A Lanslide Map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:33:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  A Lanslide Map
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is more likely
#1
First Map
 
#2
Second Map
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: A Lanslide Map  (Read 2232 times)
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,149
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 25, 2010, 07:33:56 AM »

I realize that these are both unlikely, but I thought that I would show what the next big landslide might look like.

Post your own landslide scenarios



Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2010, 03:38:51 PM »

How could anyone think the first map was more likely?
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2010, 04:09:23 PM »

How could anyone think the first map was more likely?

And the second for that matter.
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2010, 04:26:14 PM »

How could anyone think the first map was more likely?

What's made you so pessimistic Opedo?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2010, 04:27:11 PM »

The second one, easily. Obama's approvals would only need to sag 5-10 more points for it to happen. On the first map, his approval would need to be around 60%, which is a lot farther away.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2010, 10:05:02 PM »

The second map has more recent historical precedent so I think its much more likely.  The Republicans would have to nominate someone even worse than Palin for the first map to have any chance of happening.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2010, 12:52:43 AM »

1st map
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,097
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2010, 01:06:43 AM »

2nd map, and the only one who has even a chance at that is Mitch Daniels.

1st map could be done - but not by Obama.  Clinton could have pulled that.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2010, 01:08:00 AM »

The 2nd, although it's hard to decide between the 2, since neither will be close to what actually happens.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,136
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2010, 02:28:35 AM »
« Edited: May 26, 2010, 02:31:18 AM by DS0816 »

ELECTION 2012



Republican Landslide
GOP challenger shifts the popular vote 27.26% to win by 20 points.






Democratic Landslide
Democratic incumbent gets poor Republican challenger; country delivers massive landslide.
Beginning with previous election’s 7.26% popular-vote margin,
incumbent shifts popular vote 20% to win by 27.26 points.


Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2010, 02:39:27 AM »

GAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2010, 03:15:58 AM »


     I know, the media-endorsed colors burn. Sad
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2010, 06:16:38 AM »



Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2010, 10:12:51 AM »
« Edited: May 26, 2010, 10:27:28 AM by pbrower2a »

Obama landslide, as it looks on Thursday following Election Day:



deep red                  Obama 10% margin or greater  290
medium red              Obama, 5-9.9% margin  88
pale red                   Obama, margin under 5% 107
white                        too close to call  6
pale blue                  Republican  under 5%  14
medium blue             Republican  5-9.9% margin  22
deep blue                 Republican over 10% 4


Mississippi is still up for grabs. President Obama's barest win is Tennessee and his barest loss is Louisiana.  President Obama had maxed out in much of America in 2008 and held on there; he gained enough in Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Virginia to go over 55% in each state. His gains are largely in places that he lost badly in 2008, where he picked up most of the voters that used to go reliably to southern moderates like Carter and Clinton. Kansas and Nebraska have shown that given a choice between a sane liberal and a right-wing nut, they go for the sane liberal as in 1964. Big GOP margins in some Western states have been severely eroded.

Obama had to win Florida by about 8% to have a shot at winning Texas because Texas is best described politically as Oklahoma grafted onto Florida. Obama lost Oklahoma, but he did win Florida by about 8%.

Utah is not an oversight; the GOP nominee was callow enough to say stupid things about the LDS Church, and Mormons have shown the Republican nominee the consequences of a "macaca" moment, which says much about the GOP nominee.  That's only one state, but it is a big lesson.

This is a coast-to-coast, border-to-Gulf, border-to-border disaster for the GOP.

I concur with this one as an Obama loss in a landslide:



with the caveat that whether Obama wins or loses Michigan depends upon the African-American turnout. The Twin Cities and Milwaukee just don't have the black population that Greater Detroit has. Maine splits its electoral votes this time. Ignore the intensity of colors and the EV counts here.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,136
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2010, 03:32:09 PM »
« Edited: May 26, 2010, 03:42:14 PM by DS0816 »

pbrower2a,

In your Democratic Landslide scenario, you have Utah carrying over 10 points for a re-elected Barack Obama. I'm thinking you meant to indicate that Utah's margins would come down to the 10-point-plus range for the 2012 Republican challenger. (Not that this thread is about 2012.)

(In 2008, John McCain carried heavily-Republican Utah by 28 points, down 40% from the 45-point margin carried in 2004 by George W. Bush.)

Note on Mississippi: John McCain carried it in 2008 by 13 points, and won neighboring Alabama by 21 points. With 1960 an interesting twist (Harry Byrd), these two haven't disagreed on a presidential candidate since 1840.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2010, 06:00:28 PM »

     Obama does better in Oklahoma, Utah, & Wyoming in a landslide loss than he does in Washington, Oregon, & New Hampshire? I think not.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2010, 06:05:25 PM »

I don't think there's a Republican who could win a landslide like map #2, but, that said, map #1 only happens if the Republicans nominated Rand Paul (lol) or someone like that.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2010, 07:51:58 PM »

Here's my guess...

Republican Landslide:


Democratic Landslide:
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2010, 08:30:35 PM »

pbrower2a,

In your Democratic Landslide scenario, you have Utah carrying over 10 points for a re-elected Barack Obama. I'm thinking you meant to indicate that Utah's margins would come down to the 10-point-plus range for the 2012 Republican challenger. (Not that this thread is about 2012.)

(In 2008, John McCain carried heavily-Republican Utah by 28 points, down 40% from the 45-point margin carried in 2004 by George W. Bush.)

Note on Mississippi: John McCain carried it in 2008 by 13 points, and won neighboring Alabama by 21 points. With 1960 an interesting twist (Harry Byrd), these two haven't disagreed on a presidential candidate since 1840.

The landslide scenario that I show for President Obama is so unlikely that I have to figure that the GOP nominee is crass or callow enough to offend LDS sensibilities by denouncing Mormons as "not real Christians". That is much more than a "macaca moment"; that's a bungled campaign of the worst kind. For President Obama to win such a landslide he will have to face an incredibly-weak opponent under unusually-favorable circumstances for himself. President Obama has proved without question that he is an extremely adept campaigner capable of exploiting any weakness of an opponent while playing by Queensbury rules. I just can't imagine President Obama facing someone as incompetent as would be necessary for my landslide scenario.

The landslide scenario the other way suggests that things have generally gone badly. 

The strongest victory that I can imagine for President Obama is roughly an Eisenhower-scale win. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.078 seconds with 14 queries.