NV: Rasmussen: Sharron Angle (R) hits the 50% mark against Reid
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:08:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  NV: Rasmussen: Sharron Angle (R) hits the 50% mark against Reid
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: NV: Rasmussen: Sharron Angle (R) hits the 50% mark against Reid  (Read 3252 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 08, 2010, 06:15:09 PM »


Intrade seems to be a lagging indicator, and if I had an account, I would most certainly be selling Reid contracts. Intrade gave the Delaware Republican candidate a 55% of winning when Christine O'Donnell was leading Mike Castle, and even after her primary victory, it only sunk to 20% despite polling data confirming her unelectability.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 08, 2010, 10:48:46 PM »

some good points to keep in mind here

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/oct/08/jon-ralston-consequences-flawed-public-polling/

this race is a tossup, and I don't need the word "still"
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,722


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 08, 2010, 10:54:05 PM »


Intrade seems to be a lagging indicator, and if I had an account, I would most certainly be selling Reid contracts. Intrade gave the Delaware Republican candidate a 55% of winning when Christine O'Donnell was leading Mike Castle, and even after her primary victory, it only sunk to 20% despite polling data confirming her unelectability.

Actually he's doing better now.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 08, 2010, 11:06:14 PM »

Isn't this thread just a LITTLE reactionary?   It's 4 friggin %

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

I would be glad to see Harry Reid lose, but, even as a conservative, I'm not sure I can stomach Angle.  Are there any large enclaves of Native Americans that might pull Reid over the line as they did for Johnson against Thune in 2002?

Nevada Indians are 1-2% of the population.
Logged
albaleman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,212
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 11, 2010, 09:26:20 PM »

Isn't this thread just a LITTLE reactionary?   It's 4 friggin %

I don't think that word means what you think it means.


That word most certainly does not mean what you think it means, Lunar. But I find it funny that that word came up in a thread about Sharron Angle, because it's a perfect description of her and her views.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2010, 09:03:30 AM »

Today's Nevada Senate poll - Angle 49, Reid 48
(w/o leaners) Angle 47, Reid 45

Enjoy.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2010, 09:05:14 AM »

That's nice. I was worried Angle might be pulling away.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 16 queries.