US Regions - Utah
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:14:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US Regions - Utah
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In which region do you consider Utah would better fit ?
#1
Big Sky (red region)
#2
Southwest (blue region)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: US Regions - Utah  (Read 1071 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 23, 2010, 03:49:40 PM »

And finally, the last one ! Tongue

Here are the two regions materialized on maps, in order to avoid confusion (light shades mean hypothetical). As usual.

Big Sky :



Southwest :



Please try to think about these options, bla bla bla...
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2010, 04:29:11 PM »

I voted Big Sky. While this makes the Southwest less than appealing visually, Utah's center of population is far north in the state (about halfway between Salt Lake City and Provo), and that area is more similar culturally and politically to places like Idaho and Wyoming than much of the Southwest.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,408
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2010, 04:37:24 PM »

'Big Sky' easily. Utah doesn't have the Hispanic population of the others, nor does it have the culture and sociology of the others.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2010, 04:51:17 PM »

I voted southwest because like those states, it is overwhelmingly urban and suburban, with water issues a major factor. Utah will always be unique so it's a choice of which direction you choose to compromise in. It seems wrong to sever it from Idaho, but conversely it has far more in common with Arizona than it does with Montana.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2010, 08:20:50 PM »

I agree with this quote exactly, and I voted for Big Sky.

I voted Big Sky. While this makes the Southwest less than appealing visually, Utah's center of population is far north in the state (about halfway between Salt Lake City and Provo), and that area is more similar culturally and politically to places like Idaho and Wyoming than much of the Southwest.

Of course I would put CO in the Big Sky as well and the picture would look nicer, but that wasn't an option here. Tongue

I voted southwest because like those states, it is overwhelmingly urban and suburban, with water issues a major factor. Utah will always be unique so it's a choice of which direction you choose to compromise in. It seems wrong to sever it from Idaho, but conversely it has far more in common with Arizona than it does with Montana.

In response to this view I would note that water is a big issue in ID and WY as well. As Boise grows in the coming decades, I expect it to have the kind of urban population you associate with UT. The spillover from Utah's Mormon culture has been to ID more than any other state, so they really should stay together as your gut seems to suggest.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2010, 05:16:48 AM »

Of course I would put CO in the Big Sky as well and the picture would look nicer, but that wasn't an option here. Tongue

Eh, Colorado was a tough call for me, but the only way to create a consistent Southwest region was to include Colorado. I'm following a "4-10 States rule" in order to avoid disproportionate regions.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2010, 07:26:54 AM »

Of course I would put CO in the Big Sky as well and the picture would look nicer, but that wasn't an option here. Tongue

Eh, Colorado was a tough call for me, but the only way to create a consistent Southwest region was to include Colorado. I'm following a "4-10 States rule" in order to avoid disproportionate regions.

That wouldn't be a problem if you put TX in the Southwest. Smiley
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2010, 07:36:52 AM »

Of course I would put CO in the Big Sky as well and the picture would look nicer, but that wasn't an option here. Tongue

Eh, Colorado was a tough call for me, but the only way to create a consistent Southwest region was to include Colorado. I'm following a "4-10 States rule" in order to avoid disproportionate regions.

That wouldn't be a problem if you put TX in the Southwest. Smiley

True, n this case it would make Colorado in play.

If you want, you can also discuss Colorado in this thread, and I will consider the possibility of putting it into BS, even though I still prefer SW so far.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2010, 05:33:58 AM »

Clearly Big Sky for me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.