WV: Public Policy Polling: Raese overtakes Mr. Popular (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 11:05:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  WV: Public Policy Polling: Raese overtakes Mr. Popular (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WV: Public Policy Polling: Raese overtakes Mr. Popular  (Read 4316 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« on: September 21, 2010, 10:48:56 AM »

Surprising, given Rasmussen. Hopefully we'll get more polls from more companies now; it's been hard to work out what's actually going on, as all indications point in different directions (Manchin is popular, but Obama isn't, Raese is a poor candidate, but is absolutely loaded...) and basing things off the work of just one outfit isn't that helpful.

PPP's record in WV is a little confusing; in 2008 they got the Presidential election bang-on (McCain +13; same as reality), did well in the Gubernatorial election (Manchin +42; reality was +44) but did very badly in the Senate election (Rockefeller +18; reality was +27). Take your pick.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2010, 03:16:10 PM »

I think everyone here is thinking this but it's worth writing down anyway... if Manchin actually were to lose, it's likely that these elections will be every bit as bad for the Democrats as the more fevered speculation suggests, as his only serious problem is the national picture. The same goes for a heavy Feingold defeat in Wisconsin.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.