UK General Elections 1945-Present Survivor

[big bad fab]

No need to argue, Edu: it's always the same debate.

Those who vote for "ideas", "politically" and those who vote out of historical interest.
Partisan hacking is really boring after all those survivors...

The same with 2000 US presidential election ousted very early or even Cheney as VP (he was the most powerful, even if he was a b*st*rd).

Of course, 1979 should be eliminated in many, many rounds.

2001

(PS: the problem in this survivor will be more that the "manager" hasn't finished many of his survivors...)

[big bad fab]

LOL

I vote 2001 again.

And i still would like the reasoning for voting 1979, though i feel it will be what i expect

100% with Edu on this.

EDIT: that means I vote 2001

[big bad fab]

1955 or 1966 ?

Well, well, well...

1955

[big bad fab]

1955

[big bad fab]

After 1955, comes logically:

1966

[big bad fab]

2005

[big bad fab]

2005

[big bad fab]

2005

1970 and 1987 are next.

I agree !

[big bad fab]

No need to argue, Edu: it's always the same debate.

Those who vote for "ideas", "politically" and those who vote out of historical interest.
Partisan hacking is really boring after all those survivors...

2005

If there weren't so few choices left, I could use your vote as an example of what you are accusing others of doing. People always have different reasons for how they vote, you don't need to slam everyone as partisan hacks just because they vote a way you don't like.

1987

2005 is a boring election, without any surprise.
1987 would have come next in my vote. That's all.
(or will come next if it's still here)