Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:00:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: .
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Should Supreme Court justices have their terms limited?  (Read 2001 times)
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


« on: May 09, 2010, 06:42:53 PM »
they already are limited through the concept of death. The only foreseeable problem with this though is the obvious potential future where everything is like ghost in the shell, and supreme court justices could rely on cyber brains to live for almost 200 years.
Logged
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2010, 10:03:37 AM »
The advent of cybernetic neural implants could potentially mean that they could be on the bench for eternity.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.