On Israel, Congress Still Obedient

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

On Israel, Congress Still Obedient

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Obama's Israel Policy Showing No Difference With Clinton-Bush

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[The Ex-Factor]

Congress militantly pro-Israel and Obama with an equivocal, middling, and cautious policy on a contentious issue? Color me shocked. Bit disappointed to see Jesse Jackson Jr on that list of Democrats in the arms of the Jewish lobby, didn't he have some sort of trouble with Jews a while back?

[Umengus]

Congress is right: Israel must be supported in the fight against terrorism. God bless Israel.

[Zarn]

Disgusting.

[k-onmmunist]

Long live Israel.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Long live Israel.

Yeah, the U.S. exists to serve the interests of the state of I$rael, to hell with the American people.

[President Mitt]

At this point, it seems Israel annexing the United States is more likely than Israel becoming the "51st State."

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Congress militantly pro-Israel and Obama with an equivocal, middling, and cautious policy on a contentious issue?

I believe one of the points of the article was that, like Obama, Bush, Clinton, and Reagan all put on public shows of disagreement with 'Israel' while in substance remaining just as militantly committed to Zionism.

[??????????]

I agree, those jews sure are the evil sort. I certainly think we should come up with a final solution to the jewish question.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

I agree, those jews sure are the evil sort. I certainly think we should come up with a final solution to the jewish question.

Libertas, is that you?

[??????????]

[The Mikado]

I$rael

Welcome to "I'm not an anti-Semite, only an anti-Zionist!" with your host, The Mikado!  What do you have for us today, Mikado?

Thank you for the warm introduction.  Today, we're going to talk about things like "Zioni$m" and "I$rael."  These words have roots in anti-Semitic propaganda alleging conspiracies among Jewish moneylenders, and is usually used by the sort of people that believe theories about the de Rothschild family to indicate their belief that "Jew money" has unduly influenced political and social leaders.  These signs are typically associated with people that are not just anti-Zionist, but anti-Semitic!"

There you have it, folks!  See you next time on "I'm not an anti-Semite, only an anti-Zionist!"

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Oh, how quaint, look at the trolls try to derail this thread and spin the issue into something it's not. Predictable.

[??????????]

Oh, how quaint, look at the trolls try to derail this thread and spin the issue into something it's not. Predictable.

Under a govt lead by you should I invest money in Zyklon B stock?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

I agree, those jews sure are the evil sort. I certainly think we should come up with a final solution to the jewish question.

Under a govt lead by you should I invest money in Zyklon B stock?

Heard all this at your last Klan meeting?

[Sewer]

influenced political and social leaders

err...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee

[Free Palestine]

Look how fiscally conservative all these Republicans are.  They're so fiscally responsible, that they vote to spend $205 million on another country's missile defense program.

[??????????]

I agree, those jews sure are the evil sort. I certainly think we should come up with a final solution to the jewish question.

Under a govt lead by you should I invest money in Zyklon B stock?

Heard all this at your last Klan meeting?

That's basically the core of your beliefs, right?

[The Mikado]

Oh, how quaint, look at the trolls try to derail this thread and spin the issue into something it's not. Predictable.

Except how that's what it totally is?

PS: for disclosure, my post in the Post Moderation board after my earlier comment got reported:

Lunar, feel free to do whatever you need to do with that comment, but I stand by it.  Should an infraction be necessary, so be it.

[SvenssonRS]

Oh, how quaint, look at the trolls try to derail this thread and spin the issue into something it's not. Predictable.

I agree. This thread wasn't meant to be a means by which to prove you're an anti-Semite, because that's already been proven.

And for the record, I think all this Israel worship is utterly ridiculous. The country can fend for itself, and that's been proven. The members of congress who say these things are just tragically ignorant on foreign policy. That's all it is - dumbness.

[Lunar]

Okay, no  one is going to get infractions, but this thread is just going downhill and no good can come from it.

Please reread the rules.  Libertas, as you've basically reported all the posts in this thread that made snarks at you, while committing the same offense yourself, note that elaborate posts that construct a post are far less likely to count as infractions than "Stop trolling, you troll, you suck."  And no, I don't find "baiting" to be a convincing reason to give anyone an infraction even if you report three different posts with the same reason, especially when you take the bait.  And it's harder for me to take accusations of antisemitism as personal attacks when your retort is calling them a racist...

And States, you know this silliness ain't no good for my health.

If you want to try this thread again, be my guest, but my email inbox is going to get spammed with reports if I let this one continue.