Was Truman Right To Fire MacArthur?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 03:17:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Was Truman Right To Fire MacArthur?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: See Above
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Was Truman Right To Fire MacArthur?  (Read 15480 times)
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: June 03, 2010, 08:03:55 PM »

The point im making is we have different rank structures than germany, there not called field marshalls.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: June 03, 2010, 09:45:02 PM »

I'd love to see him run with Joseph McCarthy.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: June 04, 2010, 01:54:15 PM »

The point im making is we have different rank structures than germany, there not called field marshalls.

And as I pointed out, the Philippine Army does have the rank of Field Marshall, which MacArthur held from August 24, 1936. On July 26, 1941, when FDR federalized the Philippine Army, he also recalled MacArthur to active duty in the U.S. Army at his U.S. retired rank of Major General.  However, MacArthur continued to wear what he called his "Philippine field marshal's cap" which added some extra gold trim above the visor to a regulation U.S. Army general's cap until Truman fired him.

It's bad enough you didn't bother check the facts the first time in order to make your snide comment, but you didn't bother to take note of why your comment was incorrect after it had been pointed out.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: June 18, 2010, 04:22:22 PM »

Of course not. We have Truman to thank for the fact that we still have North Korea.

We rather have to thank Truman there weren't nuclear war.

Actually, it was Eisenhower's threat of using nuclear weapons that forced the armistice
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: June 19, 2010, 02:11:24 AM »

 I think it was just a bluff just like the threat in Vietnam, I actually believe the  only reason we used them in WW2 is we wanted to see what they would do.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.