Supreme Court and the Individual Health Insurance Mandate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:56:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Supreme Court and the Individual Health Insurance Mandate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Supreme Court and the Individual Health Insurance Mandate  (Read 49278 times)
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« on: June 28, 2012, 09:26:18 AM »

Torie wins the award.
Logged
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 09:32:23 AM »

FL in 2000?

Logged
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2012, 10:16:29 AM »

Is Kennedy really a swing vote or just a libertarian?
Logged
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2012, 10:38:09 AM »

I'm so happy that on one day, one judge was able to make a decision that wasn't based on his/her politcal ideology. This is supposed to be how the system works. I know that liberals have also won key battles through unelected courts as well. Law is supposed to be made by elected officials.
Logged
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2012, 12:17:28 PM »

Alright my question now is, what does "denying coverage mean."

If you are someone who has had back problems or diabetes, what is an insurance company allowed to do in 2014?

1) Give you coverage, but not for back/diabetes related problems.
2) Give you coverage for the ailments, but charge more.
3) Cover the ailments at the same price as everyone else.
4) Something else?

If number #3, is someone allowed to get health insurance at the same cost as everyone else right (provided they paid the tax) after being diagnosed with a terminal or highly deadly disease?
Logged
JohnCA246
mokbubble
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 639


« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2012, 02:46:40 PM »

(Sorry posted this in the wrong thread.)

Alright my question now is, what does "denying coverage mean."

If you are someone who has had back problems or diabetes, what is an insurance company allowed to do in 2014?

1) Give you coverage, but not for back/diabetes related problems.
2) Give you coverage for the ailments, but charge more.
3) Cover the ailments at the same price as everyone else.
4) Something else?

If number #3, is someone allowed to get health insurance at the same cost as everyone else right (provided they paid the tax) after being diagnosed with a terminal or highly deadly disease?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.