Tippecanoe and Webster Too (A Whiggish history of the United States 1839- )
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:50:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Tippecanoe and Webster Too (A Whiggish history of the United States 1839- )
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Tippecanoe and Webster Too (A Whiggish history of the United States 1839- )  (Read 1104 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 02, 2010, 09:57:01 PM »
« edited: July 03, 2010, 01:00:05 PM by True Federalist »

The Whig Party convention meeting in December 1839 had after 5 contentious ballots finally settled on William Henry Harrison as their nominee.  The convention had been a bitter struggle between Clay's and Harrison's supporters.  Some thought was given to putting a Southern Clay supporter on the ticket for balance, the only one to be found willing to accept the nod was John Tyler of Virginia.  While Harrison now lived in Ohio, he had been raised in Virgina which was where Tyler was from.  Besides, Harrison wasn't all that eager to reconcile with Clay.  So instead of a North/South balance the Whigs decided to adopt the choice made earlier by the Anti-Masonic Party and strike an East/West balance by nominating Daniel Webster of Massachusetts for Vice President.

The campaign of 1840 would be almost a mirror image of the one fought in our timeline.  The change in running mate meant that Harrison did slightly less well in the South, and slightly better in the Northeast, but not enough to affect the electoral map beyond altering the margins in various States.



Harrison/Webster 53.1% 234 EV
Van Buren/Johnson 46.6% 60 EV
Birney/Earle 0.3%

As in our timeline, William Henry Harrison takes ill after the inauguration and dies on April 4, 1841. But in this timeline Daniel Webster becomes Acting President of the United States and therein lies all the difference.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2010, 11:24:35 PM »

This looks like it will be really interesting. Keep it coming! Smiley
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2010, 12:00:39 AM »

I like it so far. Smiley
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2010, 03:51:49 AM »

This looks like it will be really interesting. Keep it coming! Smiley
Logged
Magic 8-Ball
mrk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,674
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2010, 03:59:37 AM »

Hmm, I may have to stop by this corner of the Atlas more often.  Webster is one of my favorite failed presidential candidates.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2010, 09:09:46 PM »
« Edited: July 03, 2010, 09:40:00 PM by True Federalist »

With the Whigs solidly in control of the 27th Congress, and a Whig in charge of the executive branch, things looked to be promising of the passage of the Whig platform into law during the special session of Congress that had been called for before Harrison's death and which began on May 31.

Webster's interpretation of the ambiguous constitutional clause concerning secession meant that he remained Vice President and thus President of the Senate as well as Acting President of the United States, but day-to-day procedural matters of the Senate were left to the President pro tempore, John Tyler of Virginia. Despite the Whig majority, because Webster did not always see eye-to-eye with Clay, Webster would need to occasionally cast a tie-breaking vote in the Senate as its President.

The special session had reluctantly been called by Harrison because the public fisc was endangered.  The Compromise Tariff of 1833 had called for a gradual ratcheting down of the tariff rates, with a large final reduction to take effect January 1, 1842.  Hence even without the desire of the Whigs (especially Clay) to raise the tariff for protectionist purposes, something needed to be done.  Disagreement within the Whigs was over how high to raise the tariff and how broad based it should be. Webster did not wish to be rushed into such a decision and hence vetoed two efforts to quickly raise the tariff rates.  What finally would pass was the Tariff Act of 1841, a stopgap measure that provided that tariff reduction scheduled for  January 1, 1842 was canceled.  It would not be until the 28th Congress that Webster would propose a new tariff based upon the recommendations compiled by Webster's second Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Charles Carey.  The Carey Tariff, as the Tariff Act of 1844 was generally called, was similar to the Walker Tariff (Tariff Act of 1846) of our own time line, except that the rates were higher as both the generation of revenue and protectionism were its aims.  The Warehousing Act of 1844 (1846 in OTL) would also see considerable change in how customs were collected.

Webster would also leave his impact on the legislation reestablishing a government bank.  Rather than simply regranting the Second Bank of the United States its former status and privileges, Webster was determined to both blunt Democratic charges of a corrupt handout and to build a bank that would help spread the Whig economic program to every State.  The Federal Bank of the United States was therefore a totally new institution.  The name Federal Bank was not simply an attempt to avoid calling it the Third Bank.  States could choose to form a State Bank with certain requirements that would serve as the official collector of State revenues and be affiliated with the Federal Bank.  If a State did so, the Federal Bank would work in that State via the State Bank instead of independently and the State would get to select one director to sit on the board of the Federal Bank, and the Federal Bank would select one of the nine directors of a State Bank.

The Allotment Act of 1841 would allow settlers to establish homesteads on the public lands and pay for them later on the installment plan, provided that they farmed them for a period of eight years.  The Act would serve to increase western migration and settlement.

The Rail Road Act of 1842 established certain Federal subsidies for rail roads that met certain standards and provided that land be set aside for the right-of-way needed by rail roads.  While not early as generous as the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 in our time line, as the government selected the route and the railroad would only get 1/20th the land that they would get in our time line (320 acres per mile instead of 6400 acres per mile).  One effect of the Rail Road Act was that the standard rail gauge of the United States in this time line would be 5 feet instead of the gauge of 4 feet 8½ inches that it is in our time line.

These legislative accomplishments would mean that unlike in our time line, the Whigs would be seen as responsible for the economic prosperity of the United States during this period, and they would retain control of both Houses during the 28th Congress instead of just the Senate. (130 - 97 House; 31 - 21 Senate).
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2010, 12:39:47 PM »

Foreign affairs would receive less attention in this timeline than in our timeline.  In our timeline Daniel Webster had devoted considerable attention to resolving border issues with the United Kingdom that caused him to remain as Secretary of State long after the rest of the cabinet had resigned rather than put up with John Tyler.  This had resulted in the Webster–Ashburton Treaty of 1842.

In contrast, this timeline's Secretary of State, John Bell, would spend relatively little energy on foreign affairs.  He'd have rather been Secretary of War (as he was in our timeline) but that post had instead gone to Lott Warren of Georgia.  So Bell left foreign affairs largely in the hands of the diplomats, who were in no particular hurry to resolve that dispute and instead focused his interests on the creation of a single unified department to handle various interior matters as had been proposed from time since the start of Washington's administration.

Oddly enough, the State and Foreign Affairs Act of 1842 would do much to professionalize United States diplomacy despite Bell's disinterest in foreign affairs. For the first time, ministers (i.e. ambassadors) and some consuls would receive a salary in exchange for no longer being able to conduct private business at the same time as they represented the United States abroad.  (Consuls in less important ports and cities where a full-time diplomatic presence was not needed would continue as before, with their only remittance for serving the United States being the receipt of fees for certain diplomatic services.) This reform would not take place until 1856 in our timeline.  With the Department of Foreign Affairs formed out of the Department of State, the State department received various functions such as the Public Land Office that had been in the Treasury department and the Indian Affairs Office of the War department that in our timeline would be consolidated into the Department of the Interior in 1849.

Thomas Williams of Connecticut would be confirmed as the first Secretary of Foreign Affairs.  With someone at last actively managing diplomacy in Washington, the British Foreign Secretary, the Earl of Aberdeen at last sent the Baron Ashburton to Washington some nine months later than in our timeline to negotiate the boundary disputes and other concerns that affected Anglo-American relations.  The resulting Williams-Ashburton treaty of 1843 is similar to our timeline's Webster-Ashbuton treaty of 1842, with the most significant border differences being that border of Maine was settled in accordance with the 1831 arbitration decision of the King of the Netherlands, resulting in Maine getting some territory that in our timeline is part of Quebec, whereas the Northwest Angle of the Wisconsin Territory (part of modern Minnesota) was ceded to Brittan.  Another difference was that treaty also settled the Oregon border as per the 1846 Oregon Treaty of our timeline.

This would leave only the Texas Question as an external issue that would have a significant impact on the 1844 elections.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2010, 12:44:41 PM »

This is very good. Keep it coming!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 12 queries.