A (Rhetorical Question) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:45:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate
  Political Essays & Deliberation (Moderator: Torie)
  A (Rhetorical Question) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A (Rhetorical Question)  (Read 16018 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« on: July 30, 2010, 06:02:31 PM »

Sorry, but Nobel Prize-winning economist F.A. Hayek already explained that socialism is inherently unworkable because it cannot account for all the calculations that automatically occur under capitalism

Appeal To Authority.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2010, 12:21:51 PM »

Does no one think it might be possible to have an economic system that involves both a state and free market forces?

I understand that most people in the real world accept that this is a good idea and that any attempt to totally eliminate either (I don't especially like the term 'free market forces' - partly because it's a bit of a tautology - but I'll run with it as a surrogate for 'markets') generally leads to disaster, but you must remember that this is not the real world. This is the internet, where all your crazy dreams can come true!
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2010, 07:14:30 PM »

I've always found his approach to be more that of an especially committed Trot, but Creationist works about as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.