Tea Party movement spreads to military
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:23:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Tea Party movement spreads to military
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Tea Party movement spreads to military  (Read 1812 times)
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 14, 2010, 01:46:16 AM »

So insurrection has slowly begun:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/tea_party_movement_spreads_to_military.php?ref=fpb

The Tea Party movement has gained a foothold in the armed forces.

A new Tea Party group, Armed Forces Tea Party Patriots, has grown quickly since being launched last month by an active duty Marine Corps sergeant. The group, which vows to "stand up on the very soil we defended to preserve common sense conservatism and defend our Constitution that is threatened by a tyrannical government," currently has over 400 members, who have signed up through its Facebook page, though many are not active duty military. And it has close ties to the broader Tea Party movement.

"People in the military need to be heard," the group's prime organizer, Gary Stein -- a Marine Corps sergeant stationed at Camp Pendleton in southern California -- told TPMmuckraker in an interview. "Our opinions do count."

Many people in the military "feel like they can't speak out against Obama or Congress," said Stein. "The armed forces should have a little bit more say than we think we do," he said.

Stein said he had served in the Marine Corps for seven years, including service in Iraq. He described himself as a "strong conservative" who had found himself disillusioned with the GOP. Stein formed the new group, he said, after finding like-minded cohorts on his base, then co-ordinating with a friend who's active in a local southern California Tea Party chapter.

The Armed Forces Tea Party Patriots have quickly gained a profile in the larger Tea Party movement. Stein was among Tea Party leaders quoted in a statement sent out by the Tea Party Patriots today, responding to the formation of a Tea Party federation. "In the Armed Forces we wear the same uniform, have the same haircut, and swore the same oath, but have different thoughts," Stein said in the statement. "We have come together as a band of brothers and sisters in uniform to stand for what is right. We share a life that unique only to us, we share a Tea Party that unique to us. We are the Armed Forces Tea Party Patriots and our voice will be heard!"

Indeed, the Tea Party Patriots appear to have sought out the Armed Forces group, perhaps to imbue the broader movement with a military seal of approval. Yesterday, Greg Holloway, who co-ordinated the Tea Party Patriots' statement in response to the federation, posted a message on the Armed Forces group's Facebook page saying, "We have a tea party press release and would like to include you," and asking for a contact person.

In promoting the Armed Forces Tea Party Patriots, Stein has raised the possibility of disobeying presidential orders. In one recent online posting, he wrote:
My oath was to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and that oath will be kept. I won't "Just follow" orders. There is at this time a debate within the ranks of the military regarding their oath. Some mistakenly believe they must follow any order the President issues. But many others do understand that their loyalty is to the Constitution and to the people...
That declaration echoes one made by the Oath Keepers, a group of current and former military and law enforcement personnel who havevowed not to follow orders deemed to be unconstitutional -- including any orders to disarm Americans. Stein agreed that the two groups are kindred spirits. "I think we're very like-minded with the Oathkeepers," he said. "I strongly support the Oathkeepers."

Stein's political activism seems to have raised some concern among his superiors. Late last month, he wrote online: "Was just told by a Marine Corps Officer to watch what I say about Obama... I think not..." And later that same day: "I was just told to keep my opinons (sic) to myself about Obama, by my Officer-in-Charge (OIC)."

Indeed, Stein may be violating military policies that restrict political statements and activities by active duty personnel. "I've seen military command go against people on a lot less," Mike Lebowitz, a former JAG lawyer who's an expert on issues of military expression, told TPMmuckraker. Lebowitz said one key question is whether the activity is judged to be "partisan." Though the Tea Party movement has formed political parties in a few states, and has endorsed and supported candidates in some races, there's no evidence that Stein's group has done so.

Still, Richard Rosen, an expert on military law at Texas Tech School of Law, said Stein's activities sound borderline. "At some point it becomes very close to crossing the line of partisanship," he said.

And Eugene Fidell, who teaches military law at Yale Law School, told TPMmuckraker that taking a leadership role with any political group is "problematic." But Fidell added that the military is usually loath to prosecute such acts, for fear of creating political martyrs.

This isn't the first time that anti-Obama sentiment has surfaced within the military. Several active duty service members have challenged their orders to deploy overseas, on the grounds that President Obama was not born in the U.S. and his orders are therefore illegitimate.

For Stein, Tea Party activism is a natural offshoot of the military's main mission. "The U.S. military has been around for over 200 years," serving America by deploying to war-zones around the world, he said. "Now its time to do what we need to do to get this country moving in the right direction."

Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2010, 01:57:29 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2010, 03:16:48 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.

By comparison 263,402 are fans of tacos.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2010, 03:26:52 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.

Why would someone from outside the military even join the group?

Leave it to Facebook.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2010, 03:30:27 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.

Why would someone from outside the military even join the group?

Leave it to Facebook.

After looking it up, it appears by "over 400" they meant 32.
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2010, 03:45:57 AM »

If the word retarded was ever appropriate, it most certainly is here....
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2010, 03:49:22 AM »

If the word retarded was ever appropriate, it most certainly is here....

Then you haven't seen much of what humanity has to offer.
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2010, 03:59:05 AM »

If the word retarded was ever appropriate, it most certainly is here....

Then you haven't seen much of what humanity has to offer.

Oh trust me, I've seen plenty...
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2010, 04:33:43 AM »

Back in the real world....link
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2010, 05:16:47 AM »

Isn't it considered insubordination for active military personnel to publicly protest against their Commander in Chief?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2010, 05:30:02 AM »

Yes....sort of.  You can do political type stuff, including protest, but you can't do it in uniform.  I'm looking for a good cite.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2010, 05:49:24 AM »

Officers can't ever say bad things about the CINC, cite-UCMJ Article 88
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But since the douche in question is just enlisted he is free from this.  On the other hand, as he is clearly claiming to be active duty and then talking sh**t, he is on thin ice.  There is a lot of info here and here.  A couple of relevant bits:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
He is real close on a few of those.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2010, 08:02:22 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.

By comparison 263,402 are fans of tacos.

...

Very well, I'll accept them as our new overlords on the condition that they all use soft taco shells.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,733


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2010, 12:56:21 AM »

400 Facebook members (many not in the military) does not an insurrection make.

By comparison 263,402 are fans of tacos.

CmdrTaco does very well on some polls on Slashdot.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2010, 01:17:00 AM »

Isn't it considered insubordination for active military personnel to publicly protest against their Commander in Chief?

I would love to see these in Guantanamo.
Logged
sbos_wx
Newbie
*
Posts: 9
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2010, 08:14:33 AM »

Will make quite the interesting court case.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2010, 12:50:10 AM »

update
Looks like he could get 3 years, but will probably just be discharged.  Insurrection indeed. Roll Eyes

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2010, 02:00:04 AM »

F***wit
Logged
beneficii
Rookie
**
Posts: 159


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2010, 10:45:03 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Huh

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
(emphasis added)
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2010, 10:54:19 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Huh

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
(emphasis added)


The person from the original post was a Sgt.

As for the LtCol. he should go to Leavenworth for at least a few months as an example.
Logged
Mr. Taft Republican
Taft4Prez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2010, 08:01:05 PM »

Can troops form unions? I'm a future marine, I would find the concept of a Federation of Military Laborers rather interesting
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,337
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2010, 08:32:19 PM »

Can troops form unions? I'm a future marine, I would find the concept of a Federation of Military Laborers rather interesting
no
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2010, 09:39:38 PM »

IIRC, Dutch soldiers have a union.  However, no, US troops are not allowed to form a union, nor should they.
Logged
Mr. Taft Republican
Taft4Prez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 16, 2010, 09:16:58 AM »

I suppose that makes sense, if it were somewhere like Russia I'd say enlisted soldiers NEED a union, but not here.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 16, 2010, 09:30:48 AM »

IIRC, Dutch soldiers have a union.  However, no, US troops are not allowed to form a union, nor should they.

There is a federation of police in the UK which I suppose is similar to a union, though strikes are banned. I don't know if the military has one, but I doubt strikes would be legal in any military union even if they did exist.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 11 queries.