INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:20:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: INTERNAL POLL DUMP (PUT ALL INTERNAL HOUSE POLLS HERE)  (Read 174479 times)
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« on: September 02, 2010, 02:54:50 AM »

LOL.  The man is proudly demonstrating on his website the fact that a high-profile incumbent like himself is winning only 40% of the voters in the district.  I'm willing to bet 80-90% of those "Others" and "Undecideds" lean Republican (given that close to 45% of Self-identified Republicans apparently aren't yet backing Webster) and will come home for Webster in November.  No way Grayson, of all Democrats, is going to win 4-1 among independent voters.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2010, 08:16:09 PM »

If this poll is accurate, does it mean that voters prefer a person who has real principles than one who "becomes" a conservative to be reelected??

See my post above.  The Fact that he's actually under-polling by so so much in this district (40% is one of the lowest I've seen for an incumbent Democrat this cycle) suggest that his "lead" comes far more from a fractured opposition than from his own likability or support.  Let me make a bet that the 23% in this poll that supports an "Other" candidate aren't referring to the Green party ticket line.

I'll bet he loses, at best (for him) 45-55 in November.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2010, 07:21:14 PM »


Don't be so sure.  This is the only Democratic strategy this cycle that might actually work for them.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2010, 02:22:50 AM »

Heck, he`s gaining !

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/56_27/atr/50053-1.html

...

So, the 9-point SUSA lead isnīt so far off and they also have it getting closer.

It's an internal, and one showing the payer losing.  In other words, about a 10-point edge for Herrera is likely
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2010, 03:09:20 PM »


Cao is down 10 in a Dem internal in the district?  This one might be salvageable after all.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2010, 12:13:37 AM »


Ah, so did the polling method here just consist of blatantly making up numbers? Reminds me of Strategic Vision.

It's not entirely unlikely if you just assume all the undecideds break for Thompson.  The district is probably the most raciall polarized in teh country, with the Republican getting more than 80% of the White vote and the Democrat getting more than 90% of the Black vote.  The problem is that the district itself is actually 63.5% Black, which kind of destroys the Republican's chances.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2010, 05:33:36 AM »


Ah, so did the polling method here just consist of blatantly making up numbers? Reminds me of Strategic Vision.

It's not entirely unlikely if you just assume all the undecideds break for Thompson.  The district is probably the most raciall polarized in teh country, with the Republican getting more than 80% of the White vote and the Democrat getting more than 90% of the Black vote.  The problem is that the district itself is actually 63.5% Black, which kind of destroys the Republican's chances.

Every undecided breaking for an incumbent? Yeah, that happens. Tongue

It's a common strategy for internal polling to try to get your opponent's supporters as "Undecideds".  It helps to completely "Honestly" boos your own relative numbers.  34% sounds about right for a Republican in this district
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2010, 04:55:20 AM »


Doesn't seem too far out from what I would expect actually.  The district is not very Democratic.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2010, 07:32:48 AM »

I don't know if this is technically an internal, but if sure feels like one:

http://www.freep.com/article/20101008/NEWS15/10080315/1318/Poll-In-House-race-Rob-Steele-leads-John-Dingell-by-4-points#ixzz11lRK7KCa

Steele is up on Dingell 44-40

MOE: 5.6%
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2010, 11:34:47 AM »

MS-04

Democratic internal:
Taylor +8

Unspecified percentages, pollster, dates, MOE

Republican internal:
Taylor (D)(i) - 45%
Palazzo (R)  - 41%

Tarrance Group; September 21-22; MOE +/- 5.8%



Wow, i didn't expect to see this one so close.  Talyor is probably the most Conservative Democrat in congress right now, and his seat would be an easy GOP hold should they pick it up.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2010, 12:27:19 PM »

Again, I don't know if it's an Internal, but:

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM136_101010_grijalva_poll.html

Grijalva 40, McClung 38
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.