Why is social libertarianism so underrepresented? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:23:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why is social libertarianism so underrepresented? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is social libertarianism so underrepresented?  (Read 1551 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« on: May 01, 2010, 05:39:00 PM »

On the political compass, and in general, there is a trend towards social authoritarianism. Why is this?

Society HAS ALWAYS BEEN TRENDING TOWARD SOCIAL AUTHORITARIANISM, it's just that some people are less authoritarian than others (but those people are a very minute few).

It's the way of the world Winston, it sucks mightily but until the influences of traditionalism wear off most people will naturally incline towards certain authoritarianistic elements.

     I would venture a guess that society (American society, at least) is less socially authoritarian now than it was in the 1950s. There might be something to saying that there is a long-term trend towards social authoritarianism, but that does not really bear out as a strictly increasing function.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2010, 06:28:12 PM »

On the political compass, and in general, there is a trend towards social authoritarianism. Why is this?

Society HAS ALWAYS BEEN TRENDING TOWARD SOCIAL AUTHORITARIANISM, it's just that some people are less authoritarian than others (but those people are a very minute few).

It's the way of the world Winston, it sucks mightily but until the influences of traditionalism wear off most people will naturally incline towards certain authoritarianistic elements.

     I would venture a guess that society (American society, at least) is less socially authoritarian now than it was in the 1950s. There might be something to saying that there is a long-term trend towards social authoritarianism, but that does not really bear out as a strictly increasing function.

Right in some ways, wrong in others. America doesn't function as an ideology. We move left on some things and right on others. Gun control is less acceptable now than it was simply ten years ago, gay marriage is more acceptable. Likewise, abortion support has dropped. America has a similar relationship with economic issues.

     Agreed, it is much more complicated than simply "America is moving left on social issues" or "America is moving right on social issues". My post made the assumption that the public's views on social issues could be treated in aggregate, which is by no means a safe assumption to make.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.