The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:05:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The futur of the dem party must be Edwards or H Clinton? (to win next election)
#1
Edwards (I'm D)
 
#2
Hillary Clinton (I'm D)
 
#3
Edwards (I'm R)
 
#4
Hillary Clinton (I'm R)
 
#5
Edwards (I'm other)
 
#6
Hillary Clinton (I'm other)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary?  (Read 37983 times)
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« on: November 03, 2004, 06:29:03 PM »

Edwards is not Presidential enough, in my opinion. Hillary would not do any better than Kerry, except she would have a better team, and could probably squeak out a few states, based on a better team than Kerry. She has the Clinton War Machine, which is up on the same level of Karl Rove. I think Howard Dean will be back, there are many Democrats who think he'd have been better than Kerry. If they are looking for a Southern Democrat to run, Edwards is not it. Possibly Mark Warner of Virginia, and maybe Mark Pryor of Arkansas for VP. Of course, that would tick off of the Dean branch, unless they realize they need the win so badly to put aside differences.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 15 queries.