PPP- PALIN SECOND PLACE TO ROMNEY IN ALASKA!!!!!!!

[ej2mm15]

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_AK_901.pdf

805 +-3.5

Romney 20%
Palin 17%
Huckabee 17%
Gingrich 16%
Paul 10%

Red-Romney
Blue-Huckabee
Green-Palin
Yellow-Gingrich
Dark Green-Demint

[DrScholl]

Even her own state doesn't want her as the nominee, that's pretty bad.

[Bull Moose Base]

A.  It makes more sense than supporting someone just because they're from your state.
B.  She just took another shot against murkowski who has a lot of fans in Alaska.

[Poundingtherock]

Actually, PPP was completely wrong in the Alaska senate race.  They said Murkowski was a lock.

So I don't see why you would consider them credible.

[Meeker]

Why are you people so fascinated by state polling a year and a half out? These will have no meaning come election day.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Why are you people so fascinated by state polling a year and a half out? These will have no meaning come election day.

     Everyone loves having the chance to fill in a state-by-state map, you see.

[Tender Branson]

Actually, PPP was completely wrong in the Alaska senate race.  They said Murkowski was a lock.

So I don't see why you would consider them credible.

They didn´t even poll the GOP Senate race as far as I know ...

[minionofmidas]

Why are you people so fascinated by state polling a year and a half out? These will have no meaning come election day.

Especially as this isn't going to be the candidate field.

[Hash]

Alaskan polling also sucks.

[Poundingtherock]

What PPP wrote:

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/06/does-palins-endorsement-even-matter.html

"Folks who don't pay a lot of attention to Alaska polling numbers might assume that Sarah Palin is by far the most popular Republican in the state and that Lisa Murkowski could be seriously affected by Palin's endorsement of her primary opponent...but that's not true. Murkowski's 77/13 approval with Republican voters is almost identical to Palin's 78/15 favorability. Because of that Murkowski won't likely see much negative effect from Palin's action.

And for what it's worth when you get beyond the GOP base in Alaska Murkowski is much more popular than Palin- a 52/36 approval spread compared to the former Governor's 47/45 favorability."

You know what happened in reality.

[Associate Justice PiT]

     That was back in early June, though. What was that, almost three months prior to the primary election?

[Poundingtherock]

Yes and they were wrong back then.

The notion that Miller came back in the last two weeks from thirty points down is bs.  if that were true, they wouldn't have split the absentees evenly.

The polls were always wrong about Murkowski, Miller, and Palin.

[Eraserhead]

Stop polling Alaska.

[Capitan Zapp Brannigan]

It's a useless poll but it's still hilarious.

[ajc0918]

GO MITT 2012

[California8429]

lol. As I'd expect, it's a complete tie between all the candidates. Should be fun to watch during the Romney-Gingrich showdown

[sentinel]

Eskimos don't have phones. This poll is crap!

[Tender Branson]

Yes and they were wrong back then.

The notion that Miller came back in the last two weeks from thirty points down is bs.  if that were true, they wouldn't have split the absentees evenly.

The polls were always wrong about Murkowski, Miller, and Palin.

That was 1 opinion of the PPP guy 3 months before the primary, not a poll.

[Poundingtherock]

it was an opinion based on a poll it conducted in Alaska.  As you can see from the alaska results, the poll was clearly wrong.

An incumbent with a 77% rating doesn't lose to someone with she outspent 10-to-1.  So it makes sense that she never had a 77% rating and that PPP missed back then,.

[Rowan]

it was an opinion based on a poll it conducted in Alaska.  As you can see from the alaska results, the poll was clearly wrong.

An incumbent with a 77% rating doesn't lose to someone with she outspent 10-to-1.  So it makes sense that she never had a 77% rating and that PPP missed back then,.

Can you stop being an annoying Sarah Palin hack for once? Please.

[Rowan]

You're talking about a damn poll taken in January! You do realize that is about 9 months ago right? Nothing has changed in 9 months at all. Nothing. You're right.

[tpfkaw]

GO MITT 2012

*Vomits*