Ron Paul vs. Woodrow Wilsom

[Psychic Octopus]

Who would win? By what margin? What does the map look like?


Paul/Paul

[CatoMinor]

Paul landslide every except  Massachusetts, they tend to dislike freedom there. And Wilson would narrowly carry D.C., where the (D) by his name outweighs his racism.

[Phony Moderate]

Massachusetts, they tend to dislike freedom there.

Which is why they voted for Reagan twice.

[President Mitt]

Massachusetts, they tend to dislike freedom there.

Not true.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Are we talking about the Wilson of 1912, of 1916, or of 1920 here?  I think Paul would beat the Wilson of 1916, but would lose to the Wilson of 1912 or of 1920.

[Bo]

Does Wilson flip-flop on his views on race?

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Pretend this is the Woodrow Wilson arriving home from Europe.

Then he'd win in a landslide.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Pretend this is the Woodrow Wilson arriving home from Europe.

Then he'd win in a landslide.

You'd vote for Wilson for sure, wouldn't you?

[Kaine for Senate '18]

You'd vote for Wilson for sure, wouldn't you?

Of course.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

You'd vote for Wilson for sure, wouldn't you?

Of course.

War, militarism, racism, bigotry, authoritarianism, censorship, political imprisonment, bankster empowerment; what's not to love about Wilson?

[Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey]

Pretend this is the Woodrow Wilson arriving home from Europe.

Then he'd win in a landslide.

Crap. Yeah, should have thought that through. I mean, he had bipartisan support from the LEP and everything when he returned home. Let's just say that this is the 1916 Wilson, then.

How about we do multiple scenarios? What would it look like with 1912 Wilson, 1916 Wilson, 1919 Wilson after Europe, and 1920 Wilson?

Ben, out of curiosity, why would you vote for Wilson?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

It doesn't matter what year we're talking about, Mr. "Birth of a Nation" isn't winning in a landslide in 2010 America.

[Bo]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

You would vote for Wilson? You know he and his Klansman friends didn't care much for ethnic minorities like Jews...?

[Bo]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

You would vote for Wilson? You know he and his Klansman friends didn't care much for ethnic minorities like Jews...?

Wilson appointed the first Jewish SC justice. That's something. He also had a lot of close Jewish friends, like Bernard Baruch. Paul's economic and foreign policy positions are more extreme, so I voted for Wilson. I think that if he tried to do anything racist or discriminatory, Congress would easily block him and maybe even impeach him.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

You would vote for Wilson? You know he and his Klansman friends didn't care much for ethnic minorities like Jews...?

Wilson appointed the first Jewish SC justice. That's something. He also had a lot of close Jewish friends, like Bernard Baruch. Paul's economic and foreign policy positions are more extreme, so I voted for Wilson. I think that if he tried to do anything racist or discriminatory, Congress would easily block him and maybe even impeach him.

Wilson liked bankers and mega-rich elites. Is that who you wish to be associated with?

[Psychic Octopus]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

His views are the same on race.

[Bo]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

You would vote for Wilson? You know he and his Klansman friends didn't care much for ethnic minorities like Jews...?

Wilson appointed the first Jewish SC justice. That's something. He also had a lot of close Jewish friends, like Bernard Baruch. Paul's economic and foreign policy positions are more extreme, so I voted for Wilson. I think that if he tried to do anything racist or discriminatory, Congress would easily block him and maybe even impeach him.

Wilson liked bankers and mega-rich elites. Is that who you wish to be associated with?

No. However, Wilson also broke a lot of trusts and banned child labor (which the SC overturned).

[Bo]

Since my question was left unanswered:

Wilson/Paul.

His views are the same on race.

Then I stand by my opinion that Paul would win.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Ben, out of curiosity, why would you vote for Wilson?

We're identical on economic and foreign policy views, he appointed progressives to the SCOTUS, and Paul is just terrible in every single way.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Ben, out of curiosity, why would you vote for Wilson?

We're identical on economic and foreign policy views, he appointed progressives to the SCOTUS, and Paul is just terrible in every single way.

In other words, you and Wilson both love death and destruction for the enrichment of the military-industrial complex.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Are we talking about the Wilson of 1912, of 1916, or of 1920 here?  I think Paul would beat the Wilson of 1916, but would lose to the Wilson of 1912 or of 1920.

^^^^