How did the following past third party voters vote?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:43:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How did the following past third party voters vote?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did the following past third party voters vote?  (Read 2979 times)
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 08, 2011, 02:12:32 AM »

Break them down by Dem/GOP/Other. If Other is significant (e.g. a lot of Nader 2000 voters would have voted for him in 2008), break that down too.

Thurmond 1948
Wallace 1968
Anderson 1980
Perot 1992
Nader 2000
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2011, 09:21:58 AM »

thurmond - 95% GOP
wallace - 95% GOP
anderson - 70% Dem
Perot - 51% Dem
Nader 45% Other, 45% Dem
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2011, 09:42:36 AM »

I always thought that Reagan got to 59 percent was by gaining all the Anderson voters in his camp.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2011, 10:28:28 AM »

When I meant was e.g.

Thurmond:

McCain 95%
Obama 4%
Other 1%

Nader:

Obama: 45%
Nader: 30%
Other: 15%
McCain: 10%
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,081
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2011, 12:48:33 PM »

Thurmond 1948 : 90% rep
Wallace 1968 : 90% rep
Anderson 1980 : 70% dem
Perot 1992 : 60% rep
Nader 2000 : 70% dem
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2011, 01:48:38 PM »

Thurmond - insufficient sample
Wallace - GOP 50%, Dem 35%, Oth 15% (remember that Wallace's strength was among urban whites)
Anderson - Dem 50%, GOP 30%, Oth 20%
Perot - GOP 50%, Dem 40%, Oth 10%
Nader - Oth 50%, Dem 40%, GOP 10%
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2011, 03:53:40 PM »

Obama winning 4% of Thurmond voters is extremely generous.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2011, 08:45:05 PM »

Obama winning 4% of Thurmond voters is extremely generous.

Perhaps, but consider that since the voting age was 21 back then, so every living Thurmond voter in 2008 was at least 81. With such a small sample, and a potential for changing views from youth to old age, it's conceivable.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2011, 05:05:32 AM »

Robert Byrd problably voted Thurmon and Obama.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 15 queries.