Republicans are giddy that they failed to capture OBL

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/247753p-212149c.html

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

fern that is by far the stupidest heading for a thread that I have ever seen.  You and any DEMOcrapweasel spinmasters who really believe that are asses of the dumbest kind.  The bastards killed over 3,000 before and nobody takes any glee in that.  Oh but Kerry says it is a nuisance.  A NUISANCE.

You too are a nuisance.

They seem pretty happy about the latest OBL tape.

Kerry said he'd reduce the terrorism problem to that of a nuisance. Obviously having almost 3000 people killed in one of Al Gore's best counties is more than a nuisance.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

ALERT!!!!!!!!  FERN has been promoted to the MOST UNFREAKINBELIEVABLE CRAPWEASEL of this board.  He is all but trying to intimate that UBL targeted a strong Gore county in the 911 attacks.

Yeah, you're right, Bush really won Manhattan in 2000.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I noticed jFRAUD didn't answer my question; I'm not too suprised at that.  I'll ask it again.

I'm quite curious jFRAUD, to the level that of "nuisance" Kerry thinks it is.  Would he put security ahead of other things?

It's a lot more than a nuisance now.
Yawn, are you going to misquote Kerry on his global test comment, now too? Next time read carefully what he said.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

fern, kerry would sell out our sovereignty in a new york minute if he thought it would win him UN brownie points.

He needs a Global Rectal Exam.

Kerry will never allow any other country (or the UN) a veto over our security.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The global test comment in full:

"But if and when you do it, Jim, you have to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons."

You left out what he said right before:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I noticed jFRAUD didn't answer my question; I'm not too suprised at that.  I'll ask it again.

I'm quite curious jFRAUD, to the level that of "nuisance" Kerry thinks it is.  Would he put security ahead of other things?

It's a lot more than a nuisance now.
Yawn, are you going to misquote Kerry on his global test comment, now too? Next time read carefully what he said.

Okay, jFRAUD so you're sure John Kerry isn't a "nuisance" and that he consider's it of very high priority, is that correct?  This is a serious question.  What priority does he put on it?

I can tell from your yawning and from your posts that you are having a problem with oxygen supply to the brain, but try to answer it jFRAUD.

It's really time to start ignoring you.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

fern, kerry would sell out our sovereignty in a new york minute if he thought it would win him UN brownie points.

He needs a Global Rectal Exam.

Kerry will never allow any other country (or the UN) a veto over our security.

Well I guess he'd have to decide he wanted to defend it in the first place. He votes against the '91 Gulf War, he votes to cancel most of weapons systems Reagan gave the military money to design, and he has consistently demanded Intel budget cuts. What really makes you think he would be so great to wage a war against terrorism?

How would StarWars have helped us against 9/11, anyways?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I noticed jFRAUD still hasn't been able to answer my question.  I'll have to ask it again.

Are  you so sure that  John Kerry does not think terorism is a "nuisance" and that he considers it of very high priority?  This is a serious question.  What priority does he put on it?

A higher a priority than you've put to being anooying, and that's saying a lot.