Make Devilman change his signature

[segwaystyle2012]

Breasts are not private parts on women if they aren't for men, you discriminatory hicks.

I'm not even going to touch this one.. BTW How have you been Hammy?

Good and you?

Good aswell. How is the weather in MA this time of year? I think I might move to Boston if I can save up the money and get some things in line.

I'm living in Connecticut right now, the weather is beautiful. I also was able to find a pretty nice hotel so I think I will settle here for a while.

Oh, well, I hope your hotel bill doesn't cost you alot. Unless someone else is paying for it, then who cares right.

I'm very persuasive (and also very poor) so I was able to hook it here for free.

Ah, I see. Why did you leave MA? If you don't mind me asking.

You mean ME right? I haven't lived there since I was 15. I'm chillin' in Connecticut because I was looking for a job here. I've been through three states in three months (WA, FL, and CT).

[Devilman88]

BTW, for those who don't know what private part are you can read it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimate_part

[Devilman88]

Breasts are not private parts on women if they aren't for men, you discriminatory hicks.

I'm not even going to touch this one.. BTW How have you been Hammy?

Good and you?

Good aswell. How is the weather in MA this time of year? I think I might move to Boston if I can save up the money and get some things in line.

I'm living in Connecticut right now, the weather is beautiful. I also was able to find a pretty nice hotel so I think I will settle here for a while.

Oh, well, I hope your hotel bill doesn't cost you alot. Unless someone else is paying for it, then who cares right.

I'm very persuasive (and also very poor) so I was able to hook it here for free.

Ah, I see. Why did you leave MA? If you don't mind me asking.

You mean ME right? I haven't lived there since I was 15. I'm chillin' in Connecticut because I was looking for a job here. I've been through three states in three months (WA, FL, and CT).

Ah I see, well I hope you find a job, they are hard to come by, I should know, I've been looking for one for over a year now. I got laid off..

[segwaystyle2012]

Breasts are not private parts on women if they aren't for men, you discriminatory hicks.

I'm not even going to touch this one.. BTW How have you been Hammy?

Good and you?

Good aswell. How is the weather in MA this time of year? I think I might move to Boston if I can save up the money and get some things in line.

I'm living in Connecticut right now, the weather is beautiful. I also was able to find a pretty nice hotel so I think I will settle here for a while.

Oh, well, I hope your hotel bill doesn't cost you alot. Unless someone else is paying for it, then who cares right.

I'm very persuasive (and also very poor) so I was able to hook it here for free.

Ah, I see. Why did you leave MA? If you don't mind me asking.

You mean ME right? I haven't lived there since I was 15. I'm chillin' in Connecticut because I was looking for a job here. I've been through three states in three months (WA, FL, and CT).

Ah I see, well I hope you find a job, they are hard to come by, I should know, I've been looking for one for over a year now. I got laid off..

Thanks good luck to you too.

[Lunar]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.  IMO Libertas is incredibly, um, let's think of a nice word, foolish, to push this as his pet issue.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

[segwaystyle2012]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

Again, how, exactly, is Libertas' signature any worse than Devilman's?

[Senator Libertas]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

And why is mine a problem but devilman's is not? Mine is only there as a protest of devilman being allowed to put highly suggestive sexual imagery in his signature.

[Lunar]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

And why is mine a problem but devilman's is not? Mine is only there as a protest of devilman being allowed to put highly suggestive sexual imagery in his signature.

1.  I think one is viewed as more graphically explicit by school & office computer censors.  That's the biggest difference.

2.  You can be stupid foolish if you want.  I just expect this one to bite you, and breaking the rules because, in your opinion, someone else is breaking the rules is no more an excuse here than it is breaking the law in real life.  Try robbing a convenience store and arguing that corporate tax loopholes allow plenty of people to steal and you're just making a statement.

3.  GETTING IN PETTY GRAPHICALLY EXPLICIT TIT-FOR-TAT BS IS HIGHLY ANNOYING AND HAS A VERY LOW PROBABILITY OF RESULTING IN A NET GAIN FOR YOU.

[segwaystyle2012]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

And why is mine a problem but devilman's is not? Mine is only there as a protest of devilman being allowed to put highly suggestive sexual imagery in his signature.

1.  I think one is viewed as more graphically explicit by school & office computer censors.  That's the biggest difference.

2.  You can be stupid foolish if you want.  I just expect this one to bite you, and breaking the rules because, in your opinion, someone else is breaking the rules is no more an excuse here than it is breaking the law in real life.  Try robbing a convenience store and arguing that corporate tax loopholes allow plenty of people to steal and you're just making a statement.

3.  GETTING IN PETTY GRAPHICALLY EXPLICIT TIT-FOR-TAT BS IS HIGHLY ANNOYING AND HAS A VERY LOW PROBABILITY OF RESULTING IN A NET GAIN FOR YOU.

Judging by the lack of discipline on Devilman, he wasn't breaking the rules. Following that logic neither is Libertas.

[Senator Libertas]

Why does anyone have signatures turned on anyway?  The viewing experience is 100x better without them.

Might want to take a look at Libertas' right now, just for a second, since he's apparently decided to continue his obvious troublemaking.

The moderators are aware.

Dave will probably view that as the type of thing which conflicts with this site's mission to be available on school/educational computer.

I don't think Dave is interested in making his site some sort of political statement about gender, I think he's primarily interested in it being safe for work and school.

And why is mine a problem but devilman's is not? Mine is only there as a protest of devilman being allowed to put highly suggestive sexual imagery in his signature.

1.  I think one is viewed as more graphically explicit by school & office computer censors.  That's the biggest difference.

2.  You can be stupid foolish if you want.  I just expect this one to bite you, and breaking the rules because, in your opinion, someone else is breaking the rules is no more an excuse here than it is breaking the law in real life.  Try robbing a convenience store and arguing that corporate tax loopholes allow plenty of people to steal and you're just making a statement.

3.  GETTING IN PETTY GRAPHICALLY EXPLICIT TIT-FOR-TAT BS IS HIGHLY ANNOYING AND HAS A VERY LOW PROBABILITY OF RESULTING IN A NET GAIN FOR YOU.

All I'm asking for is some consistent moderating please. I would love to go back to my regular signature, but I want to be able to keep signatures on without being subjected to Devilman's pornography. Just ask him to change it, please.

[Lunar]

Okay, I'm asking everyone to change their signatures so they can be reasonably glanced at on a school computer.  I don't care about societal standards, making a statement, or what that other guy did (worst excuse ever), or gender imbalances, just basic viewability on public workspaces.

There.

I just did.

Expect high powers to get involved if you continue.

[Senator Libertas]

The hypocritical reactions here definitely highlight a serious problem on this forum: heterosexuals are treated as second-class citizens. Well enough is enough. We're sick of the double standard straight Americans are subjected to by these haters.

[Vepres]

Okay, I'm asking everyone to change their signatures so they can be reasonably glanced at on a school computer.  I don't care about societal standards, making a statement, or what that other guy did (worst excuse ever), or gender imbalances, just basic viewability on public workspaces.

There.

I just did.

Expect high powers to get involved if you continue.

*claps*

[Lief]

Okay, I'm asking everyone to change their signatures so they can be reasonably glanced at on a school computer.  I don't care about societal standards, making a statement, or what that other guy did (worst excuse ever), or gender imbalances, just basic viewability on public workspaces.

There.

I just did.

Expect high powers to get involved if you continue.

[Senator Libertas]

Okay, I'm asking everyone to change their signatures so they can be reasonably glanced at on a school computer.  I don't care about societal standards, making a statement, or what that other guy did (worst excuse ever), or gender imbalances, just basic viewability on public workspaces.

There.

I just did.

Expect high powers to get involved if you continue.

I didn't use "what that other guy did" as an excuse. I deliberately changed it to draw attention to the issue of inappropriate signatures.

I changed mine, now I hope devilman88 will follow suit.

[bgwah]

This thread perfectly summarizes why this forum sucks so much anymore.

[Devilman88]

There I changed my sig, better

[IDS Judicial Overlord John Dibble]

The hypocritical reactions here definitely highlight a serious problem on this forum: heterosexuals are treated as second-class citizens. Well enough is enough. We're sick of the double standard straight Americans are subjected to by these haters.

Oh noes! The 95-97% supermajority is being oppressed, whatever shall they do? I know, let's make gay marriage banned in our state constitutions - that'll make things equal!

[Communists For McCain]

Facepalm at this entire thread.

The moralfaggotry of this forum never ceases to amaze me.

[Free Palestine]

Guys, if you don't stop being retards, I'm going to make this my sig:

[Communists For McCain]

Guys, if you don't stop being retards, I'm going to make this my sig:

Do it.

The politically correct traditionalists on this website need to be taught a lesson.

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

Put a cork up it. If you are allowed to say so many offensive remarks on a forum, how can you hate on a pic? It is just dumb. The ones who ask these sort of things are probably battling with the problem that the pic resembles.

[Communists For McCain]

Put a cork up it. If you are allowed to say so many offensive remarks on a forum, how can you hate on a pic? It is just dumb. The ones who ask these sort of things are probably battling with the problem that the pic resembles.

In other words repressing inner psychological urges.

[Free Palestine]

Do it.

The politically correct traditionalists on this website need to be taught a lesson.

My thought exactly.  "Hurr durr this girl doesn't have long hair or tits, and is therefor a man."

[dialectical fetishist]

Do it.

The politically correct traditionalists on this website need to be taught a lesson.

My thought exactly.  "Hurr durr this girl doesn't have long hair or tits, and is therefor a man."

No, it's not that. I don't mind short hair on a girl that much, though I have the traditional male attitude to boobs im afriad But the main problem is just that she's yuucccckkk