Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 25, 2017, 11:48:06 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderators: Beet, Apocrypha)
| | |-+  Should FDR be removed from the dime?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Poll
Question: .
Yes   -14 (24.1%)
No   -44 (75.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: Should FDR be removed from the dime?  (Read 5083 times)
Solitude Without a Window
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 46296
United States


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: May 04, 2010, 01:49:56 am »
Ignore

Yes because the idolatry of political leaders is bad.

Everybody idolatrizes the "founding fathers" and nobody finds it bad. Yet Roosevelt's role was at least as important.
Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 41014


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

View Profile
« Reply #51 on: May 04, 2010, 01:59:09 am »
Ignore

Altho, if Jackson is to be on any denomination, the $20 bill is the one he should be on, as one of the stands he took during the Bank War was that there should be no bill smaller than a $20 bill.  At the time, the highest value coin minted by the U.S. was the gold Eagle with a face value of $10. In other words, he was against the use of paper money when specie coins could in theory do the job.

Adjusting for inflation, his position is that there should be no bill smaller than a $500 bill.
Logged

Magic 8-Ball
mrk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3677
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: May 04, 2010, 02:21:19 am »
Ignore

Yes because the idolatry of political leaders is bad.

Everybody idolatrizes the "founding fathers" and nobody finds it bad. Yet Roosevelt's role was at least as important.

That...doesn't really follow.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12688
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: May 04, 2010, 05:07:49 am »
Ignore

Yes because the idolatry of political leaders is bad.

Everybody idolatrizes the "founding fathers" and nobody finds it bad.

If you follow my posts here you would realize that I don't idolize the Founding Fathers and I certainly the 'cult' that surrounds them is very poisonous to American political discourse.
Logged



Quote
Keith R Laws ‏@Keith_Laws  Feb 4
As I have noted before 'paradigm shift' is an anagram of 'grasp dim faith'
Solitude Without a Window
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 46296
United States


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: May 04, 2010, 05:37:06 am »
Ignore

Yes because the idolatry of political leaders is bad.

Everybody idolatrizes the "founding fathers" and nobody finds it bad.

If you follow my posts here you would realize that I don't idolize the Founding Fathers and I certainly the 'cult' that surrounds them is very poisonous to American political discourse.

I didn't say you did. But since Founding Fathers are nearly-unanimously praised, that Washington and Jefferson are on mount Rushmore, then if we had to apply a fair treatment FDR isn't much "idolized". Of course, it also depends to how you define idolatry.
Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33544
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #55 on: May 04, 2010, 02:22:36 pm »
Ignore

Altho, if Jackson is to be on any denomination, the $20 bill is the one he should be on, as one of the stands he took during the Bank War was that there should be no bill smaller than a $20 bill.  At the time, the highest value coin minted by the U.S. was the gold Eagle with a face value of $10. In other words, he was against the use of paper money when specie coins could in theory do the job.

Adjusting for inflation, his position is that there should be no bill smaller than a $500 bill.

Actually, a $1000 bill if one uses the value of gold as a guide, but we don't have specie currency anymore.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
My November Ballot
President: Clinton/Kaine D
US Senate: Thomas Dixon D
US House 2: Arik Bjorn D
SC Senate 20: Scott West G
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines