6/8 Primaries - AR, CA, IA, ME, MT, NV, NJ, ND, SC, SD, VA (results links in OP)

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Inglis is getting destroyed. I'll be sorry to see him go.

[War on Want]

The thing to remember in AR is that Halter gained over the course of the reporting in almost every county, so using anything other than fully reported counties as a baseline might be dangerious. For evidence, see Jefferson, which he trailed in by nearly 30 points with early votes in, but has improved to only trailing by 17. That said it looks bad.

I'm kind of confused by that. Wouldn't Black precincts, strong Lincoln areas, usually report later?

[President Mitt]

Inglis is getting destroyed. I'll be sorry to see him go.

This night is going pretty rotten.

[Lunar]

I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but Hurt is clearly going to be the nominee against our progressive friend Tom in VA, by a very strong margin too, leading everyone else combined, essentially, despite being a "tax-increaser"

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

AP's called that Scott has made the runoff in SC-1, but not who his opponent will be.  Thurmond has second for now, but Campbell has done better in the counties that haven't fully reported yet.

[JohnnyLongtorso]

If these numbers are right, Diane Gooch is probably not going to win in NJ-06. about 1/4 of the precincts are in for Middlesex and she's barely winning there.

[War on Want]

I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but Hurt is clearly going to be the nominee against our progressive friend Tom in VA, by a very strong margin too, leading everyone else combined, essentially, despite being a "tax-increaser"

I expected that but still:

It's too bad that there were so many teabagger candidates.

[Lunar]

I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but Hurt is clearly going to be the nominee against our progressive friend Tom in VA, by a very strong margin too, leading everyone else combined, essentially, despite being a "tax-increaser"

I expected that but still:

It's too bad that there were so many teabagger candidates.

I expected him to win, just not by 48%ish, more like in the 30s, I mean he was the object of scorn by all the teaparties for raising taxes and faced like five challengers, that he would win the plurality was pretty obvious, but so decisively? 

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

HAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

http://www.wciv.com/news/stories/0610/744075.html

The SC Democrats just nominated an unemployed military vet who had no signs, no money and no website, and hadn't been seen since he filed.

[Sam Spade]

The thing to remember in AR is that Halter gained over the course of the reporting in almost every county, so using anything other than fully reported counties as a baseline might be dangerious. For evidence, see Jefferson, which he trailed in by nearly 30 points with early votes in, but has improved to only trailing by 17. That said it looks bad.

I'm kind of confused by that. Wouldn't Black precincts, strong Lincoln areas, usually report later?

You never necessarily know what's going to report when in these areas.  I'm getting Dan's point though (should have followed the AR results more closely last time).  Point being, most of Pulaski is still out and that's a problem given the breakdown so far.  Even in Washington though, Lincoln only won by 8 last time and is now winning by 18.  Considering that the other counties look close to break-even to me, it is not encouraging for Halter supporters.

[Eraserhead]

Hmm... Halter keeps gaining...

[cinyc]

Inglis is getting destroyed. I'll be sorry to see him go.

I won't be.  He voted to ban Internet gambling, sided with the Democrats against Iraq, and has increasingly taken on a pro-"climate change"stance - no thanks!  Let someone who actually represents Upstate South Carolina values represent Upstate South Carolina.

[JohnnyLongtorso]

Causey, Wills, and Bledsoe leading the AR House runoffs, all with 52-53%.

[ajc0918]

HAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

http://www.wciv.com/news/stories/0610/744075.html

The SC Democrats just nominated an unemployed military vet who had no signs, no money and no website, and hadn't been seen since he filed.

BAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA. PATHETIC.
He doesn't even have a website! WTF?

[Lunar]

HAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

http://www.wciv.com/news/stories/0610/744075.html

The SC Democrats just nominated an unemployed military vet who had no signs, no money and no website, and hadn't been seen since he filed.

Dawg, you're going to regret laughing if the California GOP nominated Orly Taitz, which is a SERIOUS possibility.

[xavier110]

LOL if Halter vs. Lincoln ends up 50/50.

[Eraserhead]

HAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

http://www.wciv.com/news/stories/0610/744075.html

The SC Democrats just nominated an unemployed military vet who had no signs, no money and no website, and hadn't been seen since he filed.

BAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA. PATHETIC.
He doesn't even have a website! WTF?

How is that Hatorade tasting?

[War on Want]

I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but Hurt is clearly going to be the nominee against our progressive friend Tom in VA, by a very strong margin too, leading everyone else combined, essentially, despite being a "tax-increaser"

I expected that but still:

It's too bad that there were so many teabagger candidates.

I expected him to win, just not by 48%ish, more like in the 30s, I mean he was the object of scorn by all the teaparties for raising taxes and faced like five challengers, that he would win the plurality was pretty obvious, but so decisively?  

He got 48 percent!? I only heard he won through this thread. I had no idea that it was such of a pwnage.

[Dan the Roman]

The thing to remember in AR is that Halter gained over the course of the reporting in almost every county, so using anything other than fully reported counties as a baseline might be dangerious. For evidence, see Jefferson, which he trailed in by nearly 30 points with early votes in, but has improved to only trailing by 17. That said it looks bad.

I'm kind of confused by that. Wouldn't Black precincts, strong Lincoln areas, usually report later?

You never necessarily know what's going to report when in these areas.  I'm getting Dan's point though (should have followed the AR results more closely last time).  Point being, most of Pulaski is still out and that's a problem given the breakdown so far.  Even in Washington though, Lincoln only won by 8 last time and is now winning by 18.  Considering that the other counties look close to break-even to me, it is not encouraging for Halter supporters.

I think your right. My observations were in fact based on the AR-2 runoff results, which is a black v. white race, and I was assuming Elliot's strong showing indicated the black areas being in.

[Tender Branson]

Good morning, what did I miss ?

Can anyone give a short summary ?

[ajc0918]

HAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

http://www.wciv.com/news/stories/0610/744075.html

The SC Democrats just nominated an unemployed military vet who had no signs, no money and no website, and hadn't been seen since he filed.

BAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA. PATHETIC.
He doesn't even have a website! WTF?

How is that Hatorade tasting?

Delicious. I think I'm going to go donate to  Alvin Greene.
Oh wait, I can't....
HAHAHAAA.

[Sam Spade]

Halter got some very strong showings in from Little River and Miller, two counties around Texarkana which were his strongest counties in the primary too.  Just fyi.

[Eraserhead]

Halter got some very strong showings in from Little River and Miller, two counties around Texarkana which were his strongest counties in the primary too.  Just fyi.

I don't think this puppy is over with just yet.

[Progressive]

I'm really confused, why are all of the sites showing different GOP candidates for the Sen primary in Nevada???

[cinyc]

AP hasn't called it yet, but I'm pretty sure Noem will win in South Dakota.  What's out seems to be largely Pennington County (Rapid City) and various small counties largely on Indian reservations.  So far, Noem is winning Pennington and surrounding counties and there aren't many Republicans on the reservations.  Noem should hold on.