PA-11/Critical Insights: Barletta (R) ahead by double digits
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:19:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  PA-11/Critical Insights: Barletta (R) ahead by double digits
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-11/Critical Insights: Barletta (R) ahead by double digits  (Read 1149 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2010, 01:59:23 AM »

WARNING: Only 221 people polled, MoE = 7% !!!

43% Lou Barletta (R)
32% Paul Kanjorski (D-Inc.)
25% Undecided

http://www.timesleader.com/news/Poll-indicates-Barletta-leading-Kanjorski.html
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2010, 02:13:52 AM »

     Someone was cutting corners here. Too bad we probably won't be getting any better polls out of this district.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2010, 04:02:10 AM »

Kanjorski really, really ought to have been primaried successfully.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2010, 08:57:58 AM »

Doesn't really matter if there are any polls out of here -- the fact that Kanjo only won 52-48 in 2008 despite a 15-point Obama victory there *and* Kanjo outspending Barletta a few times over means that he's DOA this year.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2010, 09:20:54 AM »

Doesn't really matter if there are any polls out of here -- the fact that Kanjo only won 52-48 in 2008 despite a 15-point Obama victory there *and* Kanjo outspending Barletta a few times over means that he's DOA this year.
Or should be, anyways. Short of serious changes in perception of the two.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2010, 04:07:49 PM »

There may be the possibility to drive from pPhilly to Pittsburgh in GOP districts.  I still think the Dems hold PA 12.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2010, 04:46:47 PM »

Barletta can enjoy his one term here.  No way he survives the Obama wave against a decent Democratic candidate in 2012. 
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,027
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2010, 11:51:20 PM »

If Carney hangs on, redistricting might just shove Scranton and Wilkes-Barre into his district. Then both incumbents would probably be safe.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2010, 12:44:20 AM »

If Carney hangs on, redistricting might just shove Scranton and Wilkes-Barre into his district. Then both incumbents would probably be safe.

Well if Carney and Barletta both lose, I could see Republicans trying to have it both ways by putting Scranton back into PA-10 to protect Barletta.  PA-11 even without Scranton still has some very Democratic counties and would still be a perenial Democratic target.  On the other hand, putting Scranton back in PA-10 would instantly turn that from an R+8 district to an R+0 or R+1 district and would make someone as weak as Marino an almost certain loser in the better Democratic year of 2012 against someone like Pat Casey.

Republicans are not going to be able to keep BOTH of these seats long term.  If they try to keep both, they will both end up being Democratic pickups in the next good Democratic year(probably 2012).
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2010, 11:12:46 PM »

We're anticipated to be down one seat, so that might make a difference.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2010, 12:31:06 AM »

the 11th District is only D + 4 in it's current form, which is towards the upper end of What Republicans can hold in a neutral cycle.  If the GOP sweeps NE PA, they might try to bring this one down to even, and keep the 10th at R + 5 or so.

But if they wind up in control of Redistricting again, you might see a Scranton to Allentown district get drawn to leave the region 2-1 Republican.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2010, 02:20:33 AM »

the 11th District is only D + 4 in it's current form, which is towards the upper end of What Republicans can hold in a neutral cycle.  If the GOP sweeps NE PA, they might try to bring this one down to even, and keep the 10th at R + 5 or so.

But if they wind up in control of Redistricting again, you might see a Scranton to Allentown district get drawn to leave the region 2-1 Republican.

Barletta is very far to the right for a D+4 district or even an even district.  You couldnt bring this district to even without bringing PA-10 down to about R+1. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.