INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 05:12:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16
Author Topic: INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE)  (Read 174032 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: October 21, 2010, 10:19:47 AM »


Meanwhile, DCCC threw its first money of the cycle at Shuler yesterday.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: October 21, 2010, 04:42:42 PM »

Tarrance Group(R) for Steve Pearce

Pearce: 50%
Teague: 41%

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/10/steve-pearce-poll-shows-him-le.html?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: October 21, 2010, 05:52:48 PM »

Tim Walz (D) in MN-01 has him up 50-34.
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: October 22, 2010, 01:13:46 AM »


Is there anymore polling going on in NC-11, or is the DCCC it? I'd love to see a more credible survey on this race. This district is historically Republican, and was in Republican hands for at least 20 years before Shuler won it in 06.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: October 22, 2010, 07:11:34 AM »

Scott Rigell (R) in VA-02 has him up 46-41 over Glenn Nye (D), with 5% to the independent.

Dem poll of VA-05 has Robert Hurt (R) ahead of Tom Perriello (D) by 47-46, with 3% for the independent.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: October 22, 2010, 08:14:16 AM »

Tarrance Group(R) IA-02

Miller-Meeks (R): 45
Loebsack (D): 44

http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2010/10/22/miller-meeks-leads-loebsack-45-to-44-in-new-poll/comment-page-1/
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: October 22, 2010, 08:38:43 AM »

Tarrance Group(R)

MS-04

Palazzo(R): 43%
Taylor(D): 41%

http://www.scribd.com/doc/39861528/MS-04-Tarrance-for-Palazzo-Oct-2010
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: October 22, 2010, 08:57:15 AM »


Is there anymore polling going on in NC-11, or is the DCCC it? I'd love to see a more credible survey on this race. This district is historically Republican, and was in Republican hands for at least 20 years before Shuler won it in 06.
When one candidate releases internals showing himself well up, and the other candidate doesn't release any internals at all, it *tends to* mean their own internals agree with the other side's assessment.
Meanwhile, when one side releases internals showing themselves tied or worse but at least a lot better than the last few cycles, and the other side doesn't release anything, it *tends to* mean they have reason not to consider the opponent worthy of attention.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,590
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: October 22, 2010, 09:56:38 AM »


That's not true. It is historically a 'marginal' Democratic district that became a more genuine marginal in the 1970s. In the 80s it was a ridiculous swing district, changing hands in 1980, 1982, 1984 and 1986.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sixteen years and never really securely (at least by American standards). That louse Taylor lucked out with piss poor opponents for years before getting hit by a wave in 2006.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,802
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: October 22, 2010, 10:06:30 AM »


That's not true. It is historically a 'marginal' Democratic district that became a more genuine marginal in the 1970s. In the 80s it was a ridiculous swing district, changing hands in 1980, 1982, 1984 and 1986.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sixteen years and never really securely (at least by American standards). That louse Taylor lucked out with piss poor opponents for years before getting hit by a wave in 2006.

This district IS republican +6. in a big wave, republicans should be leading here. and they aren't
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: October 22, 2010, 10:08:44 AM »

Whenever citing PVI while talking about House races, please remember that Democrats tend to underpoll (or Republicans tend to overpoll, use whichever you like) in presidential races in poor and/or nonmetropolitan areas compared to their actual strength there, which is more evident in House races.
Thank you.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: October 22, 2010, 06:53:37 PM »

John Loughlin (R) in RI-01 is claming a 41-41 tie with David Cicilline (D).
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,802
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: October 22, 2010, 06:55:41 PM »


LoL
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: October 22, 2010, 07:11:40 PM »


I'd love to see it.  I was widely mocked on this website for claiming the RI-01 race could be close after Scott Brown's victory and Patrick Kennedy's decision not to run again.  (Kennedy might have been doing worse than Cicilline, though).
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: October 22, 2010, 07:17:09 PM »

If RI-01 were anything near close, the parties would be throwing money at it. Loughlin also hasn't raised much; about 1/3 of Cicilline's take so far.

Dem poll puts Maurice Hinchey (D) in NY-22 up 51-34.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: October 22, 2010, 07:21:20 PM »

If RI-01 were anything near close, the parties would be throwing money at it. Loughlin also hasn't raised much; about 1/3 of Cicilline's take so far.

Dem poll puts Maurice Hinchey (D) in NY-22 up 51-34.

Show us your actual poll, Hinchey.  If you're shopping it, New York law requires it be filed with the Board within 48 hours.  We'd love to see the wording of the questions.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: October 22, 2010, 07:29:10 PM »

It's for the DCCC, not Hinchey.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: October 22, 2010, 07:32:37 PM »


Under New York law, that doesn't matter:

§ 6201.2 Use of Public Opinion Polls

No candidate, political party or committee shall attempt to promote the success or defeat of a candidate by directly or indirectly disclosing or causing to be disclosed the results of a poll relating to a candidate for such an office or position, unless within 48 hours after such disclosure, they provide the following information concerning the poll to the board or officer with whom statements or copies of statements of campaign receipts and expenditures are required to be filed by the candidate to whom such poll relates:

   a. The name of the person, party or organization that contracted for or who commissioned the poll and/or paid for it.
   b. The name and address of the organization that conducted the poll.
   c. The numerical size of the total poll sample, the geographic area covered by the poll and any special characteristics of the population included in the poll sample.
   d. The exact wording of the questions asked in the poll and the sequence of such questions.
   e. The method of polling–whether by personal interview, telephone, mail or other.
   f. The time period during which the poll was conducted.
   g. The number of persons in the poll sample: the number contacted who responded to each specific poll question; the number of persons contacted who did not so respond.
   h. The results of the poll.

http://www.elections.state.ny.us/RunningOffice.html
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: October 22, 2010, 07:55:27 PM »

Is that even enforceable for Congressional candidates? I mean, what's the penalty for not doing so?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: October 22, 2010, 08:16:01 PM »

Is that even enforceable for Congressional candidates? I mean, what's the penalty for not doing so?

Good question, since their reports go to the FEC, not the state.  I have no idea what the penalty is - probably not much - though the shame from not complying with the law ought to be enough, if used properly by the opponent. 

You will see that for most New York internals, the polling memo often ends up online somewhere.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: October 23, 2010, 04:48:29 AM »


Laugh all you want, but Obama is actually heading to RI to make a last-minute campaign stop for Cicilline, and ... Hmm, perhaps we just added two and two?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,802
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: October 23, 2010, 06:40:36 AM »


If it's tied in a republican internal, cicilline should be safe.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,047
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: October 23, 2010, 10:32:44 AM »

Here is one where Norm Dicks (WA-6) is down by 4%, 48-44.  Whatever.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,802
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: October 23, 2010, 10:47:08 AM »

Here is one where Norm Dicks (WA-6) is down by 4%, 48-44.  Whatever.

That poll is a sh**t.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: October 23, 2010, 01:46:34 PM »

Here is one where Norm Dicks (WA-6) is down by 4%, 48-44.  Whatever.

Hahahaha
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.