Robert Healey (Cool Moose) for RI Lt Gov, a position he wants to eliminate.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 05:31:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Robert Healey (Cool Moose) for RI Lt Gov, a position he wants to eliminate.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Robert Healey (Cool Moose) for RI Lt Gov, a position he wants to eliminate.  (Read 1661 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 11, 2010, 06:38:19 PM »

This guy is running for Lieutenant Governor of Rhode Island, on the basis of eliminating his useless position, which is literally to do nothing except wait for the governor to die (which nevertheless costs over $1 million a year).  Not a chance, you might say, except that the Republican has dropped out of the race and endorsed him, and he's evidently the front-runner.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2010, 07:04:28 PM »

The Libertarians ran someone for Lt. Governor on this platform in Washington State back in 2000. She got 7% statewide in a three-way race.

Anyways, I see no reason why the incumbent won't be re-elected.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2010, 07:15:26 PM »

The Libertarians ran someone for Lt. Governor on this platform in Washington State back in 2000. She got 7% statewide in a three-way race.

Anyways, I see no reason why the incumbent won't be re-elected.

Don't forget the independent in 1992 who legally changed their name to "Absolutely Nobody" and got 7% on that same platform. Grin
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2010, 07:20:28 PM »

     Eliminating the Lt. Governorship in general seems like a pretty sensible platform position. There are exceptions where the Lt. Governor wields real power, such as in Texas, but plenty of states have no use for them.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2010, 09:05:35 PM »

He's a perennial candidate. He ran for Governor in '94 and '98 and Lt. Governor in '02 and '06.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2010, 09:27:16 PM »

He's a perennial candidate. He ran for Governor in '94 and '98 and Lt. Governor in '02 and '06.

And he did relatively well each time.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2010, 10:03:28 PM »

And the Chairman of the RI GOP was completely fine with Heidi Rogers' little stunt.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2010, 03:05:25 AM »

     Eliminating the Lt. Governorship in general seems like a pretty sensible platform position. There are exceptions where the Lt. Governor wields real power, such as in Texas, but plenty of states have no use for them.

My idea is as follows:

Lieutenant Governor should be abolished as an office, but kept as a title that would be held in conjunction with other elective office. The Lieutenant Governor would be appointed by the Governor from among elected cabinet members or state legislators, and would be confirmed by the legislature.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2010, 08:26:49 PM »

     Eliminating the Lt. Governorship in general seems like a pretty sensible platform position. There are exceptions where the Lt. Governor wields real power, such as in Texas, but plenty of states have no use for them.

My idea is as follows:

Lieutenant Governor should be abolished as an office, but kept as a title that would be held in conjunction with other elective office. The Lieutenant Governor would be appointed by the Governor from among elected cabinet members or state legislators, and would be confirmed by the legislature.

     That's something I could get behind. The problem with something like making the Speaker of the Assembly automatically second-in-line is that someone in a legislative position like that might not want an executive position such as Governor. This way, we at least know that the person who is second-in-line would actually want to be Governor if the need arose.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2010, 08:31:00 PM »

     Eliminating the Lt. Governorship in general seems like a pretty sensible platform position. There are exceptions where the Lt. Governor wields real power, such as in Texas, but plenty of states have no use for them.

My idea is as follows:

Lieutenant Governor should be abolished as an office, but kept as a title that would be held in conjunction with other elective office. The Lieutenant Governor would be appointed by the Governor from among elected cabinet members or state legislators, and would be confirmed by the legislature.

     That's something I could get behind. The problem with something like making the Speaker of the Assembly automatically second-in-line is that someone in a legislative position like that might not want an executive position such as Governor. This way, we at least know that the person who is second-in-line would actually want to be Governor if the need arose.

Right, and it also prevents dramatic changes in government policy like we saw in Arizona recently.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2010, 02:13:44 AM »

FWIW, Healy was behind 48%-43% per the recent NBC 10-Quest Research poll and 35.8%-22.5% in the recent Brown University poll.  The Brown poll really didn't push leaners, though - 34.3% were undecided.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.