Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 04:13:59 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
International Elections
(Moderator:
Sibboleth
)
Let the great boundary rejig commence
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
31
32
33
34
35
[
36
]
37
38
39
40
41
Author
Topic: Let the great boundary rejig commence (Read 47457 times)
FreedomFighter
Rookie
Posts: 20
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #875 on:
July 04, 2012, 01:03:54 pm »
Quote from: Comrade Sibboleth on July 04, 2012, 01:01:50 pm
Quote from: stepney on July 04, 2012, 12:29:58 pm
The only arguments against seemed to be sentimentality; a misguided belief that other, divisive, cultures should be fostered and nurtured; and Welsh nationalism.
To which it could be claimed that the only arguments in favour of your position are consistent only with being a bigoted cretin.
Or the abuse and the arrogance could be dropped and things could be looked at more
reasonably
. In which case it would seem obvious that attempts to accommodate the Welsh language (so to speak) are
quite
reasonable. Bilingualism is the order of the day anyway; there are no monoglot communities left now and no prospect of bringing them back. So why get angry?
Quote
If you would like to dispute that the lingua franca of Wales south of, say, Aberystwyth and Montgomery, is English, and that most people south of that line barely speak Welsh, I'd like to hear the argument. If it's that we should artificially foster such a half-dead tongue as Welsh through the nomenclature of seats in the House of Commons, there is a case against it that is almost unanswerable.
A majority of people in Carmarthenshire claim to be able to speak Welsh to some level. There are actually only a handful of wards in the county there were a majority don't understand the language at all, and the only one where it's a
large
majority is Laugharne (which is south of the Landsker). Parts of Carmarthenshire - the Amman Valley especially - are almost as Welsh speaking as Arfon.
And, of course, most people in Wales who don't speak the language have no problems with Welsh place names.
He's just an idiot, ignore him.
Logged
stepney
Jr. Member
Posts: 77
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #876 on:
July 06, 2012, 07:02:03 am »
Quote from: Comrade Sibboleth on July 04, 2012, 01:01:50 pm
Quote from: stepney on July 04, 2012, 12:29:58 pm
The only arguments against seemed to be sentimentality; a misguided belief that other, divisive, cultures should be fostered and nurtured; and Welsh nationalism.
To which it could be claimed that the only arguments in favour of your position are consistent only with being a bigoted cretin.
Or the abuse and the arrogance could be dropped and things could be looked at more
reasonably
. In which case it would seem obvious that attempts to accommodate the Welsh language (so to speak) are
quite
reasonable. Bilingualism is the order of the day anyway; there are no monoglot communities left now and no prospect of bringing them back. So why get angry?
Yes, yes. Perhaps only a socialist isolated from realism could in one paragraph accuses his interlocutor of being a 'bigoted cretin' (with a friend below to call me an 'idiot') and then in the next breath make an accusation against the same person of 'abusive arrogance'.
The point I have made here, and in another place where doktorb, you and I are all members, is that Welsh, were it not for public subsidy, would die. And that as such, I believe, public subsidy should be withdrawn and that it should die its natural death. Multiculturalism and polyglotism may be prayed in Welsh's aid, but you forget that I live in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, where multiculturalism is a canard, a cover word for divisiveness and the religious and ethnic supremacism of a minority group.
I would like the Bangladeshis of the East End to jump into the melting pot with the rest of us; why should I not apply that to the Welsh without being accused of bigotry?
Bringing this subject back to the topic at hand, the seat based on Carmarthen has been called Carmarthen (or Carmarthen Boroughs, or West Carmarthenshire) since Wales got Parliamentary representation - for any passing Americans on this thread that's twice as long as they've been a nation. Why, now, should that be changed? Why should a public body be entrenching and furthering the divisiveness of a non-English tongue when it should be supporting integration? To bring the subject home to me, it is as if, after roughly 130 years of seats in northern Tower Hamlets named after the local communities, the English Commission should elect to rename Bethnal Green and Bow 'Banglatown' for no good reason but to 'recognise' or 'celebrate' diversity or some such.
Are you capable of seeing my point, or is it that all Tories are arrogant bigots and cretins and idiots in your eyes, or what?
Quote from: Comrade Sibboleth on July 04, 2012, 01:01:50 pm
And, of course, most people in Wales who don't speak the language have no problems with Welsh place names.
Whereas all the people in Wales speak English and none of them have any problem with English place names, particularly the ones that have been established for half a milennium.
Logged
"I wonder if any of those who furnished him a platform will now have the grace to admit that they were hosting a man who is not just a pimp for fascism but one of its prostitutes as well."
"It's quarter-past ooh, I must get a little hand put on this watch."
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #877 on:
July 06, 2012, 09:46:20 am »
Quote from: stepney on July 06, 2012, 07:02:03 am
Quote from: Comrade Sibboleth on July 04, 2012, 01:01:50 pm
Quote from: stepney on July 04, 2012, 12:29:58 pm
The only arguments against seemed to be sentimentality; a misguided belief that other, divisive, cultures should be fostered and nurtured; and Welsh nationalism.
To which it could be claimed that the only arguments in favour of your position are consistent only with being a bigoted cretin.
Or the abuse and the arrogance could be dropped and things could be looked at more
reasonably
. In which case it would seem obvious that attempts to accommodate the Welsh language (so to speak) are
quite
reasonable. Bilingualism is the order of the day anyway; there are no monoglot communities left now and no prospect of bringing them back. So why get angry?
Yes, yes. Perhaps only a socialist isolated from realism could in one paragraph accuses his interlocutor of being a 'bigoted cretin' (with a friend below to call me an 'idiot') and then in the next breath make an accusation against the same person of 'abusive arrogance'.
FreedomFighter is just an idiot (or more likely, just a troll), ignore him. You also maybe ought to go read that sentence with "abusive arrogance" in it again, you seem to have misunderstood it.
Along with the terms "multiculturalism" and "integration", of course. Oh well.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #878 on:
July 06, 2012, 11:31:25 am »
Quote from: stepney on July 06, 2012, 07:02:03 am
Bringing this subject back to the topic at hand, the seat based on Carmarthen has been called Carmarthen (or Carmarthen Boroughs, or West Carmarthenshire) since Wales got Parliamentary representation - for any passing Americans on this thread that's twice as long as they've been a nation.
If we're going to start on the antiquity line, Welsh was in use in Caerfyrddin/Carmarthen long before the Anglo-Saxons learned the skill of long-distance sailing and left the bogs of northern Germany and Jutland for greener pastures. Get over it.
«
Last Edit: July 06, 2012, 11:43:34 am by ObserverIE
»
Logged
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #879 on:
July 06, 2012, 11:36:16 am »
Quote from: stepney on July 06, 2012, 07:02:03 am
Are you capable of seeing my point, or is it that all Tories are arrogant bigots and cretins and idiots in your eyes, or what?
"All"? No.
At least one? Definitely.
Logged
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #880 on:
July 06, 2012, 06:01:59 pm »
My dear Stepney
The point you made comparing the changes with TH and Wales is very well made (and I genuinely mean that!). I am not going to pick holes, there's a fair amount of chin-stroke content you've provided
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #881 on:
July 07, 2012, 04:04:40 am »
There is no logic at all in demanding immigrants to Tower Hamlets learn English but the natives of Britain learn the language of the English immigrants.
Oh wait. A Tory in Stepney. Odds are he arrived long after the Bangladeshis. And suddenly it all made sense. (Also, the renaming would have to be Bethnal Green aur Bow to be at all parallel. Well "aur" is Hindi/Urdu, not Bangla... from some wikiing it *seems* Bangla would be "eor".)
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Bro-mentum
tomm_86
YaBB God
Posts: 1148
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #882 on:
July 12, 2012, 08:55:22 am »
'Isolated from realism'
Lol, I like this phrase. I'm going to use it put down people who are lack interest in the works of Gustave Courbet more often..
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #883 on:
July 12, 2012, 09:49:56 am »
Who was, of course, persecuted for his politics.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8981
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #884 on:
July 12, 2012, 11:47:38 pm »
Quote from: stepney on July 04, 2012, 12:29:58 pm
Quote from: doktorb on July 03, 2012, 04:33:43 am
Stepney, that rant was almost Daily Mail esque! I ticked off the bingo card at least six old favourites....
My dear Doktorb, the fact that it is "almost Daily Mail esque", as George Orwell almost said, doesn't mean it's wrong. My own opinions on Welsh were expressed on another place a while back. The only arguments against seemed to be sentimentality; a misguided belief that other, divisive, cultures should be fostered and nurtured; and Welsh nationalism.
If you would like to dispute that the lingua franca of Wales south of, say, Aberystwyth and Montgomery, is English, and that most people south of that line barely speak Welsh, I'd like to hear the argument. If it's that we should artificially foster such a half-dead tongue as Welsh through the nomenclature of seats in the House of Commons, there is a case against it that is almost unanswerable.
Linguistic diversity, like many if not most types of diversity, is an intrinsic and positive good.
Logged
Quote from: Averroės Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Χahar
Xahar
YaBB God
Posts: 36855
Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.26
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #885 on:
July 13, 2012, 12:19:27 am »
As a Bangladeshi, I feel like I should be offended by this.
Logged
Hashemite
YaBB God
Posts: 30162
Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -7.30
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #886 on:
July 13, 2012, 05:25:37 am »
I didn't read this thread, but I read stepney's rant, and as a Breton, I feel directly offended and naturally disgusted. But, of course, being French and all, I'm quite used to this kind of rhetoric in favour of homogeneity and centralism.
Logged
Quote
20:12 oakvale Taylor Swift's 22 was originally titled 75 in reference to her ex Flanby's proposed tax rate
Quote
20:49 Snowstalker yes, but i'm the kind of fascist who would have backed the allies
20:57 Snowstalker sadly, it's a legitimate ideology tarnished by the incompetent mussolini and the vile hitler
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #887 on:
July 13, 2012, 09:34:34 am »
Quote from: Χahar on July 13, 2012, 12:19:27 am
As a Bangladeshi, I feel like I should be offended by this.
So what is Bangla for "Bethnal Green and Bow"?
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Χahar
Xahar
YaBB God
Posts: 36855
Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.26
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #888 on:
July 13, 2012, 02:16:27 pm »
"Bethnal" appears to derive from "blithe hall", so...I would have to think about it.
Logged
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #889 on:
July 13, 2012, 05:54:53 pm »
Quote from: Χahar on July 13, 2012, 02:16:27 pm
"Bethnal" appears to derive from "blithe hall", so...I would have to think about it.
Oh, I wouldn't bother with an etymological approach. It doesn't demonstrate the proper spirit of the British empire.
Just transliterate the English pronunciation (or something approximating it) into Bengali and then transliterate it back again. Better still, choose Bengali words which sound similar even if the meaning is completely different. There are plenty of
Leamhchoill
s (elm wood) in Ireland which got "translated" to Longfield, or
Fuarchoill
s (cold wood) which got transformed into Forkhill or Forthill.
Logged
Χahar
Xahar
YaBB God
Posts: 36855
Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.26
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #890 on:
July 14, 2012, 02:07:48 am »
My own last name has a dozen different spellings, and the one that I happen to have inherited isn't remotely intuitive. I certainly don't blame everyone for spelling it wrong. Thanks, Empire!
Logged
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #891 on:
July 15, 2012, 04:47:37 am »
The Bengali language Wikipedia tells me "বেথনাল গ্রিন" which Google Translate tells me is "Bēthanāla grina"
There is no Bengali language Wiki page for "Bow".
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #892 on:
July 15, 2012, 04:49:27 am »
Ditto "টাওয়ার হ্যামলেট্স" / "Ṭā'ōẏāra hyāmalēṭsa"
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #893 on:
July 24, 2012, 02:40:24 pm »
The Boundary Commission for Scotland will reveal its revised recommendations in September
The ditto ditto for England will ditto ditto in October.
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
Gary J
Jr. Member
Posts: 58
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #894 on:
August 06, 2012, 04:31:26 pm »
There has been a major development in British politics today, even though it does not seem to have been generally recognised yet, which may prevent the current boundary reviews taking effect for the 2015 general election.
Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, has announced that House of Lords reform is being dropped due to backbench Conservative opposition (and Labour opportunism). He regards this as a breach of the coalition agreement and will ask Liberal Democrat MPs (including Ministers) to vote against the draft Orders in Council, which need to be passed to give legal effect to the boundary reviews when finalised by the boundary commissions.
Without Liberal Democrat support there will not be a Commons majority for the boundary changes, so the next general election will have to be contested for the existing 650 seats and not the re-drawn 600.
The boundary commissions will continue with the review. They are due to report by October 2013. The vote in Parliament is likely to be in late 2013 or early 2014.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
Posts: 8033
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #895 on:
August 06, 2012, 04:34:24 pm »
60 pages of pointlessness now really.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
Posts: 1606
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #896 on:
August 06, 2012, 04:53:00 pm »
...and yet it feels so good!
Actually, they're not dead and buried until the vote on them is defeated.
Logged
E: -8.26 S: -3.3
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #897 on:
August 06, 2012, 05:29:14 pm »
I'm fairly deflated about this
House of Lords reform can wait. The boundary changes can't. Clegg's stance is disappointing.
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
Gary J
Jr. Member
Posts: 58
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #898 on:
August 06, 2012, 05:31:32 pm »
The information I have seen, is that the Boundary Commission for England will ignore the political activity and will continue with the review.
The four national commissions are obliged to carry out reviews, as required by law. What the government and Parliament does with the eventual reports, is not a matter for the commissions.
The present political crisis may be compromised, before the parliamentary vote needs to be taken. I agree the review is not definitively dead unless and until the changes are voted down.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
Posts: 8033
Re: Let the great boundary rejig commence
«
Reply #899 on:
August 06, 2012, 05:36:19 pm »
Quote from: doktorb on August 06, 2012, 05:29:14 pm
I'm fairly deflated about this
House of Lords reform can wait. The boundary changes can't. Clegg's stance is disappointing.
To be fair, the proposed boundaries were dire and the Lords plans were dire. Win-win. Although, I would've voted yes in any referendum on the Lords stuff.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
31
32
33
34
35
[
36
]
37
38
39
40
41
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...