92,000 damning documents

[© tweed]

Yes, fighting wars is the constitutionally authorized job of the federal govt.

but not of the executive branch, nor is anything remotely like the CIA authorized by the Constitution, which serves as the executive's organized mob, carrying out mass murder behind a curtain abroad for what is now 50+ years.  the internet serves as a vehicle to expose the crimes in a way never before possible.

[© tweed]

The White House says, Blame Bush.

while supporting the aspirations of the Pakistani people.



shameless

[© tweed]

I'm not sure if this tells us much that we couldn't work out already. At least in general terms.

correct, but now it's getting widespread MSM attention

[© tweed]

I'm not sure if this tells us much that we couldn't work out already. At least in general terms.

correct, but now it's getting widespread MSM attention

Oh, true, true. Just a little surprised by the shock.

everyone on this end of the club is always shocked when intentions and results prove non-benign.

[© tweed]

The documents aren't that important at all, but mostly ground-level intelligence collections.

Nonetheless, the action was clearly illegal and principally can't be tolerated.  Those involved should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and if the law doesn't go far enough, it's time to renew the wartime sedition law.

I'm assuming you mean the 1918 Act.  if so, how are we to define "at war?"  unlike WWI, Congress has not declared war, and if we are in fact "at war" right now we can assume the state of war to be perpetual and without end.