Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2013, 03:09:37 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2004 U.S. Presidential Election
2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
Author
Topic: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops (Read 13435 times)
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #25 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:16:14 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:07:59 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:04:19 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 05:50:33 pm
They weren't given orders to secure the site. I blame the higher ups, not the rank and file.
Perhaps, in the case shown on the videotape, because
it was in the perimeter of the US Forces?
What?
J
fool
according to the tape, the bunker that was videotaped was within the security perimeter of the US incampment. Maybe you need to pay attention when you watch the video tape.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #26 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:17:57 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:16:14 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:07:59 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:04:19 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 05:50:33 pm
They weren't given orders to secure the site. I blame the higher ups, not the rank and file.
Perhaps, in the case shown on the videotape, because
it was in the perimeter of the US Forces?
What?
J
fool
according to the tape, the bunker that was videotaped was within the security perimeter of the US incampment. Maybe you need to pay attention when you watch the video tape.
GPS put it at right by the facility. And there's those IAEA seals, and explosives that appear to be HMX.
Keep spinning.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #27 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:23:11 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:16:03 pm
It just proves you're using smaller trucks. Yawn.
The weapons inspectors say that it was HMX. You might want to read the updated part. It's over for Bush.
Let me try to dumb this down for you. If each truck can carry 9 tons, and they make one trip per day, it takes 40 days to move the explosives. There was a 20 day period between the video tape and when the army did the inspection.
They still have the problem of doing it,
within the perimeter
of a Brigade of Airborne. After 10 or 15 trips, somebody will notice something.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #28 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:24:50 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:23:11 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:16:03 pm
It just proves you're using smaller trucks. Yawn.
The weapons inspectors say that it was HMX. You might want to read the updated part. It's over for Bush.
Let me try to dumb this down for you. If each truck can carry 9 tons, and they make one trip per day, it takes 40 days to move the explosives. There was a 20 day period between the video tape and when the army did the inspection.
They still have the problem of doing it,
within the perimeter
of a Brigade of Airborne. After 10 or 15 trips, somebody will notice something.
The area was
NOT SECURED
. So 2 of your smaller trucks per day. Whatever.
Why should I have to explain how they might have been taken after we confirmed they were still there?
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #29 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:28:04 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:17:57 pm
GPS put it at right by the facility. And there's those IAEA seals, and explosives that appear to be HMX.
Keep spinning.
As you pointed out the facility was large; neither the newscrew nor the soldiers identifuied it as such. Of course, you can, j
fool
, from a grainy internet video, right? Because of all your experience with UN, right j
fool
?
You Dudge bust is a bust and we are all laughing at you. Soon we all be laughing at Kerry.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #30 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:31:49 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:28:04 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:17:57 pm
GPS put it at right by the facility. And there's those IAEA seals, and explosives that appear to be HMX.
Keep spinning.
As you pointed out the facility was large; neither the newscrew nor the soldiers identifuied it as such. Of course, you can, j
fool
, from a grainy internet video, right? Because of all your experience with UN, right j
fool
?
You Dudge bust is a bust and we are all laughing at you. Soon we all be laughing at Kerry.
WEAPONS INSPECTERS IDENTIFIED IT
You just won't admit defeat. Yawn.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #31 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:36:19 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:24:50 pm
The area was
NOT SECURED
. So 2 of your smaller trucks per day. Whatever.
Why should I have to explain how they might have been taken after we confirmed they were still there?
Well, the area is within the defensive perimeter of a brigade of the 101st Airborne, according to the video. So, it
really
is in a relatively secure place.
So now you have two trucks, "whatever," going into the perimeter, daily for 20 days, of an encampment of elements of the 101st Airborne. Then after taking time to load up the trucks, they drive down the road loaded with American convoys. That
really
makes sense, j
fool
.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #32 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:38:39 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:31:49 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:28:04 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:17:57 pm
GPS put it at right by the facility. And there's those IAEA seals, and explosives that appear to be HMX.
Keep spinning.
As you pointed out the facility was large; neither the newscrew nor the soldiers identifuied it as such. Of course, you can, j
fool
, from a grainy internet video, right? Because of all your experience with UN, right j
fool
?
You Dudge bust is a bust and we are all laughing at you. Soon we all be laughing at Kerry.
WEAPONS INSPECTERS IDENTIFIED IT
You just won't admit defeat. Yawn.
No they didn't; that's the problem. They did identify a seal, not what was for. We also have all of this happening within the parimeter of an encampment of US forces.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: IAEA seals removed videotaped by embedded reporters
«
Reply #33 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:40:46 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:38:39 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:31:49 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 06:28:04 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 06:17:57 pm
GPS put it at right by the facility. And there's those IAEA seals, and explosives that appear to be HMX.
Keep spinning.
As you pointed out the facility was large; neither the newscrew nor the soldiers identifuied it as such. Of course, you can, j
fool
, from a grainy internet video, right? Because of all your experience with UN, right j
fool
?
You Dudge bust is a bust and we are all laughing at you. Soon we all be laughing at Kerry.
WEAPONS INSPECTERS IDENTIFIED IT
You just won't admit defeat. Yawn.
No they didn't; that's the problem. They did identify a seal, not what was for. We also have all of this happening within the parimeter of an encampment of US forces.
They say HMX
Logged
khirkhib
YaBB God
Posts: 973
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #34 on:
October 28, 2004, 06:54:09 pm »
You guys are just spinning
The HMX was there.
Than Sadam moved it before we got there.
No Russia moved it to Syria
The HMX wasn't there when the troops get there
But the HMX was there.
US troops opened some of the seals.
intelligence knew about it they didn't tell their military counterparts or conversly the military counterparts didn't do anything.
There were 500 other sites like this.
Bush was told to go in with overwhelming force. Why to secure the weapons and the bases.
Bush's team decided to go in with less forces than needed.
The terrorists are more terrorists today then there were 4 years ago.
The terrorists are better armed today than they were 4 years ago.
And I blame the president. And had this happend during a democratic presidency I would have blamed the president too. can't you detach yourself from your party for a second and see how ed up this is.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #35 on:
October 28, 2004, 07:31:26 pm »
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 06:54:09 pm
You guys are just spinning
The HMX was there.
Than Sadam moved it before we got there.
No Russia moved it to Syria
The HMX wasn't there when the troops get there
But the HMX was there.
US troops opened some of the seals.
intelligence knew about it they didn't tell their military counterparts or conversly the military counterparts didn't do anything.
There were 500 other sites like this.
Bush was told to go in with overwhelming force. Why to secure the weapons and the bases.
Bush's team decided to go in with less forces than needed.
The terrorists are more terrorists today then there were 4 years ago.
The terrorists are better armed today than they were 4 years ago.
And I blame the president. And had this happend during a democratic presidency I would have blamed the president too. can't you detach yourself from your party for a second and see how <<khirhibs's tasteless expletive deleted>> up this is.
Former weapons inspector says he can't say that it was HMX on the tape, on CNN right now.
Pentagon released a satellite photo of trucks around the bunkers from before the war but after the last inspection.
You run into the logistical problems of taking these out of the area after the Americans arrive.
There is circumstancial evidence that the explosives were not there. I've noticed that you cannot show
how
the explosives could have been removed, all 360 tons of it.
I'll be perfectly free to admit that some explosives could have been taken, if they were there. You need proof that they were there at the time the US Army showed up.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #36 on:
October 28, 2004, 07:48:45 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 07:31:26 pm
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 06:54:09 pm
You guys are just spinning
The HMX was there.
Than Sadam moved it before we got there.
No Russia moved it to Syria
The HMX wasn't there when the troops get there
But the HMX was there.
US troops opened some of the seals.
intelligence knew about it they didn't tell their military counterparts or conversly the military counterparts didn't do anything.
There were 500 other sites like this.
Bush was told to go in with overwhelming force. Why to secure the weapons and the bases.
Bush's team decided to go in with less forces than needed.
The terrorists are more terrorists today then there were 4 years ago.
The terrorists are better armed today than they were 4 years ago.
And I blame the president. And had this happend during a democratic presidency I would have blamed the president too. can't you detach yourself from your party for a second and see how <<khirhibs's tasteless expletive deleted>> up this is.
Former weapons inspector says he can't say that it was HMX on the tape, on CNN right now.
Pentagon released a satellite photo of trucks around the bunkers from before the war but after the last inspection.
You run into the logistical problems of taking these out of the area after the Americans arrive.
There is circumstancial evidence that the explosives were not there. I've noticed that you cannot show
how
the explosives could have been removed, all 360 tons of it.
I'll be perfectly free to admit that some explosives could have been taken, if they were there. You need proof that they were there at the time the US Army showed up.
Likely HMX
Definitely stuff the IAEA was guarding
And we left it unsecured
Maybe it won't convince you, but it will convince enough reasonable people that Bush is doomed.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #37 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:07:09 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 07:48:45 pm
Likely HMX
Definitely stuff the IAEA was guarding
And we left it unsecured
Maybe it won't convince you, but it will convince enough reasonable people that Bush is doomed.
They could not identify it as HMX, and they still have
not
been clear about the seal.
No, please explain how 360 tons of explosive were removed when the roads were filled with American vehicles? The story goes bust if you can't. Kerry will still probably lose if you can.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #38 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:08:16 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 08:07:09 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 07:48:45 pm
Likely HMX
Definitely stuff the IAEA was guarding
And we left it unsecured
Maybe it won't convince you, but it will convince enough reasonable people that Bush is doomed.
They could not identify it as HMX, and they still have
not
been clear about the seal.
No, please explain how 360 tons of explosive were removed when the roads were filled with American vehicles? The story goes bust if you can't. Kerry will still probably lose if you can.
We didn't have the area guarded at all for 20 days. Why should I have to explain exactly how they went into an unguarded area, and went into unlocked buildings and removed the explosives shown in that video?
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #39 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:16:35 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 08:08:16 pm
We didn't have the area guarded at all for 20 days. Why should I have to explain exactly how they went into an unguarded area, and went into unlocked buildings and removed the explosives shown in that video?
First, determine if there was something there
to
guard. You have to explain it because you have claimed it. You are claiming that it was looted in a 20 day period. Okay, how?
I frankly, from reading you posts, would bet that you coundn't.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #40 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:18:55 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 08:16:35 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 08:08:16 pm
We didn't have the area guarded at all for 20 days. Why should I have to explain exactly how they went into an unguarded area, and went into unlocked buildings and removed the explosives shown in that video?
First, determine if there was something there
to
guard. You have to explain it because you have claimed it. You are claiming that it was looted in a 20 day period. Okay, how?
I frankly, from reading you posts, would bet that you coundn't.
One can easily come up with a reasonable scenario of how it was done, but why bother with this speculation. It was there and now it's gone. I don't have to prove anything.
Logged
khirkhib
YaBB God
Posts: 973
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #41 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:27:39 pm »
Wow if Bush only had the integriaty and the intelectual honesty that you do JJ when he told America that Sadam had weapons of mass distruction. We would have never gone to war.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #42 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:30:43 pm »
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 08:27:39 pm
Wow if Bush only had the integriaty and the intelectual honesty that you do JJ when he told America that Sadam had weapons of mass distruction. We would have never gone to war.
No, I thought there
were
WMD's there, and I was wrong.
I would however like you to answer the question, even using circumstancial evidence. So far, you have not been to. I challenge you to do so.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #43 on:
October 28, 2004, 08:55:21 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 08:30:43 pm
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 08:27:39 pm
Wow if Bush only had the integriaty and the intelectual honesty that you do JJ when he told America that Sadam had weapons of mass distruction. We would have never gone to war.
No, I thought there
were
WMD's there, and I was wrong.
I would however like you to answer the question, even using circumstancial evidence. So far, you have not been to. I challenge you to do so.
One day:
20 reasonably size trucks
100 people
I think it's 380 regular tons, or 350 metric tons.
17.5 tons or 35,000 pounds per truck
Each person moves 90 pounds at a time, 400 loads, or 80 loads per person. The trucks are put right next to the storage area.
Maybe all done at night?
Logged
khirkhib
YaBB God
Posts: 973
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #44 on:
October 28, 2004, 09:04:14 pm »
jfern i think he wants specifics.
Names of the people that moved the explosives.
The license places on the cars.
when they clocked in clocked out etc.
The group portrait after they finished loading the last truck full.
We didn't have our head in the game and we lost the explosives. PERIOD. Whoops
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #45 on:
October 28, 2004, 09:09:09 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 08:55:21 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 08:30:43 pm
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 08:27:39 pm
Wow if Bush only had the integriaty and the intelectual honesty that you do JJ when he told America that Sadam had weapons of mass distruction. We would have never gone to war.
No, I thought there
were
WMD's there, and I was wrong.
I would however like you to answer the question, even using circumstancial evidence. So far, you have not been to. I challenge you to do so.
One day:
20 reasonably size trucks
100 people
I think it's 380 regular tons, or 350 metric tons.
17.5 tons or 35,000 pounds per truck
Each person moves 90 pounds at a time, 400 loads, or 80 loads per person. The trucks are put right next to the storage area.
Maybe all done at night?
Nobody's going to notice a convoy of twenty trucks rolling down the roads occupied and being used by the US Army? They are doing the loading next to an encampment of the 101 Airborne?
And to khirknib, I want you to honestly back up you claims. Jfern is at least trying here.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29155
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #46 on:
October 28, 2004, 09:46:00 pm »
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 09:09:09 pm
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 08:55:21 pm
Quote from: J. J. on October 28, 2004, 08:30:43 pm
Quote from: khirkhib on October 28, 2004, 08:27:39 pm
Wow if Bush only had the integriaty and the intelectual honesty that you do JJ when he told America that Sadam had weapons of mass distruction. We would have never gone to war.
No, I thought there
were
WMD's there, and I was wrong.
I would however like you to answer the question, even using circumstancial evidence. So far, you have not been to. I challenge you to do so.
One day:
20 reasonably size trucks
100 people
I think it's 380 regular tons, or 350 metric tons.
17.5 tons or 35,000 pounds per truck
Each person moves 90 pounds at a time, 400 loads, or 80 loads per person. The trucks are put right next to the storage area.
Maybe all done at night?
Nobody's going to notice a convoy of twenty trucks rolling down the roads occupied and being used by the US Army? They are doing the loading next to an encampment of the 101 Airborne?
And to khirknib, I want you to honestly back up you claims. Jfern is at least trying here.
Why don't you explain to me what happened to the explosives in that video?
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #47 on:
October 28, 2004, 09:49:34 pm »
Quote from: jfern on October 28, 2004, 09:46:00 pm
Why don't you explain to me what happened to the explosives in that video?
For all either of us know they have been collected and destoyed.
Now, why don't you answer my question. If the HMX was there, how was it looted? Answer the question, if you can. I'm challenging you.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
shankbear
Sr. Member
Posts: 363
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #48 on:
October 28, 2004, 11:41:32 pm »
have the interviews with the 101st troops been completely discounted? I haven't heard any more about them. Has the expectation od an OCTOBEr surprise already been factored into voters minds? How many undecided voters could there be? No DEmos or Repubs will be swayed.
Logged
Remember, we never lost a battle on the field in Vietnam, we lost the will to win the war. Never repeat it!!!
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: HMX explosives left unsecured by troops
«
Reply #49 on:
October 28, 2004, 11:46:37 pm »
Quote from: shankbear on October 28, 2004, 11:41:32 pm
have the interviews with the 101st troops been completely discounted? I haven't heard any more about them. Has the expectation od an OCTOBEr surprise already been factored into voters minds? How many undecided voters could there be? No DEmos or Repubs will be swayed.
If there was really a plausible story, e.g. 4-5 tons were missing, it would be damaging, and their wouldn't be any circumstancial evidence. Whoever planted the story blew it with the
360 metric tons[/b] part.
If you're goning to lie, make it a believable lie.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...