Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 11:15:59 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2010 Elections
| | |-+  2010 House Election Polls (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | | |-+  A little something to remember
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: A little something to remember  (Read 500 times)
Comrade Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 55454
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« on: October 07, 2010, 12:48:04 pm »
Ignore

The record of constituency polling in all countries that have single-member districts verges on the outright appalling. This is as true of the U.S as everywhere else.

Not saying that we should ignore all the polls of House districts, but it's something worth keeping in mind.
Logged



Richard Hoggart 1918-2014
The Kingfish
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8001
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2010, 01:18:26 pm »
Ignore

Sssh....don't give it away....
Logged

cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7704


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2010, 01:26:22 pm »
Ignore

In 2006 and 2008, House polls taken within 15 days of the election were within 5 points of the final outcome 81% of the time.  That's lower than gubernatorial (88%) and Senate (90%) polling - but still significantly more correct than not.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15519
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2010, 03:18:20 pm »
Ignore

In 2006 and 2008, House polls taken within 15 days of the election were within 5 points of the final outcome 81% of the time.  That's lower than gubernatorial (88%) and Senate (90%) polling - but still significantly more correct than not.

Also, looking at the Pollster.com database this information was taken from, polls used to create this info for 2008 House races are 45.1% partisan/internal polls, while 2008 Gubernatorial race polls are only 28.8% partisan/internal.

In addition, while I was only counting through to determine the above, I did notice that the House elections had a much higher occurrence of random uni pollsters and such compared to the Gubernatorial elections.

I didn't look through the Senate election polls but I'd imagine they'd be very similar in composition to the list of Gubernatorial polls.

I think the reduced accuracy of House polls found in your link, cynic, can be mostly explained by pollster quality.

I know that single-member district polls throughout the world always have some accuracy problems, which is to be expected when polling a district of, say, around 100,000 people. I think this error would be much more reduced in US House elections, however, compared to elsewhere, with the average Congressional district population being greater than the four least populous states- and I don't think polls in AK, ND, VT, or WY are any less accurate than NY or CA or what-have-you.
Logged


BK without all the crazy drugs just wouldn't be BK.
Bacon King: 1.  You're cute, in a weird Tom Wopat kind of way.
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2010, 08:08:14 am »
Ignore

Most other countries also have far fewer constituency polls... and let's face it, only by doing it repeatedly can pollsters get any good at it.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines