US Regions - Oklahoma
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:00:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US Regions - Oklahoma
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In which region do you consider Oklahoma would better fit ?
#1
Outer South (red region)
#2
Deep South (blue region)
#3
Plains (green region)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: US Regions - Oklahoma  (Read 2036 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,155
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 23, 2010, 03:14:53 PM »

Here are the three regions materialized on maps, in order to avoid confusion (light shades mean hypothetical).

Outer South :



Deep South :



Plains :



Please try to think about these options out of their context : the question isn't about the regions themselves, just about Oklahoma.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2010, 03:27:36 PM »

I voted Plains.



This is a map of the Presidential election results from 1952. The dividing line between the South and the Plains is obvious. The biggest population centers (Oklahoma City, Tulsa) are in the Republican (Plains) area, and the state as a whole was a 9-point victory for Eisenhower, so Plains is the better fit.

Similar patterns can be found in other election years as well.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,801


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2010, 08:46:42 PM »

I vote for the Plains. The Little Dixie region would fit either of the South regions, but it's a small part of the state's population. There is certainly a connection with TX through the oil economy, but that doesn't reflect the politics or demographics. In those regards, KS is a much better fit.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,155
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2010, 05:32:28 AM »

Plains seem the right option to me (I'd rank DS as a second choice).
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2010, 11:07:55 AM »

Plains first....clearly and even the panhandle of Texas is plains (to address muon2's point).
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2010, 05:49:25 PM »

Plains, though would be hell if that was an option.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2010, 12:20:21 AM »

Oklahoma is one of those states that fits into several regions.  The panhandle is in the Inter-Mountain West and High Plains.  Western Oklahoma is in the Plains.  Southeastern Oklahoma is in the Deep South.  Northeastern Oklahoma is in the Midwest with the Ozarks starting just northeast of Tulsa.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 13 queries.