How many reported posts/moderated posts/infraction points do you have?

[Hashemite]

37-22-14

[ChairmanSanchez]

6-2-5

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

0/0/0

Losers.

[politicus]

2/1/0

So semi-loser, I guess

[Frodo]

7-2-3

[bgwah]

Do I get a medal? I don't have a lot of infractions points but I've made moderators get on AIM and threaten to ban me.

You've been a prick on AIM bgwah?  That place in my one experience, was a bit of a free fire zone.

That's not what I meant. I meant a moderator (supersoulty if anyone is curious) got really mad at me and messaged me on AIM to threaten me. lol.

[opebo]

Bgwah and opebo should be made moderators.

Absolutely.

Thank you dear friends, but I think the proper phraseology would be 'Bgwah and opebo should be made into moderators'.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

Reported Posts: 200
Moderated Posts: 100
Infraction Points: 71

Will you be c*******d again at 75?

keep up, old man...that was so 45 seconds and 20 death points ago...

Reported Posts: 200
Moderated Posts: 102
Infraction Points: 91

but, in answer to your query - it doesn't appear I was impacted by the mandatory Mod Review at 75 points, seeing how I was already subjected to that round of beating last summer.

« Last Edit: Today at 11:14:51 am by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Post Modified for Trolling with 3 (out of 10) infraction points
»

Inks, you are such a wuss for infracting that post and editing out that statement.  This thread has HISTORICALLY been used to joke about our infractions and now you have a wild hair up your arse and have decided to infract posts in this thread?

I didn't complain about Mr. Morden's salvo of 25 death points yesterday, but infracting this trivial post in this trivial thread is ludicrous.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

Reported Posts: 199
Moderated Posts: 99
Infraction Points: 66

I hear that if I reach 200 Reported Posts and 100 Moderated Posts...I win a set of steak knives.

Inks, here's one where I dared to make a joke using a quote from the movie A Few Good Men.  I'm sure you'll find that one infractionable, also.

[Grumps]

Reported Posts: 200
Moderated Posts: 100
Infraction Points: 71

Will you be c*******d again at 75?

keep up, old man...that was so 45 seconds and 20 death points ago...

Reported Posts: 200
Moderated Posts: 102
Infraction Points: 91

but, in answer to your query - it doesn't appear I was impacted by the mandatory Mod Review at 75 points, seeing how I was already subjected to that round of beating last summer.

« Last Edit: Today at 11:14:51 am by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Post Modified for Trolling with 3 (out of 10) infraction points
»

Inks, you are such a wuss for infracting that post and editing out that statement.  This thread has HISTORICALLY been used to joke about our infractions and now you have a wild hair up your arse and have decided to infract posts in this thread?

I didn't complain about Mr. Morden's salvo of 25 death points yesterday, but infracting this trivial post in this trivial thread is ludicrous.

I agree about Inks point pile on and I think you meant Mr. Moderate, not Mr. Morden

[So the Heroes Fall]

I thought the steak knives reference was Glengarry Glen Ross.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

I agree about Inks point pile on

did you mean "I agree that Inks is piling on"  or did you mean "I agree with Inks' point [you should have been infracted for that post]"?

[Grumps]

I agree about Inks point pile on

did you mean "I agree that Inks is piling on"  or did you mean "I agree with Inks' point [you should have been infracted for that post]"?

No I disagree with Inks infracting you in THIS thread...it's a bitchfest thread to begin with.....if he doesn't like it just delete the whole thread and move on.  JMO

[Grumps]

But I will say, jmf, you really have been inviting the points in the last day or two especially.

[So the Heroes Fall]

bgwah nailed it in the thread introducing the death points system:

This is going to be a train wreck, as this thread exemplifies.

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

I just got five death-points for criticizing the system in this very thread.  And so it begins again.

You got five points for trolling about the system, not actually criticizing it.  Nothing that we have done to you comes anywhere close to a "beating".  You're trolling, plain and simple.  If you wish to genuinely criticize the system, you are 100% free to do so.

And jmfcst, you too were trolling about the system.  Even your signature shows that you are proud of the fact that you are a troll... you wear your points and punishments as badges of honor.  I've stuck up for you in the past, and was one of the few who argued for leniency in your first ban.  You've turned around and taken that gesture of mercy and thrown it to the ground and proceeded to  spit on it.  I really don't want to see you banned; you're a nice guy, and most of the time, you're a good poster, but you have this troll streak in you that you always promise to overcome, but you never do.

[Senator Napoleon]

Inks at what point do you see where you are actually the one trolling? Im being serious.

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

I agree about Inks point pile on

did you mean "I agree that Inks is piling on"  or did you mean "I agree with Inks' point [you should have been infracted for that post]"?

No I disagree with Inks infracting you in THIS thread...it's a bitchfest thread to begin with.....if he doesn't like it just delete the whole thread and move on.  JMO

I think that'd go over even worse than locking the Deluge.

And I have nothing wrong with complaining about infracted posts.  I think it's healthy to challenge the mods on infractions, and I welcome it.  If anyone here thinks I've treated them unfairly, I want you to tell me.

But that's not what opebo and jmfcst have been doing... they take it a step further and cross the line from complaining to trolling, and that brings not only the quality of the forum down, but when the mods crack down on them for their trolling, they play it off as the mods are crushing dissent, and that's not my intent of infracting their posts.

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

Inks at what point do you see where you are actually the one trolling? Im being serious.

How am I trolling?

[Torie]

I just got five death-points for criticizing the system in this very thread.  And so it begins again.

I assume your post was deleted, since I can't find anything. Oh well. Part of the "problem" I suspect is that so little is happening, that folks are bored, so playing mod tag is the only perceived way to assuage one's ennui. And some of the mods may be getting a tad irritable at the game, since they don't enjoy playing as much. And so it goes.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

I think you meant Mr. Moderate, not Mr. Morden

sorry, I don't have eyes in the back of my head

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

I think you meant Mr. Moderate, not Mr. Morden

sorry, I don't have eyes in the back of my head

Even that is taking this whole thing not seriously.  If you took the time to look, you would at least know that Mr. Morden wouldn't have been the one to give you those points.

[So the Heroes Fall]

It's not jmfcst's fault two mods have similar names.

(Not that that's a big deal or the "fault" of said mods either before anyone gets any ideas, just pointing out it's a fairly honest mistake.)

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

It's not jmfcst's fault two mods have similar names.

(Not that that's a big deal or the "fault" of said mods either before anyone gets any ideas, just pointing out it's a fairly honest mistake.)

I'm not saying that it was his fault initially.  Even I've made that mistake.  But to say that he couldn't know because he doesn't have eyes in the back of his head is going a bit far.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

Inks at what point do you see where you are actually the one trolling? Im being serious.

How am I trolling?

You're going out of your way to pile on, superfluously infracting in an area that is normally a DMZ.

You don't have the guts to look a poster in the eye when you attempt kill him.  

---

I think you meant Mr. Moderate, not Mr. Morden

sorry, I don't have eyes in the back of my head

Even that is taking this whole thing not seriously.  If you took the time to look, you would at least know that Mr. Morden wouldn't have been the one to give you those points.

you really really need to get a sense of humor, stat.  how can you follow up the implied joke of that pic with a total buzz kill of a retort?

and what was I suppose to take seriously?  this thread?  surely you jest.

---

but, if you are implying I didn't take his salvo of 25 death points seriously (therefore you are trolling me with trivial infractions)...then you're not following the thread on the US Discussion board, for I am (or was until you distracted and infracted me in this thread) taking the discussion very seriously for the legal battle being discussed is something I have first hand knowledge of – I am involved in the preparations for the upcoming legal battle.

if you are implying I didn't take his salvo of 25 death points seriously in that my posting hasn’t improved…then, again, you’re not following the thread, for I have been careful to avoid inflaming the debate with heated adjectives.

if you are implying I didn't take his salvo of 25 death points seriously because I have created my current sig….my current sig was placed in effect PRIOR to those 25 death points, while I still had 199 reported posts and 99 infracted posts.

if you are implying I didn't take his salvo of 25 death points seriously because I have not taken down my sig…then you can go jump in a lake.  But I might take it down on Memorial Day, since it is a tad disrespectful to the men who earned those medals for real.