General Senatorial Discussion

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

Btw, I ask the Vice President, until we chose new PPT, to open confirmation threads ASAP.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Why am I ranking higher than Rowan in seniority order?

Because you swore in first.


Of course both of your's are legally questionable, if at acceptable at all

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

In fact I would suggest you both redo them, properly.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

In fact I would suggest you both redo them, properly.

OK, re-done

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

In fact I would suggest you both redo them, properly.

OK, re-done

'

Great now no one can sue over your vote being invalid if a close vote comes down to you.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

In fact I would suggest you both redo them, properly.

OK, re-done

'

Great now no one can sue over your vote being invalid if a close vote comes down to you.

OK, can we expell Brandon now?

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

In fact I would suggest you both redo them, properly.

OK, re-done

'

Great now no one can sue over your vote being invalid if a close vote comes down to you.

OK, can we expell Brandon now?

Actaully, we can't expell anyone, or Jas will sue. Atleast until my OSPR amendment passes establishing procedures for that.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

New Order of Seniority
NC Yankee  2009
AHDuke99 2010
Bgwah  2010
HappyWarrior 2010
Antonio  2011
Kalwejt 2011
RowanBrandon 2011
Oakvale 2011
Snowguy715  2011
Shua  2011

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

The prick in charge of this place is making me redo my oath for no good reason:

Everything is for a reason.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Kalwejt, the below bill has serious flaws. The first of which is that it is title "Repeal of Privacy Protection Act" yet its text is repealing the repeal of the privacy protection act, in which case, such should be reflected in the title as "Repeal of the Repeal..." or something.

Secondly the bill establishes the precedent of the absence of a law existing as being in contradication, when this is not the case. The mere absence of a law doesn't create a contradiction. It just means there isn't a redundancy. Lastly, I don't think there is a requirement the Atlasian law provide enforcements that double on enforcement of Atlasian administrative police. Baiscally you are claiming that not only most Arizona pass its immigration law but that if it doesn't it is in violation of Federal law if the State doesn't actively and agressively enforce federal law. 

Repeal of Privacy Protection Act

Considering that a Repeal of Privacy Protection Act (F.L. 34-3) is contradicting the higher power of Dave and rules, set by him on the entire forum, said law is hereby repealed.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

Kalwejt, the below bill has serious flaws. The first of which is that it is title "Repeal of Privacy Protection Act" yet its text is repealing the repeal of the privacy protection act, in which case, such should be reflected in the title as "Repeal of the Repeal..." or something.

Secondly the bill establishes the precedent of the absence of a law existing as being in contradication, when this is not the case. The mere absence of a law doesn't create a contradiction. It just means there isn't a redundancy. Lastly, I don't think there is a requirement the Atlasian law provide enforcements that double on enforcement of Atlasian administrative police. Baiscally you are claiming that not only most Arizona pass its immigration law but that if it doesn't it is in violation of Federal law if the State doesn't actively and agressively enforce federal law. 

Repeal of Privacy Protection Act

Considering that a Repeal of Privacy Protection Act (F.L. 34-3) is contradicting the higher power of Dave and rules, set by him on the entire forum, said law is hereby repealed.

Hm, you got a point here, Yankee. Withdrew.

[shua]

We could still have such a bill  though, only it would not contain the language referring to a higher power.  Since the Repeal of the Privacy Protection Act creates the false impression that there is no problem with publishing PMs, I believe this would be a good idea.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

We could still have such a bill  though, only it would not contain the language referring to a higher power.  Since the Repeal of the Privacy Protection Act creates the false impression that there is no problem with publishing PMs, I believe this would be a good idea.

Why does the Atlasian law have double up on Forum administration. It exists over and above Atlasia and frankly takes the "Frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn" line when it comes to what the Atlasian government does. Hence why MasterJedi didn't and was right not to create a special exemption for Hammy and the boys as far as the NE assembly goes.

I will oppose any such attempt to restore the Privacy Protection Act. We have more to worry about then false impressions, and I think a better way can be found to combat such ignorance then restoring a flawed and potentially unconstitutional law.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I have instituted a new numbering system for amendments. Should I number all amendments regardless of what bill they are in order in which they are offered or should I start the numbering over for each bill.


Feline Protection Bill:
Senate Amendment 1
Senate Amendment 2

Do Not PM List Bill:
Senate Amendment 3

or


Feline Protection Bill:
Senate Amendment 1
Senate Amendment 2

Do Not PM List Bill:
Senate Amendment 1


The noticeboard currently reflects the first option while the Do Not PM list bill the second option. Which do you prefer? I like the first one the most.

[I left.]

The Privacy Protection Act was an awful thing. Don't bring it back.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

The Privacy Protection Act was an awful thing.

Elaborate.

[I left.]

The Privacy Protection Act was an awful thing.

Elaborate.

Blatantly unconstitutional and pointless.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

The Privacy Protection Act was an awful thing.

Elaborate.

Blatantly unconstitutional and pointless.

You know, when I have private conservation, I don't like when the jerk is then posting it online.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

The Privacy Protection Act was an awful thing.

Elaborate.

Blatantly unconstitutional and pointless.

You know, when I have private conservation, I don't like when the jerk is then posting it online.

Is the criteria for the constitutionality of a law based solely on whether Kalwejt doesn't like something?

[shua]

I will oppose any such attempt to restore the Privacy Protection Act. We have more to worry about then false impressions, and I think a better way can be found to combat such ignorance then restoring a flawed and potentially unconstitutional law.

I would be very much interested in what can be done to combat such ignorance. Yankee? Kalwejt?
Franzl?

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

I will oppose any such attempt to restore the Privacy Protection Act. We have more to worry about then false impressions, and I think a better way can be found to combat such ignorance then restoring a flawed and potentially unconstitutional law.

I would be very much interested in what can be done to combat such ignorance. Yankee? Kalwejt?
Franzl?

What about a confidentiality of private conversation?

[shua]

I will oppose any such attempt to restore the Privacy Protection Act. We have more to worry about then false impressions, and I think a better way can be found to combat such ignorance then restoring a flawed and potentially unconstitutional law.

I would be very much interested in what can be done to combat such ignorance. Yankee? Kalwejt?
Franzl?

What about a confidentiality of private conversation?

what is that?

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

I really dislike the repeal, but seeing there much more urgent business for Senate, as well as realizing, this have no earthly chance of passing, I'm withdrawing the stuff.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Quick Question:


WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE?


Thank you

[Californian Tony]

New Order of Seniority
NC Yankee
AHDuke99
Bgwah
HappyWarrior
Antonio
Lief
Kalwejt
RowanBrandon
Oakvale
Snowguy715
Shua (Still needs to swear-in)

Wow, I've been there for less than one full term and I'm already in the first half.