New Hampshire (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:18:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  New Hampshire (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New Hampshire  (Read 19850 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« on: December 01, 2003, 10:51:01 AM »

...But Wyoming has a Democrat governor(!)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2003, 03:24:27 PM »

I think presidential elections are a better way to judge the voting inclinations of states!

I think elections for Congress (especially the House) are a better way to gauge the political climate of a particular era than elections for President are. America was far far ***FAR*** more conservative under Clinton than under Reagan.

Agreed
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2003, 04:27:28 AM »

And immigration of course.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2003, 09:21:33 AM »

What you have to remember is that the US (like the UK) have a political system where you vote for candidates, not parties. Because of this things can get turned upside down rather easily due to personal charisma/unpopularity, etc. This is very clear in the US where someone like Reagan could win everywhere except extreme conservatism simply because voters supported him as president. This is why congressional elections really gives a better picture, since you get rid of some of the personal dynamics ruling presdential ones.

Got it in one.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2003, 03:10:53 PM »

If I remember correctly, the Swedish Social Democrat's have been the most electorally sucessful socialist party in the world.
Compare with the SPUSA...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2003, 10:47:34 AM »

Also, the two occasions on which no-socialist governements have been elected, 1976 and 1991, have seen the two deepest economical crises since the depression.  

Is this linked? Wink
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2003, 04:10:11 PM »

Sounds about right.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2003, 10:10:23 AM »

In VT Dean had a reputation as an expert "triangulator" with a fetish for balanced budgets.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2003, 04:52:00 AM »

Bernie is a very good constituancy rep and he usually gets about a quater of the normal GOP vote(!)
In Vermont people tend to "vote for the man, not for the party", something common in a lot of rural areas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.