If Alvin Greene makes it to November over/under
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:22:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  If Alvin Greene makes it to November over/under
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: If Alvin Greene makes it to November over/under  (Read 3211 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2010, 11:00:17 PM »

Over.

He will get over 50%
Mark my GOSHDARNED WORDS.

Come January we will be saying hello to South Carolina Senator Alvin Greene, you middle class honkies.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 14, 2010, 11:04:14 PM »


Say it ain't so. Sad
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 14, 2010, 11:08:53 PM »

Over.

He will get over 50%
Mark my GOSHDARNED WORDS.

Come January we will be saying hello to South Carolina Senator Alvin Greene, you middle class honkies.

He'd increase the overall IQ of the Senate.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2010, 02:27:51 AM »

With that being said if f a halfway competent third party candidate is on the ticket I could see Greene not getting out of the 20's.
There is a Green Party candidate.

Rawl had been nominated as the Working Family Party convention.  SC permits fusion, but also has a law that says that if a candidate loses one nomination, he loses them all.  So Rawl can't run as the Working Family party candidate.

In 2008, Eugene Platt filed to run in the Democratic primary for a state legislative seat.  He then won the Working Family and Green Party nomination (by convention), and later lost the Democratic Primary.

The Democratic Party sued to knock him off the general election ballot and the case is still under litigation.  It was a close enough seat that a Green candidate could have flipped the race to the Republicans.

Some have suggested that if someone were going to "plant" a candidate wouldn't it be appropriate to choose some named "Greene".  But if the Green Party wanted to tweak the Democrats, wouldn't they choose someone named "Greene" as well, and then massively vote in the Democratic primary?

Another possible source is Brian Ryan Doyle who was a candidate for Congress in the 3rd district.  Earlier this year he sued the Democratic Party to get on the ballot.  The party later backed off, but refused to put his picture on the web site.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Doyle is black and a radio talk show host who has had a number of legal and financial battles.

He is now calling for the chair of the SC Democratic party to resign because of her failure to get behind the party's senatorial candidate.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2010, 02:31:56 AM »

South Carolina, as a whole, is less than %30 black, that's before we even begin looking at voter registration. 
Blacks in the South generally have as high or higher voter registration rates than whites.  It is the depraved north where there is a big differential.  I think Minnesota had a 20% differential in 2008 between whites and blacks.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 12 queries.