Primary Calendar Bad for Big Cities
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:47:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Primary Calendar Bad for Big Cities
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Primary Calendar Bad for Big Cities  (Read 3197 times)
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 01, 2010, 12:35:34 PM »

Does anyone else feel that the current system of primaries/caucuses forces candidates to cater their messages towards the interests of rural/small town/and suburban voters. IA and NH largely decide the fates of candidates as well as SC. NV has Las Vegas but that's not like a real big city. I wish Illinois, NY, CA, TX, or PA could be chosen as an early primary state especially, perhaps NY.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 01:21:56 PM »

New Hampshire really isn't that awful, but Iowa is, since every candidate is forced to put themselves in the pocket of Big Corn.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2010, 02:27:09 PM »

The problem is big cities are expensive to advertise in, thus tilting the race against dark horse and insurgent candidates.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2010, 03:17:52 PM »

New Hampshire really isn't that awful, but Iowa is, since every candidate is forced to put themselves in the pocket of Big Corn.
I'm not saying that NH is bad or good but it has no major cities. Instead of focusing on urban policy (housing, environment, public education), the candidates initially focus on corn subsidies, agriculture policies, and rural issues.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2010, 07:08:30 AM »

The whole primary system, where in most cases few small states decide about everything at very start, is bad.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2010, 07:42:17 PM »

The problem is big cities are expensive to advertise in, thus tilting the race against dark horse and insurgent candidates.

^^^^

Does anyone else feel that the current system of primaries/caucuses forces candidates to cater their messages towards the interests of rural/small town/and suburban voters. IA and NH largely decide the fates of candidates as well as SC. NV has Las Vegas but that's not like a real big city. I wish Illinois, NY, CA, TX, or PA could be chosen as an early primary state especially, perhaps NY.

No thanks, the big cities have enough power as is. Besides, your system would guarantee a Clinton/Giuliani style election every time.

Isn't southern New Hampshire fairly close to Boston, anyway?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2010, 08:23:53 PM »

Is there really that much difference between urban Republicans and rural Republicans or between urban Democrats and rural Democrats as to make this an issue?
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2010, 08:06:53 AM »

Is there really that much difference between urban Republicans and rural Republicans or between urban Democrats and rural Democrats as to make this an issue?

Actually, there's a great deal of difference.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2010, 12:19:50 PM »

Is there really that much difference between urban Republicans and rural Republicans or between urban Democrats and rural Democrats as to make this an issue?

Actually, there's a great deal of difference.

In which party and what do you see as the differences?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.