Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:41:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: .
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited?  (Read 1972 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


« on: May 10, 2010, 10:10:43 AM »

I'd impose a single term limit of 18 years.  The terms would be staggered in such a way that each seat becomes vacant every two years.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2010, 10:30:23 AM »

I'd impose a single term limit of 18 years.  The terms would be staggered in such a way that each seat becomes vacant every two years.

There'd still be additional unplanned vacancies, of course.

... with special nominations and confirmations to fill them accordingly.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,082
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2010, 12:44:09 PM »

Why are people acting as if 9 justices is some sort of divinely mandated number in coming up with term length proposals?  It's not even Constitutionally mandated.

I know, but 9 is fine by me.  An odd number of justices is preferable for obvious reasons, and 9 is neither too many nor too few.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.