The Value of Stonewall Jackson in the Civil War
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:33:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  The Value of Stonewall Jackson in the Civil War
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: The Value of Stonewall Jackson in the Civil War  (Read 9809 times)
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: June 19, 2010, 12:43:41 PM »

They would have just shifted the trans-alabama, and carolina departments, you basically had 80 to a hundred thousand troops there in garrison duty. Although they would have had to move the capital.

Lee was the dominant CSA general and the only one that Davis really liked or trusted. All the others Johnston, Beauregard were held in low esteem by Davis. With the loss of Lee and his Army, the wind would have been taken out of their efforts. Davis may have tried to hold out but no way it lasts beyond 1863.

Davis wasn't civil enough to make an adequate politician. Beauregard was perhaps one of the most underutilized and brilliant of his generals.

Agree totally Davis was a control freak, and try to control everthing from Richmond instead of delegating. His ego let one of the souths best general's sit idle for 2 years commanding the department of the carolina's.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.203 seconds with 12 queries.