CA: Rasmussen: Boxer leads in reelection campaign (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:32:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  CA: Rasmussen: Boxer leads in reelection campaign (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: Rasmussen: Boxer leads in reelection campaign  (Read 1964 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« on: April 17, 2010, 02:57:47 PM »

Next time you add a CA senate poll, assume that Campbell is the nominee and use those numbers. Much more accurate.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2010, 03:02:07 PM »

It's an anti-incumbent vote, with the public at large knowing very little about any of the Republican candidates.

     Based on that, it is hard to tell how the race will turn out yet. A Republican running for statewide office in California generally cannot win on anti-incumbent sentiment alone.

Campbell has what it takes to win, imo, but it's going to be that much harder to beat a democrat in a federal race, rather than a statewide race. He would have had a much easier time becoming governor. Whitman is a worse candidate than him and even she has a good chance of becoming governor, and depending on how Brown runs, she might even be the favorite.

Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2010, 04:03:55 PM »

It's an anti-incumbent vote, with the public at large knowing very little about any of the Republican candidates.

     Based on that, it is hard to tell how the race will turn out yet. A Republican running for statewide office in California generally cannot win on anti-incumbent sentiment alone.

Campbell has what it takes to win, imo, but it's going to be that much harder to beat a democrat in a federal race, rather than a statewide race. He would have had a much easier time becoming governor. Whitman is a worse candidate than him and even she has a good chance of becoming governor, and depending on how Brown runs, she might even be the favorite.

Some people just don't want to be in the executive branch over the legislative branch, and visa-versa. The jobs are very different.

So why was he running for governor for the longest time?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.