestyle you are advocating.


     It is a concern in regards to myself & other humans. To anthropomorphize does not extend my concern beyond those bounds. Earlier in this topic I made the argument against extending legal protections to animals.

     I am not advocating any alternative lifestyle, & I would prefer to not be mischaracterized in such a fashion. Rather, I am arguing against its illegality. Besides, lack of necessity is always the weakest argument against legalization, because many things are non-necessary & still legal. I suppose there is a point to make that proscription becomes an entertainable hypothesis in the case of non-necessity, but the idea that proscription being entertainable means that it should be entertained is a rather large leap. Movies are non-essential to our health, yet hardly anyone would advocate banning them.

     Even if we were to assume that it was ethically sound for the government to concern itself with any random aspect of people's lives, it is hardly worth the resources to punish all perpetrators of all things that are dictated crimes. In the grand scheme of things, I regard dog-****ing as being a rather minor issue, at least when compared to crimes perpetrated against humans.

Well you've called this lifestyle an "issue" and a "concern."  Movies are indeed for the most part nonessential.   But they are not an "issue" or "concern" and therefor not in the same category as this lifestyle.

Just because something is illegal doesn't mean you should get a life sentence for doing it.  A fine, probation, or brief incarceration at a minimum security facility might be enough to do the job common sense clearly didn't do for these people.  And you can escalate it.  Maybe a fine and the issue is permanently dropped from their record if they don't re-offend during the next 3yrs.  If they repeat maybe a fine and probation.  Something like that.

The other thing is the law can me enforced if the police stumble across it or you report your neighbor, but there shouldn't be millions of dollars in police resources spent chasing people all over the place.

     Some cinematic content is a concern, though. Perhaps video games, particularly violent ones, would be a better example.

     While I am reticent to enshrine any such notion as animal rights in the law, making it a minor offense would be an acceptable compromise to me. Sort of like how marijuana possession is the lowest priority offense in San Francisco.
Logged

Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31079
United States


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: June 03, 2011, 09:16:23 pm »
Ignore

Given our new furry friend's attempt at biblical justification, I actually can't wait for jmfcst to get here.
Logged



Real Americans (and Big Sky Bob) demand to know.


I just slept for 11 hours, so I should need a nap today, but we'll see.
CitizenX
Full Member
***
Posts: 189
United States


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: June 03, 2011, 11:54:20 pm »
Ignore


     If I'm going to be killed & eaten, then being raped is something of a secondary concern. That aside, my point there was that if you think killing & eating an animal is alright, I find it slightly odd to take a moral stance against having sex with it. The sex part would likely cause it discomfort, but the animals that get turned into our food lead highly miserable lives.

Yes but its still a concern.

It is difficult for most omnivirous Americans to get all the nutrients they need as is.  People's knowledge of nutrition is appauling.  Do you really think the average American can properly implement a vegetarian diet?  From a public health point of view an omnivorous lifestyle is essential.  I don't think the same can be said for the alternative lifestyle you are advocating.


     It is a concern in regards to myself & other humans. To anthropomorphize does not extend my concern beyond those bounds. Earlier in this topic I made the argument against extending legal protections to animals.

     I am not advocating any alternative lifestyle, & I would prefer to not be mischaracterized in such a fashion. Rather, I am arguing against its illegality. Besides, lack of necessity is always the weakest argument against legalization, because many things are non-necessary & still legal. I suppose there is a point to make that proscription becomes an entertainable hypothesis in the case of non-necessity, but the idea that proscription being entertainable means that it should be entertained is a rather large leap. Movies are non-essential to our health, yet hardly anyone would advocate banning them.

     Even if we were to assume that it was ethically sound for the government to concern itself with any random aspect of people's lives, it is hardly worth the resources to punish all perpetrators of all things that are dictated crimes. In the grand scheme of things, I regard dog-****ing as being a rather minor issue, at least when compared to crimes perpetrated against humans.

Well you've called this lifestyle an "issue" and a "concern."  Movies are indeed for the most part nonessential.   But they are not an "issue" or "concern" and therefor not in the same category as this lifestyle.

Just because something is illegal doesn't mean you should get a life sentence for doing it.  A fine, probation, or brief incarceration at a minimum security facility might be enough to do the job common sense clearly didn't do for these people.  And you can escalate it.  Maybe a fine and the issue is permanently dropped from their record if they don't re-offend during the next 3yrs.  If they repeat maybe a fine and probation.  Something like that.

The other thing is the law can me enforced if the police stumble across it or you report your neighbor, but there shouldn't be millions of dollars in police resources spent chasing people all over the place.

     Some cinematic content is a concern, though. Perhaps video games, particularly violent ones, would be a better example.

     While I am reticent to enshrine any such notion as animal rights in the law, making it a minor offense would be an acceptable compromise to me. Sort of like how marijuana possession is the lowest priority offense in San Francisco.

Well I think that's the point.  Government serves a role but obviously nowadays it is overreaching.  Government action is not currently governed by good scientific or sociological data.  Someone wakes up one day and blames everything on drugs.  We then proceed in a completely unscientific manner to wreak havoc domestically and abroad and end up with as many drug addicts as we had before.

Marijuana should be totally legal.  It should be up to schools and employers to drug test if they want to and come up with their own penalties.  But we should not me spending billions locking up nonviolent recreational pot smokers.  Its a total waste of money and an extreme overreach by federal and local government.
Logged

I can't stand tattletales on internet forums
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14585


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: June 04, 2011, 01:25:13 am »
Ignore

Is it bad that I find CitizenX nearly as weird in manner as the dogf**ker?
Logged

Snowstalker   mikado is content with only questions
23:03   Snowstalker   questions never helped anyone
23:03   Snowstalker   only answers
realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6854
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #69 on: June 04, 2011, 01:56:20 am »
Ignore

Is it bad that I find CitizenX nearly as weird in manner as the dogf**ker?

He has a bold fetish.
Logged

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return."
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13769
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #70 on: June 04, 2011, 04:02:40 am »
Ignore

Logged

Jackson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 615
United States


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: June 05, 2011, 02:23:09 am »
Ignore

Delete this thread, and nothing of value would be lost.
Logged

only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58775
India


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: June 05, 2011, 04:01:38 pm »
Ignore

So... peeps... the question has to be asked... what about animals having sex with other animals? As in, animals of other species?

I'd seen this one before, as a gif and somewhat shorter IIRC, but I gotta say, I'm surprised just how effing much bun-on-kitty action there is on youtube. So... do you agree that this rabbit is indeed consenting to zoosexual acts?
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39403
United States


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: June 05, 2011, 05:15:58 pm »
Ignore

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Kobidobidog

It appears we have an internet star amongst us.

Oh my. The plot thickens.
Logged

realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6854
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #74 on: June 05, 2011, 06:10:56 pm »
Ignore

I like how one of kobi's arguments is that "if the animal doesn't fight back, it must be consenting". By that logic...
Logged

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return."
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines